Abstract
Despite the continued hostility and competition for legitimacy between the two Koreas, inter-Korean relations have slowly but steadily increased and diversified in recent years. From a North Korean perspective, this expanding interaction with Seoul embodies a fundamental contradiction in Pyongyang’s worldview: the DPRK’s long-standing “theological” belief in the superiority of the North Korean system and ultimate unification on North Korean terms on the one hand, and on the other a practical understanding that not only is the DPRK extremely disadvantaged economically—and in some ways even militarily —vis-à-vis the South, but that sustained and expanding contacts could pose a grave danger to the stability and viability of the North Korean political system. Yet Pyongyang seems willing to take that risk in order to rescue what remains of its economy and prevent even further decline and deterioration. Despite the inevitable talk of unification, inter-Korean relations are less important for Pyongyang as an end in themselves than as a means for economic revitalization, which is in turn an important part of Kim Jong Il’s own legitimation. As long as inter-Korean relations offer these benefits without appearing to threaten the security and stability of the DPRK regime, Pyongyang will likely continue dealing with Seoul in a contained and limited fashion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
James T. Laney and Jason T. Shaplen, “How to Deal with North Korea,” Foreign Affairs (March/April 2003 ): 17.
Han S. Park, North Korea: The Politics of Unconventional Wisdom ( Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner, 2002 ).
Karoly Fendler, “Economic Assistance and Loans from Socialist Countries to North Korea in the Postwar Years 1953–1963,” Asien 42 (January 1992): 39–51;
Ruediger Frank, Die DDR und Nordkorea: Der Wiederaufbau der Stadt Hamhung von 1954–1962 ( Aachen: Shaker, 1996 ).
Yi Chong-sok, Hyondae Puk Hanui ihae [Understanding Contemporary North Korea] (Seoul: Yoksa pip’yongsa, 2000 ), p. 381.
Howard W. French, “North Koreans Sign Agreement with Japanese,” New York Times September 18, 2002, p. A16.
Barry K. Gills, Korea versus Korea: The Political Economy of Diplomacy ( London: Routledge, 1996 ), p. 190.
Selig S. Harrison, Korean Endgame: A Strategy for Reunification and U.S. Disengagement ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002 ), p. 76.
B.C. Koh, “A Comparison of Unification Policies,” in Korea and the World: Beyond the Cold War, ed. Young Whan Kihl (Boulder: Westview Press, 1994 ), p. 156.
Charles K. Armstrong, “A Socialism of Our Style: North Korean Ideology in a Post-Communist Era,” in North Korean Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War Era, ed. Samuel S. Kim ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 ).
Paul Bracken, “The North Korean Nuclear Program as a Problem of State Survival,” in Asian Flashpoint: Security and the Korean Peninsula, ed. Andrew Mack (New York: Allen & Unwin, 1993 ), p. 86.
Howard W. French, “North Korea to Let Capitalism Loose in Investment Zone,” The New York Times, September 25, 2002, p. A3.
Howard W. French, “North Koreans Sign Agreement with Japanese,” The New York Times, September 18, 2002, p. A1.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Samuel S. Kim
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Armstrong, C.K. (2004). Inter-Korean Relations: A North Korean Perspective. In: Kim, S.S. (eds) Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980434_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980434_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52832-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-8043-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)