Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Voluntary Associations and Democratic Attitudes: Value Congruence as a Causal Mechanism

  • Chapter
Generating Social Capital

Abstract

In most of the recent research on social capital, a positive correlation is observed between membership of voluntary associations and the adherence to democratic value patterns. However, we have access to few research results, which could explain the causal mechanism that is responsible for this positive correlation. Two models seem to predominate the current literature on social capital (see Stolle this volume). Some authors clearly rely on a socialization logic: Because of the interaction with others, members of voluntary associations are socialized into more democratic and more social value patterns. Subsequently, these positive attitudes are transferred to society as a whole: Members do not only learn to trust their fellow members, but they also develop a generalized trust in other citizens. In this view, voluntary associations or other societal contexts function as learning schools for democracy, as de Tocqueville called it. Putnam (1995, 666) echoes this view when he states: “the causation flows mainly from joining to trusting.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrams, D. and M. Hogg (eds., 1991). Social Identity Theory. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. and P. Adler (1998). Peer Power. Preadolescent Culture and Identity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankston, C. and S. Caldas (1996). “Majority African American Schools and Social Injustice.” Social Forces 75(2), 535–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. (1997). “Civil Society and Political Institutionalization.” American Behavioral Scientist 40(5), 562–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billiet, J., A. Carton and R. Eisinga (1995). “Contrasting Effects of Church Involvement on the Dimensions of Ethnocentrism.” Social Compass 42(1), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. and W. Rahn (1997). “Individual Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital.” American Journal of Political Science 41(3), 999–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claibourn, M. and Martin, P. (2000). “Trusting and Joining? An Empirical Test of the Reciprocal Nature of Social Capital.” Political Behavior 22(4), 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P. (ed., 1999). Vrijwilligerswerk vergeleken. Civil Society en Vrijwilligerswerk III. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. and D. Fiske (1977). Face to Face Interaction. Research, Methods and Theory. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. (1983). An Introduction to Group Dynamics. Monterey: Brooks and Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, C. and D. Foster (1984). “Social Groups, Nonsense Groups and Group Polarization.” pp. 473–497. In H. Tajfel (ed.), The Social Dimension, volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, H. (1970). Jean Jaurès. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goslin, D. (ed., 1969). Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. New York: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A. et al. (1999). “Social Identity Salience and the Emergence of Stereotype Consensus.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25(7), 809–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, C. (ed., 1987). Group Processes. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M. (ed., 2000). Sociaal Kapitaal en Democratie. Verenigingsleven, Sociaal Kapitaal en Politieke Cultuur. Leuven: Acco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M. (2001). “Borders of Hospitality: The Difficult Birth of a Multicultural Society.” The Low Countries. Arts and Society in Flanders and the Netherlands 9, 94–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M. (2002). “Watching Television and Civic Engagement: Disentangling the Effects of Time, Programs and Stations.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 7(2), 84–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M. (2003). “Participation in Voluntary Associations and Value Indicators. The Effect of Current and Previous Participation Experiences.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 32(1), in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. and P. Lazarsfeld (1955). Personal Influence. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1996). “Social and Unsocial Capital.” Politics and Society 24(1), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. and E. Russo (1987). “Majority and Minority Influence.” pp. 13–54. In Clyde Hendrick (ed.), Group Processes. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S.M. (1959). “Democracy and Working-Class Authoritarianism.” American Sociological Review 24, 482–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers, M., P. Scheepers and J. Billiet (2000). “Multilevel Modelling of Vlaams Blok Voting.” Acta Politica 35(4), 363–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. and A. Kitt (1950). “Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behavior.” In R. Merton and P. Lazarsfeld (eds.), Continuities in Social Research. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, T. and S. Rosenberg (eds., 1970). Readings on the Sociology of Small Groups. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, J. and D. Mutz (1997). “What’s so great about League Bowling?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (1997). “Social Capital and Democracy.” American Behavioral Scientist 40(5), 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (1999). “Social Capital and Democracy in Modern Europe.” pp. 3–24. In J. van Deth et al. (eds.), Social Capital and European Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N., J. Junn and K. Stehlik-Barry (1996). Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. (ed., 1989). Psychology of Group Influence. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1995). “Tuning In, Tuning Out. The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28(4), 664–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. P. (ed., 1996). Social Groups and Identity. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, M. and G. Stephenson (1981). “The Effects of Intergroup Comparison on the Polarization of Opinions.” Current Psychological Research 1(1), 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soysal, Y. (1994). Limits of Citizenship. Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. (1998). “Bowling Alone, Bowling Together. Group Characteristics, Membership and Social Capital.” Political Psychology 19(3), 497–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. (2000). Communities of Trust. Public Action and Social Capital in Comparative Perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. (2002). “Social Capital—An Emerging Concept.” In B. Hobson, J. Lewis and B. Siim (eds.), Key Concepts in Gender and European Social Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. and M. Hooghe (2002). “The Roots of Social Capital. The Effect of Youth Experiences on Participation and Value Patterns in Adult Life.” Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29–September 1, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. and T. Rochon (1998). “Are All Associations Alike?” American Behavioral Scientist 42(2), 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de (1835). De la Démocratie en Amérique. Paris: Gallimard/Pléiade, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. (1982). “Toward a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group.” pp. 15–40. In H. Tajfel (ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. (1984). “Social Identification and Psychological Group Formation.” pp. 518–538. In H. Tajfel (ed.), The Social Dimension, volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. and P. Oakes (1989). “Self-Categorization Theory and Social Influence.” pp. 233–275. In P. Paulus (ed.), Psychology of Group Influence. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. et al. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. (1998). “Social Capital, Television and the ‘Mean World.’” Political Psychology 19(3), 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. (2000). “Producing and Consuming Trust.” Political Science Quarterly 115(4), 569–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S. (1961). Small Groups and Political Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S. and N. Nie (1972). Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman and H. Brady (1995). Voice and Equality. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, P. (1999). “The Origins of Social Capital.” pp. 25–44. In J. van Deth et al. (eds.), Social Capital and European Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. (ed., 1975). Socialization and Communication in Primary Groups. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. and M. Yamagishi (1994). “Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan.” Motivation and Emotion 18(2), 129–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Marc Hooghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Marc Hooghe Dietlind Stolle

Copyright information

© 2003 Marc Hooghe and Dietlind Stolle

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hooghe, M. (2003). Voluntary Associations and Democratic Attitudes: Value Congruence as a Causal Mechanism. In: Hooghe, M., Stolle, D. (eds) Generating Social Capital. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979544_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation