Skip to main content

Transcending the Object in Embodied Interaction

  • Chapter
Discourse, the Body, and Identity

Abstract

Despite a burgeoning body of studies concerned with the analysis of naturally occurring talk and discourse, relatively few augment their analyses with a consideration of the ways in which the body and material artefacts feature in, and work with, talk. In particular it is rather surprising to note that little analytic attention has been concerned with the ways in which talk and gesture combine over, around and with objects to produce meaningful discourse. For example, studies of discourse, particularly analyses of accounts of physical objects, rarely consider the ways in which the body enriches and elaborates talk about documents, paintings, tools, technologies and other aspects of material culture. In this chapter, we will explore how talk and embodied conduct is used to ‘animate’ or enliven physical objects in co-present interaction. Moreover, we will consider the ways in which individuals interweave talk and gesture over and around inanimate objects seemingly to infuse them with character and actions: character and actions that may otherwise remain unavailable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Büscher, M. (2001) Ideas in the Making: Talk, Vision, Objects and Embodied Action in Multi-media Art and Landscape Architecture. Ph.D thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büscher, M. and Shapiro, D. (2000) Vision at Work. London: Queen Mary & Westfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, J. (1970) ‘Behaviour in Private Places: Sustaining Definitions of Reality in Gynecological Examinations’, in H.P. Dreitzel (ed.) Recent Sociology. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1981) Conversational Organisation: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. in press ‘Pointing as a Situated Practice’. In S. Kita (ed.) Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1994) ‘Professional Vision’ American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1995) ‘Seeing in Depth’ Social Studies of Science 25 (2, May): 237–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M.H. (1992) Professional Vision. Plenary Lecture Presented at the International Conference on Discourse and the Professions, Uppsala, Sweden, August 28, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greatbatch, D., Luff, P., Heath, C.C. and Campion, P. (1993) ‘Interpersonal Communication and Human—Computer Interaction: an Examination of the Use of Computers in Medical Consultations’. Interacting with Computers 5 (2): 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C.C. (1986) Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C.C. (forthcoming) ‘Demonstrative Suffering: The Gestural (Re)embodiment of Symptoms’ Journal of Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C.C. (1989) ‘Pain Talk: the Expression of Suffering in the Medical Consultation’ Social Psychology Quarterly 52 (2): 113–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C.C. (1992) The Delivery and Reception of Diagnosis in the General Practice Consultation’, in Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, Drew, P. and Heirtage, J. (eds) Cambridge University Press, 235–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C.C. and Hindmarsh, J. (2002) ‘Analysing Interaction: Video, ethnography and situated conduct’, in T. May (ed.) Qualitative Research: An International Guide to Practice. London: Sage, 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C.C. and Hindmarsh, J. (2000) ‘Configuring Action in Objects: From Mutual Space to Media Space’, Mind, Culture and Activity 7 (1/2): 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C.C. and Luff, P.K. (2000) Technology in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J.C. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindmarsh, J. and Heath, C. (2000) ‘Embodied Reference: A Study of Deixis in Workplace Interaction’. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1855–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindmarsh, J. and Heath, C. (2000) ‘Sharing the Tools of the Trade: The Interactional Constitution of Workplace Objects’. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 29 (5): 523–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschauer, S. (1991) ‘The Manufacture of Bodies in Surgery’, Social Studies of Science 21: 279–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1984) ‘Transcript Notation’, in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ix—xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1982) ‘The Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction: Observations on the Development of a Methodology’, in K. Scherer and P. Ekman (eds) Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behavior Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (2000) ‘Language and Gesture: Unity of Duality?’ in D. McNeil (ed.) Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1992) ‘Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts’, in W.E. Bijker and J. Law (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, C. and Streeck, J. (2000) ‘Gestures, Knowledge, and the World’, in D. McNeil (ed.) Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1977) Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Paterson, M. Haptic Spaces. PhD thesis in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures in Conversation: Volumes I and II. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, J. (1996) ‘How To Do Things With Things: Objets Trouvés and Symbolization’. Human Studies 19 (4): 365–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieder, D.L. (1974) ‘Telling the Code’, in R. Turner (ed.) Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, A.J. (1994) ‘Object Transfer, Intersubjectivity and Third Person Repair: Early Developmental Observations of One Child’. Journal of Child Language 21: 543–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2003 Jon Hindmarsh and Christian Heath

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hindmarsh, J., Heath, C. (2003). Transcending the Object in Embodied Interaction. In: Coupland, J., Gwyn, R. (eds) Discourse, the Body, and Identity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403918543_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics