Abstract
In retrospect, it seems rather simplistic to think of attitudes as always being unidimensional. After all, who hasn’t experienced “mixed feelings” about people, places, and things that we have encountered or visited in our lives. Take cars, for example. Talk to anyone who drives an older-model Jaguar and he or she will probably go on about the intrinsic beauty of its design, its stability taking corners, and especially the guttural resonance of that legendary double-overhead cam engine. It is equally likely, however, that the same individual will also recount the car’s finicky behavior, and its celebrated unreliability and high maintenance. In the end, most owners of an older Jag will say they both loved and hated the car. Asked to rate the car overall on a traditional bipolar continuum, they would find such a scale inadequate to describe their feelings for the beautiful but mischievous cat.
Ambivalence is a wonderful tune to dance to. It has a rhythm all its own.
Erica Jong
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Stephen C. Craig and Michael D. Martinez
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martinez, M.D., Craig, S.C., Kane, J.G. (2005). Pros and Cons. In: Craig, S.C., Martinez, M.D. (eds) Ambivalence and the Structure of Political Opinion. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979094_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979094_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52907-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-7909-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)