Skip to main content

Mobility and Inequality in Indian Agriculture

  • Chapter
Development Economics
  • 941 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study changes in income and wealth distribution in Indian agriculture using Farm Management Studies data from the Ferozepur district of Punjab. The paper uses a short time series of a ‘cohort’ of farms (not farmers) for 1967/68, 1968/69 and 1969/70. This is an especially interesting period since the Green Revolution was just beginning to gain importance in northern India. There has been much discussion about how the gains of the Green Revolution have been unfairly distributed (Byres (1972), Griffin (1974), Hanumantha Rao (1975), Junankar (1975), Das Gupta (1977)) due to the easier access large farmers have to credit and hence to high yielding varieties of-seeds, fertilisers and irrigation. In this paper I shall use regression analysis to study changes in inequality over time. The proposed method of analysis allows us to test whether inequality is increasing or decreasing on average, or whether it is changing due to mobility in the sample. We can also test the commonly made assumption of ‘time homogeneity’ (i e, transition probabilities remain constant over time) see Shorrocks (1976). Finally, we can test whether an individual farm that does well in one period does even better in the next period or, in Hart’s (1976) words, does ‘success breed success’. Our method employs Zellner’s seemingly unrelated regressions estimation technique to estimate a set of equations subject to restrictions.

This paper attempts to study changes in income and wealth distribution in Indian agriculture, using Farm Management Studies data for the Ferozepur district of Punjab. The proposed method of analysis allows the author to test whether inequality is increasing or decreasing on average or whether it is changing due to mobility in the sample. Also tested are the commonly made assumption of ‘time homogeneity’, i e, transition probabilities remain constant over time, and whether an individual farm that does well in one period does even better in the next period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Byres, T J, ‘The Dialectic of India’s Green Revolution’, South Asian Review, Vol 5, No 2, January 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champernowne, D G, ‘A Comparison of Measures of Inequality of Income Distribution’, Economic Journal, Vol 84, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, ‘A Model of Income Distribution’, Economic Journal, Vol 63, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, W R, ‘Policy Instruments for Rural Income Distribution’ in Frank and Webb, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creedy, J and Hart, P E, ‘Age and the Distribution of Earnings’, Economic Journal, Vol 89, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, B. ‘Agrarian Change and the New Technology’, (UNRISD, Geneva 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, C R and Webb, R C, ‘Income Distribution and Growth in Less Developed Countries’, (Brookings Institution, Washington, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, K, ‘The Political Economy of Agrarian Change’, (Macmillan, London 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P E, ‘The Dynamics of Earnings, 1963–73’, Economic Journal, Vol 86, September 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, ‘The Statics and Dynamics of Income Distributions: A Survey’ (University of Reading Disc. Paper, Econ Series A No 114, December 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Junankar, P N, ‘The Green Revolution and Inequality’ Economic and Political Weekly, Vol X, No 13, Review of Agriculture, March 29, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N C, ‘Applications of Lorenz Curves in Economic Analysis’, Econometrica, Vol 45, No 3, April 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minhas, B S, ‘Rural Poverty, Land Redistribution and Development’, Indian Economic Review, Vol 5, No 1, April 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C H H, ‘Technological Change and Distribution of Gains in Indian Agriculture’ (Macmillan, Delhi, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudra, A, ‘Organisation of Agriculture for Rural Development: the Indian Case’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol 2, No 4, December 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A, On Economic Inequality, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, A F, ‘Income Mobility and the Markov Assumption’, Economic Journal, Vol 86, September 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szal, R and Robinson, S, ‘Measuring Income Inequality’ in Frank and Webb, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 Economic and Political Weekly

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Junankar, P.N. (1986). Mobility and Inequality in Indian Agriculture. In: Development Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137555229_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics