Skip to main content

Biblical Literalism and Gender Stability: A Christian Response to Gender Performance Theory

  • Chapter
Being Feminist, Being Christian
  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

In March 2005, I was invited to participate in a forum on Christianity and feminism sponsored by a student-run organization on the campus of Azusa Pacific University, where I teach in the English department. Since I cover feminist theory in my course on literary criticism, I was eager to accept the invitation. Joining me on the panel of respondents were two students, a professor of biblical studies, and an Episcopal priest, the Reverend Wilma Jakobsen, who is known for her work on women’s issues in her native South Africa. Following some introductory remarks by the panelists, questions were solicited from the roughly one hundred members of the audience. After a few tentative opening comments and questions from students around the room, a woman near the front posed the crucial, inevitable question: “If you are claiming to be biblically-based feminists, how do you explain those passages in scripture which speak out against placing women in positions of religious leadership?” Without hesitation, Reverend Jakobsen responded, “I don’t think you can be a feminist and take the Bible literally.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, K. (1958). Church dogmatics. Ed. G. W. Bromiley and T. F. Torrance. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, P. A. (1995). “Sexual differentiation and divine image in the Genesis creation texts.” Image of God: Gender models in Judaeo-Christian tradition. Ed. K. E. Borresen. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blade runner. (1982). Dir. R. Scott. Perf. H. Ford, R. Hauer, S. Young, E. J. Olmos, D. Hannah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Børresen, K. E. (1995). “Introduction: Imago Dei as inculturated doctrine.” Image of God: Gender models inJudaeo-Christian tradition. Fortress Press: Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (2002). Must we mean what we say?: A book of essays. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1998). “Signature event context.” Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, A. (1993). “The five sexes.” The sciences. (March–April): 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). “The five sexes, revisited.” The sciences. (July–August): 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (1991). “Feminist literary criticism: A chorus of ethical voices.” Contemporary literary theory: A Christian appraisal. Ed. C. Walhout and L. Ryken. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). “A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century.” Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2000). Genesis. New international Biblical commentary. Old Testament Series 1. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Holy Bible: New international version. (1978). Grand Rapids: Zondervan Bible Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. E. (2002). The right questions: Truth, meaning, and public debate. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, T. (1990). Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riviere, J. (1929) “Womanliness as masquerade.” International journal of psychoanalysis. 10: 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruether, R. R. (1995). “Imago Dei, Christian tradition and feminist hermeneutics.” Image of God: Gender models in Judaeo-Christian tradition. Ed. K. E. Borresen. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teugels, L. (2000). “The creation of the human in rabbinic interpretation.” The creation of man and woman: Interpretations of the Biblical narratives in Jewish and Christian traditions. Ed. G. P. Luttikhuizen. Boston, MA: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trible, P. (1978). God and the rhetoric of sexuality. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Allyson Jule Bettina Tate Pedersen

Copyright information

© 2006 Allyson Jule and Bettina Tate Pedersen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Noble, C. (2006). Biblical Literalism and Gender Stability: A Christian Response to Gender Performance Theory. In: Jule, A., Pedersen, B.T. (eds) Being Feminist, Being Christian. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983107_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics