Abstract
In recent times, where identity has been associated with ‘a mode of being’ and ‘claims to a capacity for action or change’, the distinction between what exists and what might provide legitimacy to action is clearly crucial to the point at issue.1 This is especially so in the case of ‘regional identity’ in Russia; for it has been the dissociation of ‘claims to a capacity for action or change’ here from the connotations of the region in terms of historical and social attributes (except in the Ukraine, Siberia and the Lower Volga), that has left the identity of the locality unattended except as a focus of kraevedenie, that is, the study of an area for its own sake. Otherwise, regional and national identity in Russia has been dealt with in standard terms: that is ‘construction’ (intellectual and social)2 and with regard to religion ethnicity, sensibility and political economy. In such cases, identity is linked directly to territorial and political claims, and a clear interconnection is apparent in the very rhetoric which accompanies ‘claims’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A. Touraine, Return of the Actor: Social Theory in Post-Industrial Society (Minnesota, 1988) p. 81.
V. S. Diakin, ‘Den’gi dlia sel’skogo khoziaistva’, Istoriia SSSR, no. 3 (1991) p. 73ff.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2001 Palgrave Publishers Ltd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vasudevan, H. (2001). Identity and Politics in Provincial Russia: Tver, 1889–1905. In: Palat, M.K. (eds) Social Identities in Revolutionary Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919687_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919687_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42556-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1968-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)