Skip to main content
  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

The crisis broke on Christmas Day, 1963, and did not subside until towards the end of the following year. Throughout this period many members of the Western alliance were anxious – severely so on occasion – about the threat presented to their interests by events in Cyprus. Most notably was this true of Britain, the ex-colonial overlord, who had retained a foothold on the island. But the United States was not far behind Britain in her concern; and many of Nato’s other members were also exercised about the matter. In consequence, they were emphatic about the need for a very early restoration of internal calm, and also clear that to keep the crisis off the boil some form of third-party intervention was required. Not all of them displayed a comparable keenness to contribute to it; indeed, there was a discernible reluctance to get involved. But that did not mean that the declaratory statements of the Western states lacked substance. The Cyprus crisis caused genuine, and sometimes acute, alarm. Only France, expressing her leader’s disdain for Anglo-Saxon states, tended to dissociate herself from this concern. And even she would without doubt have been deeply worried had the crisis got out of hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See further, W.L. Dale (Legal Adviser at the CRO), Time Past Time Present. An Autobiography (London: Butterworths, 1994) 167.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K.A. Kyriakides, ‘British Cold War Strategy and the Struggle to Maintain Military Bases in Cyprus, 1951–60’ (University of Cambridge: PhD dissertation, 1996) 161.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Air Chief Marshall Sir David Lee, Wings in the Sun. A History of the Royal Air Force in the Mediterranean, 1945–1986 (London: HMSO, 1989) 184.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For sigint generally, see M. Herman, Intelligence Power in Peace and War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. See T. Bower, The Perfect English Spy. Sir Dick White and the Secret War 1935–90 (London: Heinemann, 1995) 90.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See R.D. Landa, J.E. Miller, D.S. Patterson and C.S. Simpson (eds), Foreign Relations of the United States, 1958–1960, Vol. X, Part 1, Eastern Europe Region; Soviet Union; Cyprus (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1993), 820: National Security Council, ‘Statement of U.S. Policy Toward Cyprus’, NSC 6003, 9 February 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  7. But the United States was unwilling to pay the amount Makarios demanded, it ‘being well out of line with prices paid for other stations’: J.E. Miller (ed.), Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963, Vol. XVI, Eastern Europe; Cyprus; Greece; Turkey (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1994) 527, 533–4, and 537, n. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The position of United States’ intelligence and communication facilities in Cyprus was regularized by an Exchange of Letters between the two states on 22 January 1968: see, B. O’Malley and I. Craig, The Cyprus Conspiracy. America, Espionage and the Turkish Invasion (London: Tauris, 1999) 129.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See also, for a reference to ‘Egyptian aggressive aspirations’, PRO: DEFE 11/452, Annex to DP.79/64(Final), the covering note with which is dated 10 June 1964; and, for the view that Egypt’s record in encouraging subversion and insurgency during the 1960s was ‘second to none’, Frank Kitson, Low Intensity Operations. Subversion, Insurgency and Peacekeeping (London: Faber, 1971; pbk edn 1991), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Turkey was said to have a ‘very limited amphibious capability’: PRO: WO 305/3094, Ankara to FO 188, 29 January 1964; see also G.S. Harris, Troubled Alliance (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1972) 107,

    Google Scholar 

  11. quoted in C.W. McCaskill, ‘Cyprus Twenty-Five Years Later: An American Diplomat Looks Back’, Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 9 (1991) 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. See C. Foley (ed.), The Memoirs of General Grivas (London: Longman, 1964) 97, 127, and 172.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Verrier, ‘Cyprus: Britain’s Security Role’, The World Today, 20 (1964) 132, observed that a small number of terrorists could wreak havoc at Akrotiri airfield.

    Google Scholar 

  14. It was then closed, the transmitter being passed to the BBC: R. Beeston: Looking for Trouble. The Life and Times of a Foreign Correspondent (London: Brassey’s, 1997) 23–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Robertson, The Justice Game (London: Chatto & Windus, 1998) 105.

    Google Scholar 

  16. This and the next three paragraphs rely heavily on Lee (n. 4); A.J. Pierre, Nuclear Politics. The British Experience with an Independent Strategic Force, 1939–1970 (London: Oxford University Press, 1972);

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Wynn, The RAF Strategic Nuclear Deterrent Forces: Their Origins, Roles and Deployment, 1946–1969. A Documentary History (London: HMSO, 1994); and on interviews.

    Google Scholar 

  18. I also made use of A.S. Bennell, Defence Policy and the Royal Air Force 1964–1970 (London: Ministry of Defence, Air Historical Branch, 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Brookes, V Force. The History of Britain’s Airborne Deterrent (London: Janes, 1982);

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. Brown, ‘Britain’s Strategic Weapons. I. Manned Bombers’, The World Today, 20 (1964);

    Google Scholar 

  21. I. Clark, Nuclear Diplomacy and the Special Relationship. Britain’s Deterrent and America, 1957–1962 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994); Kyriakides (n. 3); and Verrier (n. 41).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. But this did not necessarily mean that such weapons were always stored there; and there is some evidence to suggest that they were not kept at the SBA during the crisis of 1963–64: interviews; and R. Moore, ‘Where Her Majesty’s weapons were’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 57, January/February 2001, 63 (to which Lorna Lloyd kindly drew my attention).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2002 Alan James

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

James, A. (2002). The West’s Interest in a Peaceful Cyprus. In: Keeping the Peace in the Cyprus Crisis of 1963–64. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403900890_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics