Skip to main content

The Importance of Passive Membership for Social Capital Formation

  • Chapter
Generating Social Capital

Abstract

Advocates of the virtues of participation assert that in a true democracy, citizens should be able to take an active part in civic matters, at least on the local level (Pateman 1970; Macpherson 1977). Regular elections and the existence of formal rights are by themselves not sufficient for democracy; they need to be supplemented by opportunities for direct democratic influence. On the other hand, pluralists emphasize how a diverse range of associations may act as representatives on the political scene, regardless of the activity level of the participants (Almond and Verba 1963). National political systems are too large to allow face-to-face discussion between all citizens. Therefore, the presence of associations is an institutional requirement if the combined values or interests of individuals are to be mediated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Almond, G. and S. Verba (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (1991 rev. ed.). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. (1997). “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.” World Politics 49(3), 401–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P., R. Koopmans and A. van den Broek (1997). “Voluntary Associations, Social Movements and Individual Political Behavior in Western Europe.” pp. 220–241. In J. van Deth (ed.), Private Groups and Public Life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P. and A. van den Broek (1998). “Civil Society in Comparative Perspective: Involvement in Voluntary Associations in North America and Western Europe.” Voluntas 9(1), 11–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M. and B. Edwards (1996). “The Paradox of Civil Society.” Journal of Democracy 7(3), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, R. K. (1992). “Money, Technology, and Political Interests: The Direct Marketing of Politics.” In M. Petracca (ed.), The Politics of Interests. Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, (1973). “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, C. B. (1977). The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W. (1999). “Contracting Out the Participation Function. Social Capital and Cheque-Book Participation.” In J. van Deth et al. (eds.), Social Capital and European Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouzelis, N. (1995). Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong. Diagnosis and Remedies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (1997). “Social Capital and Democracy.” American Behavioral Scientist 40(6), 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (1999). “Social Capital and Democracy in Modern Europe.” pp. 3–24. In J. van Deth et al. (eds.), Social Capital and European Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, P. (1999). “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States?” American Journal of Sociology 105(1), 88–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1995). “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy (6)1, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, K. (1996). “Human Bonds and Social Capital.” Orbis 40(2), 333–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (1998). “VarifrĂĄn kommer det sociala kapitalet?” Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 3(2), 164–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, D. (1998). “The Self-Organization of Society and Democratic Rule: Specifying the Relationship.” In D. Rueschemeyer, M. Rueschemeyer and B. Wittrock (eds.), Participation and Democracy. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, D., M. Rueschemeyer and B. Wittrock (eds., 1998). Participation and Democracy. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selle, P. and K. Strømsnes (1998). “Organised Environmentalists: Democracy as a Key Value?” Voluntas 9(4), 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selle, P. and K. Strømsnes (2001). “Membership and Democracy: Should We Take Passive Support Seriously.” In P. Dekker and E. Uslaner (eds.), Social Capital and Politics in Everyday Life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selle, P. (1998). “Organisasjonssamfunnet—ein statsreiskap?” In T. Grønlie and P. Selle (eds.), Ein stat? Fristillingas Fire Ansikt. Oslo: Samlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. (2001). “Clubs and Congregations: The Benefits of Joining an Association.” pp. 202–244. In K. Cook (ed.), Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. and T. Rochon (1999). “The Myth of American Exceptionalism. A Three-Nation Comparison of Associational Membership and Social Capital.” pp. 192–209. In J. van Deth et al. (eds.), Social Capital and European Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de (1954 [1835/40]). Democracy in America. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torcal, M. and J. Montero (1999). “Facets of Social Capital in New Democracies: The Formation and Consequences of Social Capital in Spain.” pp. 167–191. In J. van Deth et al. (eds.), Social Capital and\ European Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torpe, L. (1998). Lokal organisasjonsdeltakelse og demokrati. Mellem individ og fællesskab samt borger og styre. Bergen: LOS-senteret.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Deth, J. (1997). “Introduction: Social Involvement and Democratic Politics.” In J. van Deth (ed.), Private Groups and Public Life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, P. (1999). “The Origins of Social Capital.” In J. van Deth et al. (eds.), Social Capital and European Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollebæk, D. (2000). Participation in Voluntary Associations and the Formation of Social Capital. University of Bergen: Ph. D. Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollebæk, D., P. Selle and H. Lorentzen (2000). Frivillig Innsats. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Marc Hooghe Dietlind Stolle

Copyright information

© 2003 Marc Hooghe and Dietlind Stolle

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wollebæk, D., Selle, P. (2003). The Importance of Passive Membership for Social Capital Formation. In: Hooghe, M., Stolle, D. (eds) Generating Social Capital. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979544_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics