Skip to main content

Part of the book series: One Europe or Several? ((OES))

  • 34 Accesses

Abstract

It is the argument of this chapter that while the Russian High Command still aspires to a Power Projection type of military, the ‘real’ situation within the Russian armed forces more closely resembles what Forster et al. called a Territorial Defence type of military.1 Indeed, this chapter suggests that the situation within the Russian army is so bad — and getting worse — that the Russian armed forces are better conceptualised as a ‘deprofessionalising Territorial Defence’ type. The Russian military is only capable of power projection if it receives assistance from outside the country. Even more serious, it is increasingly unable to provide even for the territorial defence of the country. In short, in spite of Sergei Ivanov’s appointment as Defence Minister in March 2001, the outlook for the Russian military appears to be worsening on a daily basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. T. J. Colton, Commissars, Commanders and Civilian Authority: the Structure of Soviet Military Politics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979), and ‘The Party-Military Connection: a Participatory Model’, in

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Herspring and I. Volgyes (eds), Civil-Military Relations in Communist Systems (Boulder: Westview, 1978), 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. S. Grachev, Voennaya Entsiklopediya, Vol. 3 (Moscow: Voennoe izdatel’stvo, 1995), 101.

    Google Scholar 

  4. This issue is discussed in some detail in D. R. Herspring, Russian Civil-Military Relations (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996), 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. R. Herspring, The Soviet High Command, 1967–1989 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990), 248–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herspring, D.R. (2002). Deprofessionalising the Russian Armed Forces. In: Forster, A., Edmunds, T., Cottey, A. (eds) The Challenge of Military Reform in Postcommunist Europe. One Europe or Several?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403914293_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics