Abstract
This book has explored the dual process of deepening economic integration and intense political rivalry in relations across the Taiwan Strait. In this paradoxical development, Taipei’s policy of restricting the pace and direction of trade and investment flows to the mainland has not been successful despite its reputation as a strong state. At the same time, Beijing’s policies—designed to stem the separatist drift on the island through engagement with trade and investment—has only driven the two sides further apart politically. In an attempt at capturing the dynamics of cross-Strait relations, I first analyzed the politics of strategic interactions between the two sides. I then examined the specific policy designs of both sides regarding the flow of trade and investment across the Taiwan Strait. Finally and most importantly, I analyzed state-business interactions with regard to deepening economic relations between the two sides. The analytical focus of the book is on the organizational characteristics of the private sector and the institutional foundations of state—business interactions. Special attention has been paid to the role of small and medium-sized firms and their interactions with the state and with large firms in a multilevel and multidimensional process. This approach not only adds richness to Hirschman’s elegant theoretical formulation of economic statecraft, but also contrasts with prevailing analyses of East Asian political economy in general—and relations across the Taiwan Strait in particular—that regard economic development and cross-Strait interactions as a top-down process and treat private actors as simply reacting passively to state policies and state-sponsored projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For a review of the literature, see Susan M. McMillan. “Interdependence and Conflict,” Mershon International Studies Review, Supplement to the International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 41, Supplement 1, May 1997. 33–58;
Katherine Barbieri and Gerald Schneider. “Globalization and Peace: Assessing New Directions in the Study of Trade and Conflict,” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 36, No. 4, July 1999. 387–404.
Robert Gilpin. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press. 58.
Theda Skocpol et al., eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge University Press. 20.
Yun-han Chu. “The Political Economy of Taiwan’s Mainland Policy,” in Suisheng Zhao, ed. 1999. 168–169.
Richard P. Applebaum and Jeffrey Henderson, eds. 1992. States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim. Newbury Park: CA: Sage. 23.
Chalmers Johnson. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle. Stanford: Stanford University Press;
Alice Amsden. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press;
Robert Wade. 1990. Governing the Market: Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
David Friedman. 1988. The Misunderstood Miracle: Industrial Development and Political Change in Japan, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 4.
Richard J. Samuels. 1987. The Business of the Japanese State: Energy Markets in Comparative and Historical Perspective, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 262.
Copyright information
© 2006 John Q. Tian
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tian, J.Q. (2006). Conclusion. In: Government, Business, and the Politics of Interdependence and Conflict across the Taiwan Strait. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982841_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982841_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53414-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-8284-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)