Skip to main content

Abstract

Concerns about the impact of scientific discoveries on Christian theology have been a reality for at least 400 years. From Copernicus and Galileo came the first major challenges to humanity as the imago dei and its home as the center of God’s purpose-filled creation. Subsequent discoveries compelled theologians to rethink everything from the meaning of miracles to the creation story itself. Again and again, doomsayers and scientific reductionists decreed the demise of religion under the burden of scientific “truth.” Yet religion survived and theologians carried on the task of interpreting doctrine in light of a rapidly changing world. But today, say some, theology might finally collapse under the weight of science.This is so because the cognitive sciences offer a challenge to so many aspects of theological reflection. As science uncovers the ways in which neurochemistry affects the mental life, serious questions arise about what it means to say we have a soul, that humanity is created in the image of God, that we sin yet have free will, that we can encounter the divine through prayer, mystical experience, and revelation, even to say that there is a personal God.

Cognitive science challenges our complacent theological claims about human nature and the human relation to God. It challenges but need not threaten, and if we listen closely and think deeply, our theological understanding will be the richer for it.

—Peterson 1997, p. 627

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aquinas, T. 1964. Summa Theologi, Book I, Questions 75 and 76. Blackfriars ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashbrook, J. 1984. Neurotheology: The working brain and the work of theology. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Scienc, 19, 331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashbrook, J. and Albright, C. 1997. The Humanizing Brain: Where Religion and Neuroscience Mee. Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine, A. 1980. City of Go. H. Bettenson (trans.). New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, I. 1990. Religion in an Age of Scienc. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Lif. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained:The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Though. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, J.A. 2004. Reconsidering fundamental issues: Emergent monism and the classical doctrine of the soul. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Scienc, 39, 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W.S., Murphy, N., and Malony, H.N. (eds.). 1998. Whatever Happened to the Soul? Scientific and the Theological Portraits of Human Natur. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, C.P.E. 2002. Divine Becoming: Rethinking Jesus and Incarnatio. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D.J. 1995. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studie, 2, 200–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.W. 2000. Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism-Dualism Debat. Grand Rapids:William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. 1994. The Astonishing Hypothesis:The Scientific Search for a Sou. London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullman, O. 1958. Immortality of the Soul or Resurrection of the DeadLondon: Epworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousnes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aquili, E. and Newberg, A. 1999. The Mystical Mind: Probing the Biology of Religious Experienc. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delio, I. 2003. Brain science and the biology of belief: A theological response. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Scienc, 38, 573–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. 1637. The Philosophical Works of Descarte. vol. 1. (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. 2001. A Mind so Rare:The Evolution of Human Consciousnes. New York:W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. (ed.) 1999. Immortalit.Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizabeth S. Haldane and Ross G.R.T. (trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feit, J.S. 2003. Probing Neurotheology’s Brain, or Critiquing an Emerging Quasi-Scienc. Paper presented to the Critical Theory and Discourses on Religion Selection, American Academy of Religion, 2003 Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA, November 22–25, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O. 2002. The Problem of the Soul:Tw o Visions of the Mind and How to Reconcile The. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillman, N. 1995. The Death of Death: Resurrection and Immortality in Jewish Though. Woodstock, VT: Jewish Lights Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsky, J. 1999. Conscience in Jewish thought, in Jayne Hoose (ed.), Conscience in World Religion. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, pp. 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewett, P.K. 1996. Who We Are: Our Dignity as Huma. Marguerite Shuster (ed.). Grand Rapids:William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. 1996. Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind–Body Problem and Mental Causatio. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, N.(Winter 1999).Downward causation and why the mental matters.CTNS Bulleti, 19 (1), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, N. and Ellis, G. 1996. On the Moral Nature of the Univers. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberg, Andrew, Eugene D’Aquili, and Vince Rause. 2001. Why God Won’t Go Away: Brain Science and the Biology of Belie. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannenberg, W. 1985. Anthropology in Theological Perspectiv. Matthew J. O’Connell (trans.). Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persinger, M. 1987. Neuropsychological Bases of God Belief. New York: Praeger Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Ted 1999. Resurrection of the very embodied soul? Russell et al. (eds.), p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. 2003. Minding God:Theology and the Congnitive Science(Minneapolis: Fortress Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G.R. 1997. Cognitive science:What one needs to know. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Scienc, 32, 615–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R.J., Murphy, N., Meyering, T.C., and Arbib, A.E. (eds.) 1999. Neuroscience and the Person: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Actio. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. 2001. Why Religion Matters:The Fate of the Human Spirit in an Age of Disbelie. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tertullian. 1978. A treatise on the soul, in Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson (eds.), Ante-Nicene Fathers.The Writings of the Fathers Down to A.D. 32. Grand Rapids:William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teske, J. 1996. The spiritual limits of neuropsychological life. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Scienc, 31, 209–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A. 1987. Christian theism and the concept of a person, in A. Peacocke and Grant Gillett (eds.), Persons and Personality:A Contemporary Inquir. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 180–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognitio. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacome, D.H. 2004. Reductionism’s demise: Cold comfort. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Scienc, 39, 321–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, K. 2002. How Do We Enter the Heart? Paths to the Heart: Sufism and the Christian Eas(especially pp. 2–23). James Cutsinger (ed.), Bloomington, IN:World Wisdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, H.A. 1993. Immortality and resurrection in the philosophy of the church fathers, in Everett Ferguson, David Scholer, and Paul Finney (eds.), Doctrines of Human Nature, Sin, and Salvation in the Early Church, vol. X, Studies in Early Christianit. New York: Garland Books, pp. 301–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizioulas, J.D. 1985. Being as Communio. Crestwood, NY: St.Vladimir’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Kelly Bulkeley (Visiting Scholar)

Copyright information

© 2005 Kelly Bulkeley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burns, C.P.E. (2005). Cognitive Science and Christian Theology. In: Bulkeley, K. (eds) Soul, Psyche, Brain: New Directions in the Study of Religion and Brain-Mind Science. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979230_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics