Skip to main content

CT Angiography for Assessment of Coronary Bypass Grafts

  • Chapter
Book cover CT of the Heart

Part of the book series: Contemporary Cardiology ((CONCARD))

  • 1245 Accesses

Abstract

With the advent of subsecond rotation combined with prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering or retrospective ECG gating, conventional computed tomography (CT) with spiral capability and superior general image quality has challenged electron beam CT (EBCT) in the domain of cardiac imaging. The introduction of multislice CT scanning with the Siemens SOMATOM Volume Zoom with 4 simultaneously scanned slices, half-second rotation, and 250-ms maximum temporal resolution has recently opened new horizons for cardiac CT imaging. ECG-gated multislice spiral CT represents a leap in image quality of CT angiography (CTA) of the coronary arteries. The fast volume coverage allows scanning the heart with 1-mm slice collimation within a single breath-hold (10 cm in 25–30 s) for high-resolution imaging. Three-dimensional reconstruction with approx 1-mm slice width and submillimeter increment provide data of unique quality for visualization of the coronary arteries and of the arterial/venous grafts utilized for surgical revascularization. This chapter will be focused on the clinical background, the previous CT applications in this setting, and the recent results of multidetector-row CT (MDCT) evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shumacker HB. The Evolution of Cardiac Surgery. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN: 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garrett HE, Dennis EW, DeBakey ME. Aortocoronary bypass with saphenous vein graft: seven-year follow-up. JAMA 1973;223:792–794.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Favaloro RG. Critical analysis of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a 30-year journey. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1B–63B.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Campeau L, Enjalbert M, Lesperance J, et al. The relation of risk factors to the development of atherosclerosis in saphenous vein bypass grafts and the progression of disease in the native circulation: a study 10 years after aortocoronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1329–1332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bourassa MG. Fate of venous grafts: the past, the present and the future. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;5:1081–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:616–626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Loop FD. Internal-thoracic-artery grafts: biologically better coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 1996;334:263–265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Calafiore AM, Angelini GD, Bergsland J, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1545–1548.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brundage BH, Lipton MJ, Herfkens RJ, et al. Detection of patent bypass grafts by computed tomography: a preliminary report. Circulation 1980;61:826–831.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ullyot DJ, Turley K, McKay CR, et al. Assessment of saphenous vein graft patency by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982;83:512–518.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Godwin JD, Califf RM, Korobkin M, et al. Clinical value of coronary bypass graft evaluation with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;140:649–655.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Daniel WG, Dohring W, Stender HS, et al. Value and limitations of computed tomography in assessing aortocoronary bypass graft patency. Circulation 1983;67:983–987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tello R, Costello P, Ecker CP, et al. Spiral CT evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:253–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Engelmann MG, von Smekal A, Knez A, et al. Accuracy of spiral computed tomography for identifying arterial and venous coronary graft patency. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:569–574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tello R, Hartnell GG, Costello P, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft flow: qualitative evaluation with cine single-detector row CT and comparison with findings at angiography. Radiology 2002;224:913–918.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ha JW, Cho SY, Shim WH, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patencyusing three-dimensional angiography obtained with contrast-enhanced electron beam CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1055–1059.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu B, Dai RP, Jing BL, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency using three-dimensional reconstruction and flow study on electron beam tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:663–670.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. von Smekal A, Lachat M, Wildermuth S, et al. Proximal anastomoses of aortocoronary bypasses. Evaluation with ECG-triggered single-slice computerized tomography. Radiologe 2000;40:130–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohtsuka T, Takamoto S, Endoh M, et al. Ultrafast computed tomography for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:173–174.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bauer EP, Bino MC, von Segesser LK, et al. Internal mammary artery anomalies. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;38:312–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. De Santis M, Quagliarini F, Leonetti C, et al. MDSCT pre-operative evaluation of internal mammary arteries (IMAs) in patients candidate to minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICABG) (abs). ECR, Vienna, Austria: 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weintraub WS, Jones EL, Craver JM, et al. Frequency of repeat coronary bypass or coronary angioplasty after coronary artery bypass surgery using saphenous venous grafts. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:103–112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Reoperation for coronary atherosclerosis: changing practice in 2509 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 1990;212:378–386.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cameron A, Kemp HG Jr, Green GE. Reoperation for coronary artery disease: 10 years of clinical follow-up. Circulation 1988;78(Suppl I):I/158–I/162.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yamaguchi A, Adachi H, Ino T, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography as pre-operative evaluation of a patent internal thoracic artery graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:811–812.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. von Smekal A. The potential of cardio-computed tomography. Multislice CT: a practical guide. Proceedings of the 5th International Somatom CT User Conference. Zurich, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker CR, et al. Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology 2000;217:564–571.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ, et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 2001;357(9256):599–603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E, et al. Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:792–795.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Humana Press, Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Santis, M. (2005). CT Angiography for Assessment of Coronary Bypass Grafts. In: Schoepf, U.J. (eds) CT of the Heart. Contemporary Cardiology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-818-8:301

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-818-8:301

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-303-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-818-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics