Skip to main content

The Designer Fallacy and Technological Imagination

  • Chapter

Abstract

Earlier in the twentieth century, literary theorists developed the notion of an “intentional fallacy.” This was the notion that the (meaning of a text lay with the author’s intentions: if these could be uncovered, then the meaning of the text was established. One can easily see how, if this is the only true way to establish meaning, there could be difficulties. What if the author was long dead? Or, even if the author was living, how could one tell that he or she was telling the truth? What of unintended meanings, or meanings that fit but were not thought of in advance? Thus, the intentional fallacy recognizes such difficulties and cannot be considered an adequate account of interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • De Landa, M. (1991). War in the Age of Intelligent Machines. Swerve Editions. New York: Zone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, F. (1990). “The mechanized philosopher.” In Laurence Rickels (ed.), Looking After Nietzsche. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyre, L. (2003). Fidelity Matters: Sound Media and Realism in the 20th Century. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Media Studies, University of Bergen, Volda University College: Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tenner, E. (1996). Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shock. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Jr., L. (1971). Cultural climates and technological advance in the middle ages. Viator 2: 1971: 171.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John R. Dakers

Copyright information

© 2006 John R. Dakers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ihde, D. (2006). The Designer Fallacy and Technological Imagination. In: Dakers, J.R. (eds) Defining Technological Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983053_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics