Abstract
The three theoretical models of the presidential decision-making in chapter 5 capture key theoretical elements of the president’s decision to initiate economic coercion. Diagnostic tests also showed that the models were consistent across individual targets/countries. However, it is still possible that the president is systematically more likely to sanction a type of country. There are three types of countries/targets that have the potential to influence the president’s decision. First, during the Cold War, the United States directed more hostile policies toward communist nations, relative to noncommunist regimes, even if the former were not part of the Sino-Soviet bloc. Second, after the Cold War, the United States regularly pressured autocratic regimes to reform to a liberal political system. Third, the Monroe Doctrine increased U.S. involvement throughout Latin America compared with other regions of the world. All three of these examples could cause the president to act differently toward these types of states.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2005 A. Cooper Drury
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Drury, A.C. (2005). Is There a Target Selection Bias?. In: Economic Sanctions and Presidential Decisions. Advances in Foreign Policy Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403976956_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403976956_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52997-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-7695-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)