Abstract
This chapter lays the foundation for the conceptual underpinnings of our central research question. It aims at drawing forth the essential components of the main thesis in order to connect these with the prime objective of our central research inquiry. In this endeavor, and based on the essential elements underlying the Habermasian theory of communicative action and the extent to which these may be reflected in William Smyser’s recently released U.S.-led study on Germany’s negotiating behavior, it is hoped that a “navigational aid” can be developed with which the empirical analysis of Germany’s influence on the U.S. decision to enlarge NATO can then proceed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Maull, “Forderungen an die deutsche Außenpolitik,” Internationale Politik, vol. 58, no. 12, December 2001, pp. 1–10, p. 7.
See Henning Tewes, Germany, Civilian Power and the New Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.
Wolf Mendl, “Strategic Thinking in Diplomacy: A Legacy of the Cold War,” in Michael Clarke (ed.), New Perspectives on Security, The Centre for Defence Studies, London: Brassey’s, 1993, pp. 1–16, here p. 16.
See Harald Müller, “Arguing, Bargaining and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness,” European Journal of International Relations, vol. 10, no. 03, September 2004, pp. 395–435.
Paul Sharp, “For Diplomacy: Representation and the Study of International Relations,” International Studies Review, vol. 1, no. 1, 1999, pp. 33–57, here, p. 56.
François de Callières, On the Manner of Negotiating with Princes, Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1919.
Harold Nicholson, Diplomacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939
Harold Nicholson, The Evolution of Diplomatic Method, London: Constable, 1954.
James Der Derian, “Mediating Estrangement: A Theory for Diplomacy,” Review of International Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, 1987, pp. 91–110, p. 91.
Keith Hamilton and Richard Langhorne, The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration, London and New York: Routledge, 1995, p. 1.
Jose Calvet De Magalhaes, The Pure Concept of Diplomacy, New York: Greenwood Press, 1988, p. 59.
Raymond Cohen, “Reflections on the New Global Diplomacy: Statecraft 2500 BC to 2000 AD,” in Jan Melissen (ed.), Innovation in Diplomatic Practice, London: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999, p. 4.
Adam Watson, Diplomacy: The Dialogue between States, London: Eyre Methuen, 1982, p. 60.
Henry Kissinger, Diplomacy, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994.
M. Costas Constantinou, On the Way to Diplomacy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996, p. 25.
Alan James, “Diplomacy and International Society,” International Relations, vol. 6, no. 6, 1980, pp. 931–948, p. 942.
Fred Charles Iklé, How Nations Negotiate, New York: Praeger, 1964, p. 2.
Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960, p. 21.
Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict; and Anatol Rapoport, Fights, Games and Debates, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960.
Terrence P. Hopmann, “Two Paradigms of Negotiation: Bargaining and Problem-Solving,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 542, 1995, pp. 24–27.
Howard Raiffa, The Art and Science of Negotiation, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.
Robert Axelrod, The Complexity of Cooperation, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
Glenn Snyder and Paul Diesing, Conflicts among Nations: Bargaining, Decisionmaking, and System Structure in International Crises, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.
James Sebenius, “Negotiation Analysis,” in Victor Kremenyuk (ed.), International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues, San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1991.
Terrence Hopmann, The Negotiation Process and the Resolution of International Conflict, Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, 1996.
Thomas Risse, Cooperation among Democracies. The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997
William Zartman and Jeffrey Rubin, Power and Negotiation, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.
Thomas C. Schelling, Arms and Influence, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1966.
William Zartmann and Maureen Berman, The Practical Negotiator, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1982, pp. 93–95.
Dean G. Pruitt, “Flexibility in Conflict Episodes,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 542, 1995, 100–115.
Copyright information
© 2006 Chaya Arora
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arora, C. (2006). The Smyser-Habermasian “Navigational Aid”. In: Germany’s Civilian Power Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983343_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983343_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53477-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-8334-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)