Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter explores the discursive and non-discursive potential of the body through a consideration of flirtation. I choose to raise this topic because it questions treating the body as primarily the object of discourse. I also question the notion that the body might somehow lie outside discourse altogether, meaning that it is not subject to how people think and talk about social life. Instead, this chapter acknowledges that flirtation is possible only because people employ discourse to frame their actions. However, more important still, it argues that flirting is done only by people who are embodied (who are not just have bodies), and that this crucially involves the use of symbolic gesture. This means that any consideration of this topic must take due account of how people flirt, not just what they say about, or even during, flirting. The act of flirting must necessarily involve knowledge practices, and with that the idea of a discourse of sexuality, so that the schemes involved here can well be thought of as discursively ordered. In that case, why choose flirting rather than some other social activity? The simple answer is that flirting involves the body in ways that many other activities do not. Flirting directly implicates the body at two levels, as it were, as being both the medium and the object of communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bateson, G. (1987) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edley, N. (2001) ‘Unravelling social constructionism’. Theory & Psychology 11: 433–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1995) ‘Two to Tango: Script Formulations, Dispositions, and Rhetorical Symmetry in Relationship Troubles Talk’. Research in Language and Social Interaction 28: 319–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., Ashmore, M. and Potter, J. (1995) ‘Death and Furniture: Arguments Against Relativism’. History of the Human Sciences 8: 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1972) ‘Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight’. Daedalus 101: 1–3 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1951) ‘Symbols of Class Status’. British Journal of Sociology 2: 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1976) ‘Gender Advertisements’. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1968) Languages of Art: an Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. and Gillet, G. (1994) The Discursive Mind. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S.K. (1957) Philosophy in a New Key: a Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite and Art. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1998) ‘How to be Iconophilic in Art, Science and Religion?’ In C. Jones and P. Galison (eds) Picturing Science Producing Art. New York: Routledge, 418–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1972) ‘Techniques of the Body’. Economy and Society 2: 70–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception (trans. Colin Smith). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968) The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (1990) ‘Discourse: Definitions and Contradictions’. Philosophical Psychology 3: 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1994) On Flirtation. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radley, A. (1995) ‘The Elusory Body and Social Constructionist Theory’. Body & Society 1 (2): 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radley, A. (1996) ‘Displays and Fragments: Embodiment and the Configuration of Social Worlds’. Theory & Psychology 6: 559–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1984) Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality and Love. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicot, D.W. (1971) Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2003 Alan Radley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Radley, A. (2003). Flirting. In: Coupland, J., Gwyn, R. (eds) Discourse, the Body, and Identity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403918543_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics