Skip to main content

Radiation Dose From CT of the Heart

  • Chapter
CT of the Heart

Part of the book series: Contemporary Cardiology ((CONCARD))

Abstract

The issue of radiation dose from X-ray computed tomography (CT) has received much attention recently in both the popular media and scientific literature (15). This is in part due to the fact that the dose levels from CT typically exceed those from conventional radiography and fluoroscopy, and that the use of CT continues to grow. Thus, CT contributes a significant portion of the total collective dose from ionizing radiation delivered to the public from medical procedures. It is important, therefore, that physicians ordering or performing these examinations have an understanding of the dose delivered from a cardiac CT, as well as how that amount of radiation compares to those from other imaging procedures that use ionizing radiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 2001;176: 289–296.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children’s hospital. AJR 2001;176:303–306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haaga JR. Radiation dose management. AJR 2001;177:289–291.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO. Radiation exposure to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. AJR 2001;177:285–287.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pierce DA, Preston DL. Radiation-related cancer risks at low dose among atomic bomb survivors. Radiation Research 2000;154:178–186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shope TB, Gagne RM, Johnson GC. A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 1981;8:488–495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Standardized methods for measuring diagnostic x-ray exposures. Report no. 31. AAPM, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nagel HD. Radiation exposure in computed tomography. Frankfurt: COCIR, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. European guidelines for quality criteria for computed tomography. Luxembourg: European Commission, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical Electrical Equipment. Part 2-44: Particular Requirements for the Safety of X-ray Equipment for Computed Tomography. IEC publication No. 60601-2-44 Amendment 1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCollough CH, Zink FE. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Medical Physics 1999;26:2223–2230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gies M, Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C, Madsen M. Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation I: simulation studies. Medical Physics 1999;26:2235–2247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C. Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation II: phantom measurements. Medical Physics 1999;26:2248–2253.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Eur Rad 2002;12: 1081–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation, BEIR V. Washington, DC: National Academy, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 1990 Recommendations of the ICRP. Publication 60. ICRP, New York, NY, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCollough CH, Schueler BA. Calculation of effective dose. Medical Physics 2000;27:828–837.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones DG, Shrimpton PC. Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 3: Normalised organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo techniques, NRPB-250. Oxon, United Kingdom: National Radiological Protection Board, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zankl M, Panzer W, Drexler G. The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods. Part IV: Organ dose from computed tomographic examinations, GSF-Bericht 30/91. Neuherberg, Germany: GSF — Forschungszentrum fur Umwelt und Gesundtheit, Institut fur Strahlenschutz, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Humana Press, Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCollough, C.H. (2005). Radiation Dose From CT of the Heart. In: Schoepf, U.J. (eds) CT of the Heart. Contemporary Cardiology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-818-8:063

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-818-8:063

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-303-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-818-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics