Advertisement

Money for the People: Economic and Monetary Union

  • Peter Cullen

Abstract

Perhaps the most supranational initiative within Europe has been the move towards monetary union, as Bradley argued in Chapter 3. To clarify these issues, the theory of monetary union will be explored in this chapter and the policy responses of Britain and Italy will be compared. Full economic and monetary union (EMU) requires two or more regions or states to adopt common macroeconomic policies and a universally acceptable currency. Within most states of the EU, the euro is that currency. Although various institutions are developing economic responsibilities and competencies, they appear to be insufficiently powerful and wide-ranging to perform the functions demanded for true EMU. The economic arguments for and against monetary union in Europe rest on one very simple proposition. Under what circumstances is it advantageous for a particular geographical area to have one currency? Unfortunately, while the question is simple, the answer is complex.

Keywords

Exchange Rate Interest Rate Foreign Direct Investment Monetary Policy House Price 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buiter, W. Corsetti, G. and Roubini, N. ‘1993 Sense and Nonsense in the Treaty of Maastricht’, Economic Policy, vol. 37, pp. 63–84Google Scholar
  2. Economist Intelligence Unit (1999) Country Report: Italy, 1st QuarterGoogle Scholar
  3. Eurobarometer, (1998) Eurobarometer, 49, Spring, via http://europa.eu.intGoogle Scholar
  4. European Commission (1999a) European Economy Annual Economic Report No. 67 (EC, Brussels)Google Scholar
  5. European Commission (1999b) Eurostat Yearbook: A Statistical Eye on Europe, 1998/9 edition (EC, Luxembourg)Google Scholar
  6. Eurostat (1999) Eurostat Yearbook, Edition 98/99 (EC, Brussels)Google Scholar
  7. Gallup (1997) Political and Economic Index, No. 405 (January)Google Scholar
  8. Hansen J. D. and Nielsen, J. U.-M. (1997) An Economic Analysis of the EU 2nd edn. (McGraw Hill-London)Google Scholar
  9. Kenen, P. B. (ed.) (1995) Economic and Monetary Union in Europe: Moving Beyond Maastricht (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)Google Scholar
  10. Mundell, R. A. (1961) ‘A Theory of Optimum Currency Azas’, American Economic Review 51, No. 4, pp. 657–65Google Scholar
  11. OECD (1999) Main Economic Indicators, August 1999Google Scholar
  12. Sherwen, P. and Jones, R. (1999) ‘The Euro and You’, The Guardian, 23 OctoberGoogle Scholar
  13. Tsoukalis, L. (1997) The New European Economy Revisited (Oxford University Press, Oxford)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Publishers Ltd 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Cullen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations