Abstract
The call in recent years for historians of Russia to show sensitivity to language and semiotics in their research is especially relevant to studying the history of the Russian peasant. Peasants were quintessential ‘others’ in Russian society; they were an objectified class which was ‘spoken for, debated over, represented and categorised, central to any vision of future polity, but excluded from the process of envisioning it’.1 The historiography of the Russian peasant in the nineteenth and early twentieth century shows that at that time there was no universal understanding of ‘peasantry’; rather, it was a category that was ambiguous and contested. In addition to the legal definition of a peasant as a person born into a particular social estate, there were numerous competing understandings of the category that projected a range of personal qualities, and social and political attributes, onto peasants. Educated Russians might be touched by the idea of the peasant as a primordial human being or, alternatively, impatient with peasant ‘backwardness’, but their imaginings always dramatized the distance between themselves and the peasants. The Stolypin Land Reform was an important moment in this process of ‘othering’ the Russian peasant.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Daniel Field, Rebels in the Name of the Tsar (Boston, Mass., 1976) p. 213.
Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison (London, 1987) p. 143.
R. Stites, Revolutionary Dreams: Utopian Vision and Experimental Life in the Russian Revolution (Oxford, 1989) p. 19.
G. Yaney, The Urge to Mobilize: Agrarian Reform in Russia, 1861–1930 (Urbana, 1982) pp. 367–79.
J. Pallot, ‘Khutora and otruba in Stolypin’s Program of Farm Re-organisation’, Slavic Review, vol. 42, no. 2 (1984) pp. 242–5.
A. A. Kofod, Khutorskoe razselenie (St Petersburg, 1907).
A. A. Kofod, Krestianskie khutora na nadel’noi zemle, 2 vols (St Petersburg, 1905).
A. A. Kofod, Russkoe Zemleustroistvo (St Petersburg, 1914).
Orlando Figes, A People’s Tragedy: The Russian Revolution, 1891–1924 (London, 1996) pp. 232–9.
A. Solovev, ‘Kak ia vydelilsia iz obshchiny i pervye moi shaga na otrube’, Sel’skokhoziaistvennyi listok (Tver, May 1914).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2001 Palgrave Publishers Ltd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pallot, J. (2001). The Stolypin Land Reform as ‘Administrative Utopia’: Images of Peasantry in Nineteenth-Century Russia. In: Palat, M.K. (eds) Social Identities in Revolutionary Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919687_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919687_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42556-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1968-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)