Abstract
The first period of Japanese emigration to Brazil runs from 1908 to 1919. In these years, arriving Japanese endured the process of cultural acclimatisation common to other migrant groups in the country and familiar to Japanese emigrants in other societies. This process involved moving from a near complete ignorance of the basic mechanisms of daily life, including simple phrases of language, common foods, and social customs, to a level of understanding which allowed them at least to function within certain sectors of Brazilian society, especially agricultural production and petty retailing. The next level of familiarity leading on to greater prosperity was to be reached in the 1920s. What became evident from the early years is that Japanese migrants had a very clear sense of their own minds and were perfectly capable either of enduring hardship, adapting to adversity, or protesting against mistreatment. In this, they were far more than the victims of circumstance they often appear in Japanese-language histories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Takahashi Yukiharu, Nikkei Burajiru Iminshi, Tokyo 1993, p. 25, quoting from Asahi Shimbun (Osaka), 29 April 1908.
Mita Chiyoko, citing works of Ono Kazuichirō, in Imin Kenkyūkai(ed.), Nihon no Imin Kenkyū: Dōkō to Mokuroku, Tokyo 1994, p. 37.
Tsuji Kotarō, Burajiru no Dōhō o Tazunete, Tokyo 1930, p. 3.
Details of the 1908 voyage, Takahashi 1993, pp. 31–9; Aoyagi Ikutarō, Burajiru ni okeru Nihonjin Hattenshi, Tokyo 1941, p. 271.
Takahashi 1993, p. 43 for details of migrant age and literacy levels. Migrant statistics also in Aoyagi 1941, p. 269; Handa Tomoo, Imin no Seikatsu no Rekishi: Burajiru Nikkeijin no Ayunda Michi, Sao Paulo 1970, p. 53. On the Sao Paulo government system of subsidised migration from the 1890s, Thomas H. Holloway, Immigrants on the Land: Coffee and Society in Sao Paulo, 1886–1934, Chapel Hill 1980, pp. 45–9.
Toyama Ichirō, ‘“Kōminka” to imin: kindai Okinawa no kunō’, Sasaki Takashi and Yamada Akira (eds), Shin-shiten Nihon no Rekishi, vol. 6, Tokyo 1993, p. 247. Peruvian case,
John K. Emmerson, The Japanese Thread: A Life in the U.S. Foreign Service, NY 1978, p. 131.
Differing causes in west and east Japanese migration, Imin Kenkyūkai 1994, pp. 22–30; Yoshida Keiko, ‘Higashi Nihon ni okeru Meiji-ki dekasegi imin no jittai: Meiji 31-nen-45-nen no Fukushima-ken dekasegi imin ryoken deeta kara’, Ijū Kenkyū, 29, March 1992, pp. 75–81. On the role of precedent in influencing clusters of migration even in a largely non-agrarian region, see Burajiru Fukui Kenjinkai Kaihō Henshūbu, ed., Burajiru to Fukui Kenjin, Sao Paulo 1961, p. 269.
Rodrigues Alves speech 1901, plus journalist’s quote, Jeffrey D. Needell, ‘Rio de Janeiro and Buenos Aires: public space and public consciousness in fin-de-siècle Latin America’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 37–3, July 1995, pp. 532–3. On the reconstruction and hygienic improvement of Rio, see also
Frank G. Carpenter, Along the Parana and the Amazon, NY 1925, pp. 211–13;
E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2nd edn, NY 1980, pp. 314–5.
George Reid Andrews, ‘Brazilian racial democracy, 1900–90: an American counterpoint’, Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 31, 3, 1996, p. 485.
Takahashi 1993, p. 48; Aoyagi 1941, p. 274. Hawaiian co-regional groups and dialect, Alan Takeo Moriyama, Imingaisha: Japanese Emigration Companies and Hawaii, 1894–1908, Honolulu 1985, p. 23; North American example,
Roger Daniels, Asian America: Chinese and Japanese in the United States since 1850, Seattle 1988, p. 166.
Migrant diet, Takahashi 1993, pp. 75–6; Handa 1970, pp. 91–107. 1920s food problems, Seko Yoshinobu, Burajiru Kaisōki, Gifu 1979, pp. 4–6, 10–11. List of cultural differences between Japanese and Westerners, Seishū Shimpō (SS), 29 April 1932.
Wakayama-kenshi Hensan Iinkai (ed.), Wakayama-kenshi: Kin-gendai 1, Wakayama 1989, pp. 1008–9.
Tsuji 1930, pp. 55–6, 64. Holloway 1980, pp. 73–88, 99–101. Ōshima Kiichi, Hōjin no Hattenchi Burajiru Saikin Jijō, Tokyo 1928, pp. 63–8, insisted at great length that farm life in Brazil, in direct contrast to the situation in Japan, meant good food to eat and money to be earned. As he put it, ‘Whoever you are, no-one ever struggles to eat...[and] I can guarantee that there is absolutely no difficulty in life in Brazil’. An article on Brazil as ‘a paradise for workers’ also appeared in BJ, 1 January 1932. Contrast this with Mita Chiyoko, ‘Ninon to Burajiru o musubu Nikkeijin’, Gaikō Jihō, no. 1265, February 1990, p. 43, which describes plantation conditions simply as ‘generally cruel’.
San Pauro Jimbun Kagaku Kenkyūjo, Burajiru Nihon Iminshi Nempyō, Akita 1997, pp. 32–6.
Ikeda Shigeji, Kagoshima-kenjin Burajiru Ishokumin-shi, Sao Paulo 1941, pp. 36–8.
Rio modernisation and street traders, Gilberto Freyre, Order and Progress: Brazil From Monarchy to Republic, NY 1970, p. 275. Onaga on problems with fellow Okinawan migrants, BJ, 17 January 1919, 16 May 1919. Bans on Okinawan emigration, Shiroma Zenkichi, Zai-Haku Okinawa Kenjin 50-nen no Ayumi, Sao Paulo 1959, pp. 259–60. Compare this with the offhand comment of Toake Endoh, ‘Shedding the unwanted: Japan’s emigration policy’, Japan Policy Research Institute, Working Paper no. 72, October 2000, p. 6, which insists that the Japanese government felt no need to push Oki-nawans to emigrate because, unlike the migrants from south and western Japan, they were not a militant political threat to Japan’s domestic order.
Figures from Mita Chiyoko, ‘Burajiru no imin seisaku to Nihon imin: Beikoku hai-Nichi undō no hankyō no ichi jirei to shite’, p. 443, in Miwa Kimitada (ed.), Nichi-Bei Kiki no Kigen to Hai-Nichi Iminhō, Tokyo 1997.
Development company and its backers, BJ, 1 January 1919; San Pauro Jimbun Kagaku Kenkyūjo 1997, p. 32. From 1919, the company was merged with others in the grouping known as Kaikō. On Katsura and emigration, Stewart Lone, Army, Empire and Politics in Meiji Japan, London 2000.
Brazilian social norms, Darrell E. Levi, The Prados of Sao Paulo, Brazil: An Elite Family and Social Change, 1840–1930, Athens GA. 1987, pp. 5–7;
Roberto Da Matta, ‘Carnival in multiple planes’, p. 225, in John J. Mac-Aloon (ed.), Rite, Drama, Festival, Spectacle: Rehearsals Toward a Theory of Cultural Performance, Philadelphia 1984. See also
Rudyard Kipling, Brazilian Sketches, Bromley 1989, p. 58, for the comment made to him on a visit in 1927 that, in Brazil, ‘face’ was all-important and that ‘mutual accommodation from highest to humblest was the rule’.
Development of Sao Paulo city, Richard M. Morse, From Community to Metropolis: A Biography of Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2nd edn, NY 1974, pp. 8–32, quote on street lighting, p. 72, livestock in city streets, p. 126.
Copyright information
© 2001 Stewart Lone
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lone, S. (2001). Arriving: the Early Japanese in Brazil, 1908–19. In: The Japanese Community in Brazil, 1908–1940. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403932792_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403932792_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39468-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-3279-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)