Advertisement

Liquidity Black Holes: Why Modern Financial Regulation in Developed Countries is Making Short-Term Capital Flows to Developing Countries Even More Volatile

  • Avinash Persaud
Part of the Studies in Development Economics and Policy book series (SDEP)

Abstract

Since the early 1990s financial regulation has been about the spread of market-sensitive risk-management systems for banks, the spillover of this approach to other financial institutions and, in general, the retreat of regulatory ambition. There is growing evidence that these trends are leading to a more fragile financial system that is prone to concentration, crisis and ‘liquidity black holes’. This problem has not been sufficiently addressed because, although it is born of the regulation of financial institutions in developed countries, its most glaring effects are the procyclicality and volatility of capital flows to emerging markets (Griffith-Jones, 1998; Ffrench-Davis and Reisen, 1998).

Keywords

Hedge Fund Capital Flow State Street Market Maker Foreign Exchange Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archarya, S. (2001) ‘New International Standards for Financial Stability: Desirable Regulatory Reform of Runaway Juggernaut?’, in S. Griffith-Jones and Amar Bhattacharya (eds), Developing Countries and the Global Financial System, London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  2. Bank for International Settlements (BIS) (2001) www.bis.org.
  3. Bank of Japan (1999) Risk Measurement and Systemic Risk, Proceedings of the Second Joint Central Bank Research Conference, Tokyo: Bank of Japan.Google Scholar
  4. Borio, C. (2000) ‘Market Liquidity and Stress: Selected Issues and Policy Implications’, BIS Quarterly Review, November: 38–51.Google Scholar
  5. Eatwell, J. (1997) ‘International Financial Liberalisation: The Impact on World Development’, ODS Discussion Paper 12, New York: Office of Development Studies, UNDP.Google Scholar
  6. Engle, R. F. and J. Lange (1997) ‘Measuring, Forecasting and Explaining Time Varying Liquidity in the Stock Market’, NBER Working Paper no. 6129, Cambridge, MA: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ffrench-Davis, R. and H. Reisen (eds) (1998) Capital Flows and Investment Performance: Lessons from Latin America, Paris: OECD Development Centre/ECLAC.Google Scholar
  8. Fleming, M. and E. Remolona (1999) ‘Price Formation and Liquidity in the US Treasury Market: The Response to Public Information’, Journal of Finance, 54, 5: 1901–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffith-Jones, S. (1998) Global Capital Flows, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gurría, J. A. (1995) ‘Capital Flows: the Mexican Case’, in R. Ffrench-Davis and S. Griffith-Jones (eds), Coping with Capital Surges, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  11. O’Hara, M. (1995) Market Microstructure Theory, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Perry, G. and D. Lederman (1998) ‘Financial Vulnerability, Spillover Effects and Contagion: Lessons from the Asian Crises for Latin America’, World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Studies Viewpoints, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  13. Persaud, A. (2000) ‘Sending the Herd off the Cliff Edge’, World Economics, 1, 4 (October–December).Google Scholar
  14. — (2001a) ‘Fads and Fashions in the Policy Response to Financial Market Crises’, in L. Jacque and P. M. Vaaler (eds), Financial Innovations and the Welfare of Nations, New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. — (2001b) ‘Cohabiting with Goliath: How Small Exchanges will Survive in the Future’, World Economics, 2, 4 (October–December).Google Scholar
  16. State Street Bank and FDO Partners (2000) ‘Liquidity Index’, technical document, London: State Street Bank and FDO Partners.Google Scholar
  17. Shiller, R. (1990) ‘Investor Behaviour in the October 1987 Stock Market Crash: Survey Evidence’, NBER Discussion Paper no. 2446, Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  18. Turner, P. (2000) ‘Procyclicality of Regulatory Ratios?’, in J. Eatwell and L. Taylor (eds), Global Finance at Risk: The Case for International Regulation, New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  19. Wermers, R. (1998) ‘Mutual Fund Herding and the Impact on Stock Prices’, Journal of Finance, 54, 2.Google Scholar
  20. Williamson, J. (1993) ‘A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Capital Account Liberalization’, in H. Reisen and B. Fischer (eds), Financial Opening, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© United Nations University 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avinash Persaud

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations