Abstract
William Jefferson Clinton defeated George Bush in the 1992 presidential election largely by focusing on the nation’s troubled domestic agenda. The Democrats’ rallying cry against Bush was ‘It’s the economy stupid!’ Clinton entered the White House in January 1993 promising to focus on the domestic problems facing Americans, and particularly the failing US economy. Nonetheless, Clinton also had to address an international agenda that was much changed from that faced by other post-Vietnam presidents. With the Cold War now firmly consigned to history, scholars, analysts and practitioners alike attempted to provide a comprehensive framework through which a far more unpredictable and potentially unstable international system could be understood. During his two terms in office, President Clinton would give an increasingly greater emphasis to foreign policy and preside over more uses of military force than any of his post-Vietnam predecessors. As a result, he would face many of the same questions regarding the continuing influence of the legacy of Vietnam. He would also draw upon the belief in American exceptionalism in an attempt to pursue a foreign policy that he claimed was not divorced from ‘the moral principles most Americans share’.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Quoted in William G. Hyland, Clinton’s World: Remaking American Foreign Policy ( Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999 ) 17.
See, for example, Larry Berman and Emily O. Goldman, ‘Clinton’s Foreign Policy at Midterm’, in Colin Campbell and Bert A. Rockman, eds, The Clinton Presidency: First Appraisals ( Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1996 ).
Emily O. Goldman and Larry Berman, ‘Engaging the World: First Impressions of the Clinton Foreign Policy Legacy’, in Colin Campbell and Bert A. Rockman, eds, The Clinton Legacy ( New York: Chatham House, 2000 ) 230.
Anthony Lake, ‘From Containment to Enlargement: Address at the School for Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, September 21, 1993’, US Department of State Dispatch, vol. 4, no. 39 (September 27, 1993 ).
James M. McCormick, ‘Clinton and Foreign Policy: Some Legacies for a New Century’, in Steven E. Schier, ed., The Postmodern Presidency: Bill Clinton’s Legacy in US Politics ( Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000 ) 60.
Madeleine K. Albright, ‘Use of Force in a Post-Cold War World: Address at the National War College, National Defense University, Fort McNair, Washington, DC, September 23, 1993’, US State Department Dispatch, vol. 4, no. 39 (September 27, 1993 ).
Martin Walker, Clinton: The President They Deserve ( London: Fourth Estate, 1996 ) 259.
See Stanley A. Renshon, High Hopes: The Clinton Presidency and the Politics of Ambition (New York: Routledge, 1998) ch. 10.
Michael G. MacKinnon, The Evolution of US Peacekeeping Policy Under Clinton: A Fairweather Friend (London: Frank Cass, 2000) ch. 2.
US Department of State, The Clinton Administration’s Policy on Reforming Multilateral Peace Operations, May 1994 (Washington, DC: US Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs, 1994 ) 4–5.
Quoted in Karin von Hippel, Democracy by Force: US Military Intervention in the Post-Cold War World ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 ) 8.
John F. Harris, ‘A Man of Caution: National Security Adviser Samuel Berger Steers a Tight Course on Kosovo’, Washington Post National Weekly Edition, May 24, 1999, 7.
Linda B. Miller, ‘The Clinton Years: Reinventing US Foreign Policy’, International Affairs, vol. 70, no. 4 (1994) 627; quoted in MacKinnon, US Peacekeeping, 78.
Richard Sobel, The Impact of Public Opinion on US Foreign Policy Since Vietnam: Constraining the Colossus ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001 ), 189.
Richard Holbrooke, To End a War (New York: Modern Library, 1999) xv, 360.
Strobe Talbott, ‘Remarks by Deputy Secretary Talbott at a State Department Town Meeting, Washington, DC, November 1, 1995’, US State Department Dispatch Supplement, vol. 6, no. 5 (December 1995).
Michael MccGwire, ‘Why Did We Bomb Belgrade?’ International Affairs, vol. 76, no. 1 (January 2000) 1–23.
Quoted in Barton Gellman, ‘With No Credible Alternative, the Allies Turned to Bombing’, Washington Post National Weekly Edition, March 29, 1999, 16.
John F. Harris, ‘And if Airstrikes Weren’t Enough… ?’ Washington Post National Weekly Edition, April 5, 1999, 9.
Barton Gellman, ‘Is This “Immaculate Coercion”? The Limits of Reliance on Air Power Become Clear in Kosovo’, Washington Post National Weekly Edition, April 5, 1999, 6.
Michael Dobbs, ‘Post-Mortem on NATO’s Bombing Campaign’, Washington Post National Weekly Edition, July 19–26, 1999, 23.
Barton Gellman, ‘US Strikes at Iraqi Targets,’ Washington Post, December 17, 1998, A01.
Eugene Robinson, ‘US Steps Up Attack on Iraq’, Washington Post, December 18, 1998, Al.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Trevor B. McCrisken
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCrisken, T.B. (2003). Bill Clinton and the ‘Indispensable Nation’. In: American Exceptionalism and the Legacy of Vietnam. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403948175_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403948175_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42917-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-4817-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)