Skip to main content

Unequal Equals: How Politics Can Block Empathy

  • Chapter

Abstract

The Israeli NGO Zochrot recently hosted a public hearing modelled on the South African ‘Truth and Reconciliation Commissions’. The hearing focused on events that took place from 1948 to 1960 in the South of Israel. Elderly Palestinians gave testimonies about how their villages and locations were destroyed and how they and their relatives were expelled from their land after the establishment of the State of Israel. Jewish Israelis who had fought in the Zionist Armed forces and later in the Israeli army bore witness to the orders they received and the deeds they had done. The event was titled ‘Truth Commission’; the term ‘reconciliation’ was deliberately avoided. “We cannot talk about reconciliation when the Nakba is ongoing. We are still in a situation where there is apartheid, constant violations of human rights and 70 percent of the Palestinian community are refugees”, Liat Rosenberg, director of Zochrot, pointed out.1 The Truth Commission indicates a change of paradigm taking place since 2000 in the Israeli-Palestinian peace movement. The peace agenda used to focus on reconciliation, dialogue and on the acknowledgment of two different narratives -Arab-Palestinian and Jewish-Israeli. Today it focuses on solidarity with the oppressed, on justice, and on truth. Zochrot is but one example of this change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For an extensive analysis of the Beit Sahour dialogue, see S. Berlowitz (2012) Die Erfahrung der Anderen. Konfliktstoff im palästinensisch-israelischen Dialog (Konstanz: Konstanz University Press) and

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y.-J. Zupnik (2000) ‘A Face-Driven Account of Identity Exchanges in Israeli-Palestinian “Dialogue” Events’ in Mary Jane Collier (ed.) Constituting Cultural Difference Through Discourse (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications), pp. 271–294.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Hall (1991) ‘Ethnicity: Identity and Difference’, Radical America, 23, 4, pp. 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Breithaupt (2012) ‘A Three-Person Model of Empathy’, in: Emotion Review, Vol. 4, No, 1 (January 2012), pp. 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Breithaupt (2009) Kulturen der Empathie (Suhrkamp: Frankfurt a.M.), pp. 157ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Zerubavel (1995) Recovered Roots. Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition (Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Shelley Berlowitz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berlowitz, S. (2016). Unequal Equals: How Politics Can Block Empathy. In: Assmann, A., Detmers, I. (eds) Empathy and its Limits. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552372_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics