Skip to main content

Abstract

As John Makeham has pointed out in the introductory chapter, there is as yet no consensus as to who is or is not a New Confucian. To most adherents of New Confucianism outside mainland China, Li Zehou, an avowed Marxist or “post-Marxist,” would be the last person to be accorded a place in the New Confucian canon. It is their common perception that Marxists and communists are responsible for destroying the Confucian tradition in China. By a curious twist of fate, Li has been pejoratively called a New Confucian in mainland China in the 1980s and 1990s by those who are probably no less anticommunist but even more anti-Confucian.1 The mainland Chinese scholars who identify themselves with New Confucianism, or who at least maintain scholarly neutrality toward that school of thought, have generally preferred to avoid the sensitive issue of Confucianism versus communism, and have widened the category to include non-anticommunist philosophers such as Feng Youlan 馮友蘭 (1895–1990). Even so, many of them are still evasive as to whether Li is a New Confucian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Liu Xiaobo, Xuanze de pipan—yu sixiang lingxiu Li Zehou duihua 选择的批判—與思想領袖李澤厚對話 (Critique of Choice: In Dialogue with the Intellectual Leader Li Zehou), Taipei: Fengyun shidai chubanshe, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li Zehou, “Lue lun xiandai xin Rujia 略論現代新儒學” (A Brief Discussion of Contemporary New Confucianism), in Li Zehou, Zhongguo xiandai sixiangshi lun 中國現代思想史論 (An Interpretative Intellectual History of Contemporary China; hereafter Xiandai sixiangshi lun), revised edition, Taipei: Fengyun shidai chubanshe, 1990, 377–93

    Google Scholar 

  3. “He wei ‘xiandai xin Ruxue ’ 何謂 ‘現代新儒學’” (What is ‘New Confucianism’), in Li Zehou, Shiji xin meng 世紀新夢 (New Dream of the Century; hereafter Xin meng), Hefei: Anhui wenyi chubanshe, 1999, 110.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sui-chi Huang, Essentials of Neo-Confucianism, Eight Major Philosophers of the Song and Ming Periods, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1999, 173–81;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fung Yu-lan, A History of Chinese Philosophy, trans. Derk Bodde, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1953, 58592, 605–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benjamin I. Schwartz, The World of Thought in Ancient China, Cambridge, M.A.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1985, 255–320.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ren Jiyu 任繼愈, Zhongguo zhexueshi 中國哲學史 (A History of Chinese Philosophy), 3:229, Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1979, 229.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Laurence G. Thompson (trans. and ed.), Ta T’ung Shu: The One-World Philosophy of K’ang Yu-wei, London: Allen & Unwin, 1958, 149–68.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lin Yusheng, The Crisis of Chinese Consciousness, Radical Antitraditionalism in the May Fourth Era, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1979, 35, 94, 105.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li Zehou, Gudai sixiangshi lun; Zhongguo jindai sixiangshi lun 中國近代思想史論 (An Interpretative Intellectual History of Modern China; hereafter Jindai sixiangshi lun), Taipei: Fengyun shidai chubanshe, revised edition, 1990; and Xiandai sixiangshi lun.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment, trans. Werner S. Pluhar, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1987. “Translator’s Introduction,” liv–lix.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karl Marx, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, quoted in Maynard Solomon (ed.), Marxism and Art, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1979, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu Yingshi, “Qian Mu yu xin Rujia 錢穆與新儒家” (Qian Mu and the New Confucians), in Yu Yingshi, Qian Mu yu Zhongguo wenhua 錢穆與中國文化 (Qian Mu and Chinese Culture), Shanghai. Shanghai yuandong chubanshe, 1996, 51–3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. KC. Chang, Art, Myth and Ritual. The Path to Political Authority in Ancient China, Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1983, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mou Zongsan, Xianxiang yu wuzishen 現象與自身 (Phenomena and Things-in-Themselves), Taipei: Xuesheng shuju, 1975, 121–4.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mou Zongsan, Shengming de xuewen 生命的學問 (Vital Learning), Taipei: Sanmin shuju, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Qian Mu, Zhongguo sixiangshi 中國思想史 (An Intellectual History of China), 3rd edition, Taipei: Zhonghua wenhua chuban shiye weiyuanhui, 1957, 125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John Makeham

Copyright information

© 2003 John Makeham

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chan, S. (2003). Li Zehou and New Confucianism. In: Makeham, J. (eds) New Confucianism: A Critical Examination. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982414_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics