Skip to main content
  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

Public authorities’ prudential regulations concerning financial intermediaries and their effective supervision (discussed in Chapters 3 and 4) are often considered to be the foremost safety nets. Their objectives are (a) at the micro level to ensure that individual financial institutions are well capitalized and well managed; and (b) at the macro level to safeguard the soundness, efficiency and stability of the financial system. Besides the regulatory-supervisory frameworks, specific post-failure and government-supported financial safety nets — discussed hereafter — are deemed to be valuable complements to enhancing savers’ and investors’ confidence, and reinforcing financial stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. For a brief synopsis of recent crisis situations that had a potential of systemic problems, see Arturo Estrella, ‘Dealing with Financial Instability: The Central Bank’s Tool Kit’, Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review Stockholm, 2001, 2nd quarter, pp. 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Bank for International Settlements, 10th Annual Report Basel, 5 June 2000, p. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  3. John D. Hawke, Jr, US Comptroller of the Currency, ‘Remarks Before the New York State Department of Banking’, 15 October 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Eugene White, Deposit insurance, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, Washington, DC, November 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Finance for Growth: Policy Choices in a Volatile World (Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 13; Luc Laeven, Pricing Deposit Insurance World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, July 2002

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. J. R. Barth, G. Caprio and R. Levine, Bank Regulation and Supervision: What Works Best World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, December 2001; and Eugene White, Deposit Insurance (see Note 6 above).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lars Frisell and Martin Noréus, ‘Consolidation in the Swedish Banking Sector: A Central Bank Perspective’, Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review, Stockholm, 2002, 3rd quarter, pp. 20–38.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Group of Ten, Report on Consolidation in the Financial Sector, BIS, January 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, for example, Michael Wolgast, ‘M&As in the Financial Industry — A Matter of Concern for Bank Supervisors?’, Bulletin, (Frankfurt: Deutsche Bank Research, 5 June 2001), pp. 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Lisa M. De Ferrari and David E. Palmer, ‘Supervision of Large Complex Banking Organizations’, Federal Reserve Bulletin, Washington, DC, February 2001, pp. 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  11. FDIC, Rosalind L. Bennett, ‘Failure Resolution and Asset Liquidation: Results of an International Survey of Deposit Insurers’, FDIC Banking Review, Washington, DC, vol. 14, no. 1, 2001, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See, for example, A. George Kaufman and Steven A. Seeling, ‘Post-resolution Treatment of Depositors at Failed Banks: Systemic Risk, and Too Big to Fail’, Economic Perspectives, 2002, 2nd quarter, pp. 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See, for example, Timothy Curry and Lynn Shibut, ‘The Cost of the Savings and Loan Crisis: Truth and Consequences’, FDIC Banking Review, Washington, DC, 2000, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See RBA Holding, Poursuite de l’évolution stratégique sur un fondement solide, Berne, April 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For further details, see Joseph Yung, From Schweizrische Kreditanstalt to Credit Suisse Group — The History of a Bank, Credit Suisse Group. (Zurich: NZZ Verlag, 2000), pp. 257–63.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See John S. Jordan, ‘Depositor Discipline at Failing Banks’, New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, March/April 2000, pp. 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, for example, R. D. Eisenbeis and L. D. Wall, ‘Reforming Deposit Insurance and FDICIA’, Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 2002, 1st quarter, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Japanese Bankers’ Association, Japanese Banks 2001 May 2001, p. 14

    Google Scholar 

  19. and Bank of Japan, Annual Review 2001, Tokyo 2001, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Japanese Bankers’ Association, Japanese Banks 2002 Tokyo, 2002, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See, for example, FDIC, Deposit Insurance Options Paper, Washington, DC, August 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For a succinct review of the literature on this subject, see, for example, Joâo A. C. Santos, Bank Capital Regulation in Contemporary Banking Theory: A Review o f the Literature (Basel: BIS, September 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Ron Feldman and Mark Levonian, ‘Market Data and Bank Supervision: The Transition to Practical Use’, The Region, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, September 2001, pp. 11–13 and 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Eugène Fama, ‘Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work’, Journal of Finance, May 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See FDIC, Financial Education in Underserved Communities Press release, Washington, DC, 13 June 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Institute of International Bankers, Global Survey 2002 — Regulatory and Market Developments, Banking — Securities — Insurance, New York, September 2002, pp. 25–6

    Google Scholar 

  27. ‘Argentina’s Economy — Defaulter of Last Resort’, The Economist, 8 March 2003, pp. 54 and 55.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See Marco del Negro and Stephen J. Kay, ‘Global Banks, Local Crises: Bad News from Argentina’, Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 2002, 3rd quarter, pp. 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See also Financial Stability Forum (FSF), Guidance for Developing Effective Deposit Insurance Systems, Basel, September 2001

    Google Scholar 

  30. and G. Garcia, Protecting Bank Deposits, (Washington, DC: IMF, July 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  31. See US General Accounting Office, Securities Investor Protection — Steps Needed to Better Disclose SPIC Policies to Investors Washington, DC, May 2002

    Google Scholar 

  32. and ‘Millions in US Believe Their Losses Will Be Covered’, Financial Times London, 2 August 2001, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hans-Jörg Rudloff, cited in ‘Investment Banks — Living in Leaner Times’, The Economist, 4 August 2001, pp. 57–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See William R. White, Recent Initiatives to Improve the Regulation and Supervision of Private Capital Flows, (Basel: BIS, October 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  35. GAO, Securities Investor Protection — Steps Needed to Better Disclose SIPC Policies to Investors, Washington, DC, May 2001, p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See, for example, C. Enoch, G. Garcia and V. Sundararajan, ‘Recapitalizing Banks with Public Funds’, IMF Staff Papers, vol. 48, issue 1, Washington, DC, 2001, pp. 58–110.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See E. Barandiaran and L. Hernandez, Origins and Resolution of a Banking Crisis: Chile 1982–86 Central Bank of Chile, December 1999, Working Paper No. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  38. See, for example, Philip Lowe, ‘Maintaining Financial Stability: Possible Policy Options’, Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review Stockholm, 2001, 2nd quarter, pp. 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See, for example, Claudio Borio and Philip Lowe, Asset Prices, Financial and Monetary Stability: Exploring the Nexus, Basel: BIS Working Papers, July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Alan Greenspan, Economic Volatility Symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 30 August 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See Groupe Caisse des Dépôts, ‘Political Risk: A Component of Country Risk’, Lettre Economique de la CDC Paris, April 2002, pp. 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  42. For calculation of premiums, see, for example: ERG, Swiss Export Risk Guarantee Agency (Zurich: ERG, April 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  43. See, for example, US General Accounting Office, Disaster Assistance, Washington, DC, August 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  44. See, for example, Ron J. Feldman, ‘Mortgage Rates, Homeownership Rates, and Government-Sponsored Enterprises’, The Region, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Annual Report 2001, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  45. GAO, Government-Sponsored Enterprises — The Government Exposure to Risks, Washington, DC, August 1990, p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Zuhayr Mikdashi

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mikdashi, Z. (2003). Financial Safety Nets. In: Regulating the Financial Sector in the Era of Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403990112_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics