Abstract
St Petersburg was unique. As far as administration is concerned, it was the unique composition of the population of the city which was most significant. The most obvious point of distinctiveness of St Petersburg compared with other Russian towns was the presence of the following: the court and courtiers; large numbers of bureaucrats, officials and clerical staff who were employed in the offices of state; the wealthiest nobles and their serf retinues; army and naval officers resident in the city between campaigns or employed in ministries; foreigners in many professions; the scholars, scientists and artists associated with the academies; a small number of very wealthy merchants. Contemporary statistical information on city population in late eighteenth-century Russia has to be treated with caution but it at least demonstrates something of the oddity of St Petersburg. In 1801 it has been estimated that the ‘townspeople’ of the city (the merchants and the artisans, the meshchane) numbered some 38,000 persons, but they were collectively outnumbered by 13,200 members of the nobility, 26,100 servants, 39,100 soldiers and officers and over 50,000 peasants.1 In addition, the transience of the population of the city was also distinctive, not only in the number of wealthy nobles who retired for the summer months to their country estates, and in the movement of foreign and Russian merchants back and forth from the city but also the army of transient peasants and workers who supplied a city without a natural economic hinterland with foodstuffs, hand-made goods and labour.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
G.E. Munro, ‘The Development of St Petersburg as an Urban Center during the Reign of Catherine II (1762–1796)’ (PhD thesis, North Carolina, 1973), p. 280.
George Munro, ‘The Charter to the Towns Reconsidered: the St Petersburg Connection’, Canadian-American Slavic Studies, XXIII, 1 (1989) 17–35.
H.F. von Storch, The Picture of Petersburg (London, 1801), p. 88.
D.I. Bagalei and D.P. Miller, Istoriia goroda Khar’kova za 250 let ego sushchestveniia (s 1655 po 1905-y god), I (Khar’kov, 1905), 110.
A.A. Kizevetter, Gorodskoe polozhenie Ekateriny II 1785 g. (Moscow, 1909), pp. 358–62.
R.E. Jones, ‘Catherine II and the Provincial Reform of 1775 – a Question of Motivation’, Canadian Slavic Studies, IV (1970) 511.
See J.M. Hartley, A Social History of the Russian Empire 1650–1825 (London and New York, 1999), pp. 94–6.
A. Voronov, Istoriko-statisticheskoe obozrenie uchebnykh zavadenii S. Peterburgskago uchebnago okruga s 1715 po 1828 god vkliuchitel’no (St Petersburg, 1849), p. 69.
45. RGADA, fond 16, delo 523, f. 5, report by M. Dolgorukii and A. Naryshkin from St Petersburg, 1785.
47. P.G. Kicheev, Iz nedavnei stariny – razskazy i vospominaniia (Moscow, 1870), pp. 99–103.
W. Bruce Lincoln, ‘N.A. Miliutin and the St Petersburg Municipal Act of 1846: A Study in Reform under Nicholas I’, Slavic Review, XXXIII (1974) 49–68.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hartley, J.M. (2003). Governing the City: St Petersburg and Catherine II’s Reforms. In: Cross, A. (eds) St Petersburg, 1703–1825. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403937469_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403937469_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51241-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-3746-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)