Abstract
This chapter examines the empirical relationship between electoral systems, party system characteristics, cabinet stability and the fate of pluralist democracy in interwar Europe. Its main objective is to test basic notions in a literature which has been characterized by Lawrence Mayer (1980b: 335) as follows:
The collapse of parliamentary democracies in Europe prior to World War II generated a search for the internal weakness of such systems. Out of this search came a suggestion from several quarters that multiparty parliamentary democracies were more prone to cabinet instability than were two-party systems. Parliamentary democracies, beset with such cabinet instability, cannot govern effectively. Therefore, it was suggested, such unstable systems were readily replaced by more authoritarian political regimes that appeared better able to provide for the efficient functioning of that system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karvonen, L., Quenter, S. (2002). Electoral Systems, Party System Fragmentation and Government Instability. In: Berg-Schlosser, D., Mitchell, J. (eds) Authoritarianism and Democracy in Europe, 1919–39. Advances in Political Science: An International Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403914231_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403914231_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42826-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1423-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)