Advertisement

The End of American Exceptionalism? The Cold War and Vietnam

  • Trevor B. McCrisken

Abstract

In 1941, Henry Luce published an influential essay in Life magazine in which he declared that the twentieth century should be considered ‘the American Century’. Luce portrayed a vision of America that continued the long tradition of regarding the United States as an exceptional nation with a special destiny. He argued that the US must ‘accept wholeheartedly our duty and our opportunity as the most powerful and vital nation in the world and in consequence to exert upon the world the full impact of our influence’. He insisted that ‘our vision of America as a world power’ must include ‘a passionate devotion to great American ideals’ such as freedom, equality of opportunity, self-reliance and independence, but also cooperation. The time had come for the US to cast aside isolationism and become ‘the powerhouse from which these ideals spread throughout the world and do their mysterious work of lifting the life of mankind from the level of the beasts to what the Psalmist called a little lower than angels’.1

Keywords

Foreign Policy American People Moral Legitimacy Free World American Foreign Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Henry R. Luce, ‘The American Century’, Life, vol$110, no. 7 (February 17, 1941 ) 61–5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    George H. Gallup, ‘Foreign Affairs, October 21, 1945’, The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion 1935–1971, Volume One, 1935–1948 ( New York: Random House, 1972 ) 534.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    Harry S Truman, ‘Address of the President of the United States - Greece, Turkey, and the Middle East (H. Doc. No. 171) ’, Congressional Record$180th Cong., 1st Sess. (March 12, 1947) vol. 93, part 2, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    X [George Kennan], ‘The Sources of Soviet Conduct’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 25, no. 4 (July 1947) 582.Google Scholar
  5. 12.
    See Mary L. Dudziak, Cold War Civil Rights (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000 ).Google Scholar
  6. 14.
    Michael E. Latham, Modernization as Ideology: American Social Science and ‘Nation-Building’ in the Kennedy Era (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2000 ) 67, 101.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    See Bruce Cumings, The Origins of the Korean War, Volume II: The Roaring of the Cataract, 1947–1950 ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990 ).Google Scholar
  8. 16.
    Harry S Truman, ‘Special Message to the Congress Reporting on the Situation in Korea, July 19, 1950’, Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Harry S. Truman, 1950 (Washington, DC: USGPO, 1965) 531–6. Hereafter, Public Papers with date.Google Scholar
  9. 20.
    William S. Turley, The Second Indochina War: A Short Political and Military History, 1954–1975 (New York: Mentor, 1987 ) 89, 201–3.Google Scholar
  10. 21.
    See, for example, Paul M. Kattenburg, The Vietnam Trauma in American Foreign Policy, 1945–75 ( New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1982 ).Google Scholar
  11. 22.
    Alexander Kendrick, The Wound Within: America in the Vietnam Years, 1945–1974 (Boston: Little, Brown, 1974 ) 4.Google Scholar
  12. 23.
    Stanley Karnow, Vietnam: A History ( New York: Viking Press, 1983 ) 9.Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    Quoted in Fred Halstead, Out Now! A Participant’s Account of the American Movement Against the Vietnam War ( New York: Monad Press, 1978 ) 41–2.Google Scholar
  14. 26.
    David W. Levy, The Debate Over Vietnam, 2nd edn ( Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995 ) 46.Google Scholar
  15. 27.
    For a full debate over the legal aspects of US intervention in Vietnam see Richard A. Falk, ed., The Vietnam War and International Law, 4 vols (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968–76).Google Scholar
  16. 28.
    US Congress, Senate, S. J. Res. 189, Congressional Record, 88th Cong., 2nd Sess. (August 5, 1964) vol. 110, part 14, 18133.Google Scholar
  17. 29.
    Loren Baritz, Backfire: A History of How American Culture Led Us into Vietnam and Made Us Fight the Way We Did ( New York: Ballantine, 1985 ) 128–9Google Scholar
  18. George C. Herring, America’s Longest War: The United States and Vietnam, 1950–1975, 2nd edn ( New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1986 ) 119–23Google Scholar
  19. and Neil Sheehan, A Bright Shining Lie: John Paul Vann and America in Vietnam ( New York: Vintage Books, 1988 ) 379.Google Scholar
  20. 32.
    Anthony A. D’Amato, Harvey L. Gould and Larry D. Woods, ‘Bombardment of Non-Military Targets’, in ’War Crimes and Vietnam: The “Nuremburg Defense” and the Military Service Resister’, California Law Review, vol. 57 (November 1969) reprinted in Falk, The Vietnam War and International Law, vol. 3, 433–43.Google Scholar
  21. 33.
    Todd Gitlin, The Sixties: Years of Hope, Days of Rage ( New York: Bantam, 1989 ) 265.Google Scholar
  22. 34.
    Bill Moyers, ‘What is Left of Conscience?’ Saturday Review, February 13, 1971, reprinted in Steven Cohen, Vietnam: Anthology and Guide to a Television History ( New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1983 ) 379.Google Scholar
  23. 35.
    See Telford Taylor, Nuremberg and Vietnam: An American Tragedy ( Chicago: Quadrangle, 1970 ).Google Scholar
  24. 36.
    Quoted in J. Justin Gustainis, American Rhetoric and the Vietnam War ( Westport, CT: Praeger, 1993 ) 44.Google Scholar
  25. 37.
    Frances FitzGerald, Fire in the Lake: The Vietnamese and the Americans in Vietnam (New York: Atlantic-Little, 1972; Vintage Books, 1989) 455.Google Scholar
  26. 39.
    John E. Mueller, War, Presidents, and Public Opinion ( New York: John Wiley, 1973 ) 54–7.Google Scholar
  27. 46.
    Leslie H. Gelb and Richard K. Betts, The Irony of Vietnam: The System Worked ( Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1979 ) 349–50.Google Scholar
  28. 52.
    Frank Snepp, Decent Interval: The American Debacle in Vietnam and the Fall of Saigon ( New York: Random House, 1977 ).Google Scholar
  29. 55.
    J. William Fulbright, The Arrogance of Power (New York: Vintage, 1966) 4–5, 20–1, 245–7, 254–6.Google Scholar
  30. 56.
    Robert E. Lane and Michael Lerner, ‘Why Hard Hats Hate Hairs’, Psychology Today (November 1970) 45, quoted in Gustainis, American Rhetoric, 110.Google Scholar
  31. 58.
    Quoted in Kenneth J. Heineman, Campus Wars: The Peace Movement at American State Universities in the Vietnam Era ( New York: New York University Press, 1993 ) 89.Google Scholar
  32. 61.
    Daniel Yankelovich, ‘A Crisis of Moral Legitimacy?’ Dissent (Fall 1974) 526–7, 530–2.Google Scholar
  33. 64.
    See Louis Fisher, Presidential War Power (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1995) ch. 6–9.Google Scholar
  34. 65.
    See, for example, Ole R. Holsti and James N. Rosenau, American Leadership in World Affairs: Vietnam and the Breakdown of Consensus (Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1984 )Google Scholar
  35. Richard A. Melanson, American Foreign Policy Since the Vietnam War: The Search for Consensus from Nixon to Clinton, 2nd edn (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1996) ch. 1.Google Scholar
  36. 66.
    See, for example, Richard Nixon, No More Vietnams ( London: W. H. Allen, 1986 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Trevor B. McCrisken 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trevor B. McCrisken
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WarwickUK

Personalised recommendations