Cathedrals Making Friends: Building Associations

  • Judith A. Muskett


A survey of the official websites of Anglican cathedrals in England has revealed that all of them have formal associations of Friends in the same way as other institutions in the heritage sector (such as libraries and museums). Drawing on questions that emerged from a literature review, in particular from Heritage and Renewal (the Report of the Archbishops’ Commission on Cathedrals in 1994) and a recent chronicle charting the formation of the earliest cathedral Friends’ societies, this chapter analyzes the associations’ present characteristics, as revealed by their own publications. Then it assesses the significance of the Friends’ associations for cathedrals today, especially in terms of their capacity to generate money, prayer, and volunteers for cathedrals; opportunities for social networking; and learning opportunities for members. It is argued that this mode of Friendship is sustained by information, which enables passive participants to share (albeit vicariously) the esoteric benefits and commitment to the cause of the community to which they belong.


Social Capital Voluntary Sector Christian Faith Annual Subscription Musical Tradition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. London, United Kingdom: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Archbishops’ Commission on Cathedrals. (1994). Heritage and renewal. London, United Kingdom: Church House.Google Scholar
  3. Archbishops’ Council Cathedral and Church Buildings Division. (2009). Cathedrals Fabric Commission for England: Annual review 2008. London, United Kingdom: Church House.Google Scholar
  4. Archbishops’ Council Cathedral and Church Buildings Division. (2010). Cathedrals Fabric Commission for England: Annual review 2009. London, United Kingdom: Church House.Google Scholar
  5. Archbishops’ Council, Research and Statistics, Central Secretariat (2014). Cathedral Statistics 2013. Retrieved from Scholar
  6. Beeson, T. (2004). The Deans. London, United Kingdom: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blackadder, L. (2005). Influential friends. Journal of Arts Marketing, 9, 6–7.Google Scholar
  8. Burns Sadek Research Ltd. (1992). Qualitative research conducted to examine the motivations for membership of Friends’ schemes. London, United Kingdom: Arts Council of England.Google Scholar
  9. Chapman, R. (2009). Faith and the voluntary sector in urban governance: Distinctive yet similar? In A. Dinham, R. Furbey, & V. Lowndes (Eds.), Faith in the public realm: Controversies, policies and practices (pp. 203–222). Bristol, United Kingdom: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  10. Churchill, J. H., & Webster, A. (1991). From close to open: A future for the past. In D. Marcombe & C. Knighton (Eds.), Close encounters: English cathedrals and society since 1540, Studies in Local and Regional History No 3 (pp. 161–184). Nottingham, United Kingdom: University of Nottingham, Department of Adult Education.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, J. A. (2003). Religious social capital: Its nature, social location, and limits. In C. Smidt (Ed.), Religion as social capital: Producing the common good (pp. 33–47). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Davie, G. (2003). Seeing salvation: The use of text as data in the sociology of religion. In P. Avis (Ed.), Public faith? The state of religious belief and practice in Britain (pp. 28–44). London, United Kingdom: SPCK.Google Scholar
  13. English Tourist Board. (1979). English cathedrals and tourism. London, United Kingdom: English Tourist Board.Google Scholar
  14. Hayes, D., & Slater, A. (2003). From ‘social club’ to ‘integrated membership scheme’: Developing membership schemes strategically. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heaton, D. (1992). Museums among friends: The wider museum community. London, United Kingdom: Museums and Galleries Commission.Google Scholar
  16. Hilton, M., McKay, J., Crowson, N., & Mouhot, J.-F. (2010). Civic participation and social responsibility. Briefing paper presented to the Strategy Unit of the Cabinet Office, 15 June. Birmingham, United Kingdom: University of Birmingham. Retrieved from Participation.pdfGoogle Scholar
  17. Innes, J. (1996). The ‘mixed economy of welfare’ in early modern England: Assessments of the options from Hale to Malthus (c. 1683–1803). In M. Daunton (Ed.), Charity, self-interest and welfare in the English past (pp. 139–180). London, United Kingdom: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jordan, G., & Maloney, W. A. (1997). The protest business: Mobilizing campaign groups. Manchester, United Kingdom: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lewis, R. (1996). Cathedrals and tourism. In I. MacKenzie (Ed.), Cathedrals now: Their use and place in society (pp. 25–41). Norwich, United Kingdom: Canterbury Press.Google Scholar
  20. Maloney, W. A. (1999). Contracting out the participation function: Social capital and chequebook participation. In J. van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Newton, & P. F. Whiteley (Eds.), Social capital and European democracy (pp. 108–119). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Membership Management Forum. (2010). About the Membership Management Forum. Retrieved from
  22. Muskett, J. A. (2011). Deferential or dazzled? Rural cathedral Friends’ associations and their royal patronage, past and present. Rural Theology 9, 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muskett, J. A. (2012a). From sixpenny entry to five shilling subscription: Charting cathedral outreach and Friends’ associations in the 1920s and 1930s. Journal of Anglican Studies, 10, 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muskett, J. A. (2012b). From vicarious religion to vicarious social capital? Information and passive participation in voluntary associations. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 23, 29–52.Google Scholar
  25. Muskett, J. A. (2013). “Friends” of Anglican cathedrals: Norms and values. Befriending, friending or misnomer? Journal of Beliefs and Values, 34, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Platten, S., & Lewis, C. (1998). Setting a course. Cathedrals and the future. In S. Platten & C. Lewis (Eds.), Flagships of the Spirit: Cathedrals in society (pp. 171–180). London, United Kingdom: Darton, Longman and Todd.Google Scholar
  27. Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. London, United Kingdom: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raymond, C. (1992). Members matter: Making the most of your membership scheme. London, United Kingdom: Arts Council of Great Britain.Google Scholar
  30. Saxbee, J. (2003). Message from the President, the Right Reverend the Bishop of Lincoln, Annual Report of the Friends of Lincoln Cathedral, 2003. Lincoln, United Kingdom: The Friends of Lincoln Cathedral.Google Scholar
  31. Shearlock, D. (1996). Cathedrals and the musical tradition. In I. MacKenzie (Ed.), Cathedrals now. Their use and place in society (pp. 9–23). Norwich, United Kingdom: Canterbury Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sider, R. J., & Unruh, H. R. (2004). Typology of religious characteristics of social service and educational organisations and programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Slater, A. (2003a). An audit of Friends’ schemes at UK heritage sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 9, 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Slater, A. (2003b). Users or supporters? Understanding motivations and behaviors of museum members. Curator, 46, 182–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Slater, A. (2004). Revisiting membership scheme typologies in museums and galleries. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 9, 238–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Slater, A. (2005a). Developing a typology of membership schemes in the UK. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 2, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Slater, A. (2005b). Strategies for success. Journal of Arts Management, 19, 16–17.Google Scholar
  38. Slater, A., & Armstrong, K. (2010). Involvement, Tate, and me. Journal of Marketing Management, 26, 727–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Weber, R. P. (2004). Content analysis. In C. Searle (Ed.), Social research methods. A reader (pp. 117–124). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Whiteley, P. F. (2011). Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world. Party Politics, 17, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wollebaek, D., & Selle, P. (2002). Does participation in voluntary associations contribute to social capital? The impact of intensity, scope and type. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 32–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Leslie J. Francis 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith A. Muskett

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations