Skip to main content
  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

The history of girls and the twentieth-century juvenile justice system is a history more than usually marked by both continuity and change. Old behaviours were constantly transformed by new explanations and old methods of reform constantly transmuted by new rationales. Girls were, for some, ‘always’ getting ‘worse’, while measures to deal with them were, for others, ‘always’ getting ‘better’. Any summary of the broad developments covered in this book needs to try to capture something of the dynamic senses of time that were present in this, or indeed any, historical ‘period’. It needs to show how the choices made and actions performed by all the actors involved in the multiple processes that constituted ‘the’ juvenile justice system, from the highest official to the lowest young shoplifter, were shaped by both individual and collective senses of pasts, presents and futures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for example, Bailey, Delinquency and Citizenship; J. Pitts, The Politics of Juvenile Crime (London: Sage, 1988); D. Farrington, ‘Trends in English Juvenile Delinquency and Their Explanation’, International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 16 (1992) 151–68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. In this it has sought to extend the arguments presented in Harris and Webb, Welfare, Power and Juvenile Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Report of the Committee on Children and Young Persons (Ingleby Committee), 1960, Cmnd 1191; Labour Party, Crime: A Challenge to Us All (London: Labour Party, 1964); Home of fice, The Child, the Family and the Young of fender (London: HMSO, 1965); Home of fice, Children in Trouble (London: HMSO, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chesney-Lind, ‘Juvenile Delinquency: The Sexualisation of Female Crime’, and ‘Judicial Paternalism and the Female Status of fender: Training Women to Know Their Place’, Crime and Delinquency, 23 (1977) 121–9; L.S. Smith, ‘Sexist Assumptions and Female Delinquency: An Empirical Investigation’, and D. Wilson, ‘Sexual Codes and Conduct: A Study of Teenage Girls’, both in Smart and Smart (eds), Women, Sexuality and Social Control; Ackland, Girls in Care; Gelsthorpe, Sexism and the Female of fender; Hudson, ‘Justice or Welfare?’.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Gelsthorpe, Sexism and the Female of fender; and Cox, ‘Defining and Controlling the Female Juvenile Delinquent: Burford House 1950–1970’.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See A. Giddens, The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Pamela Cox

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cox, P. (2003). Redefining. In: Gender, Justice and Welfare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919847_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics