Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Religion after Secularization in Australia pp 91–117Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

The Place of Religion in Australian Sociolegal Interaction

  • Chapter

Abstract

Iwas in Honolulu with my family on June 28, 2013. As we strolled along Kalakaua Avenue that evening, I noticed a person carrying a sign announcing simply that “Jesus Saves Your Lives,” who had found herself inches from another person wearing sandwich board signs inviting people to fire real semiautomatic rifles and handguns at a local firing range. For me, the juxtaposition could not have been starker. The two issues that seem most to typify the United States to the rest of the world, and that also seem to fascinate the rest of us—religion and guns—squared off, as represented by two adherents to those positions. And of course, this raised the question of how law deals with religion in a liberal democracy. On that day in Honolulu, and across the United States, it was no academic question; you may have noted the date on which this occurred: June 28, 2013.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Attorney-General’s Department (Cth). 2011. “Consolidation of Commonwealth AntiDiscrimination Laws Discussion Paper.” Last modified September 2011. http://www.ag.gov.au/Consultations/Documents/ConsolidationofCommonwealthanti-discriminationlaws/Consolidation%20of%20Commonwealth%20Anti-Discrimination %20Laws.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attorney-General for Australia. 2013. “New Protections for Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Intersex People Pass the House.” May. http://www.attorneygeneral.gov.au/Mediareleases/Pages/2013/Second%20quarter/30-May-2013-New-protections-for-sexual-orientation,-gender-identity-and-intersex-people-pass-the-House.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2012. “Reflecting a Nation: Stories from the 2011 Census, 2012–2013: Cultural Diversity in Australia.” Last modified June 21, 2012. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/2071.0Main%20Features902012 %E2%80%932013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babie, Paul. 2011. “Synthesis or Separation? Church, State and Marriage in Byzantine Law.” Journal of Law and Religion 26: 585–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2013. “Comparative Perspectives: Australia.” In The Protections for Religious Rights: Law and Practice, edited by Sir James Dingemans, Tom Cross, Hafsah Masood, and Can Yeginsu, 4.01–4.60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babie, Paul, and Laira Krieg. 2013. “The Space for Religion in Australian Society: An Assessment of the Impact of Australian Anti-D iscrimination Legislation on Religious Freedom.” In Child Sexual Abuse, Society and the Future of the Church, edited by Hilary Regan, 83–115. Adelaide: ATF Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babie, Paul, and James Krumrey-Quinn. 2013. “Religious Symbols and Autonomy in Australia.” In Reasoning Rights: Comparative Judicial Engagement, edited by Liora Lazarus, Christopher McCrudden, and Nigel Bowles, 259–78. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babie, Paul, and Neville Rochow, editors. 2012. Freedom of Religion under Bills of Rights. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bane, Mary Jo, and Lawrence M. Mead, editors. 2003. Lifting Up the Poor: A Dialogue on Religion, Poverty and Welfare Reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Renae. 2012a. “The Full Face Covering Debate: An Australian Perspective.” University of Western Australia Law Review 36(1): 143–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2012b. “Full Face Covering Legislation.” Alternative Law Journal 37(1): 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckford, Robert. 2003. Social Theory and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blackshield, Tony, and George Williams. 2009. Australian Constitutional Law and Theory: Commentary and Materials. Sydney: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, Gary. 2006. Australian Soul: Religion and Spirituality in the Twenty-First Century. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, Gary, Desmond Cahill, Hass Dellal, and Athalia Zwartz. 2011. Freedom of Religion and Belief in 21st Century Australia. Sydney: Australian Human Rights Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breheny, Simon. 2012. “Democracy Sidelined in Panic over Chaplains.” Sydney Morning Herald, July 5. http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/democracy-sidelined-in-panic-over-chaplains-20120704–21his.html.

  • Byrnes, Andrew, Hilary Charlesworth, and Gabrielle McKinnon. 2009. Bills of Rights in Australia: History, Politics and Law. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, Desmond, Gary Bouma, Hass Dellal, and Michael Leahy. 2004. Religion, Cultural Diversity and Safeguarding Australia: A Partnership under the Australia Government’s Living in Harmony Initiative. Canberra: Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs and Australian Multicultural Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane, Peter, and Herbert M. Kritzer, editors. 2011. Introduction to The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, David. 2012. “Review of Police Powers Requiring Removal of Face Coverings.” Alternative Law Journal 27(3): 206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian Schools Australia (CSA). 2011. “About CSA.” http://csa.edu.au/csa/about.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, Gregory. 1986. Official Record of the Debates of the Australasian Federal Convention, Adelaide, Sydney, Melbourne, 1897–1898. Sydney: Legal Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. 2012. “National School Chaplaincy and Student Welfare Program Overview.” http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/NSCSWP/Pages/NSCSWP_Overview.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist. 2010a. “Sharia in the West: Whose Law Counts Most?” October 16. http://www.economist.com/node/17249634.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2010b. “Islamic Law and Democracy: Sense about Sharia.” October 16. http://www.economist.com/node/17251830.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2010c. “Tennessee: An Uncivil Action.” November 20. http://www.economist.com/node/17528070.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2013. “Reading Dawkins in a Cabin.” June 1. http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21578664-atheists-complain-about-free-bibles-wilderness-reading-dawkins-cabin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, Richard. 1976. Unto God and Caesar: Religious Issues in the Emerging Commonwealth, 1891–1906. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Neil. 2011. “Freedom of Religion in Practice: Exemptions under AntiDiscrimination Laws on the Basis of Religion.” Paper presented at Law and Religion: Legal Regulation of Religious Groups, Organizations and Communities, University of Melbourne, July 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galligan, Dennis J. 2011. “Legal Theory and Empirical Research.” In The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, edited by Peter Cane and Herbert M. Kritzer, 976–1001. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedicks, Frederick. 1995. The Rhetoric of Church and State: A Critical Analysis of Religion Clause Jurisprudence. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, Mary Ann. 2010. Introduction to Universal Rights in a World of Diversity: The Case of Religious Freedom, by the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. Vatican City: Pontificia Academia Scientiarum Socialium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, Roger S. 2006. A Greener Faith: Religious Environmentalism and Our Planet’s Future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Anthony. 2011. “Section 116 of the Australian Constitution and Dress Restrictions.” Deakin Law Review 16(2): 293–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, Carol J. 1986. Praying for Justice: Faith, Order, and Community in an American Town. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, Michael, and Gregory C. Sisk. 2012. “Ideology ‘All The Way Down?’ An Empirical Study of Establishment Clause Decisions in the Federal Courts.” Michigan Law Review 110: 1201–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, Anne, and Cornelia Koch. 2011. “Can and Should Burqas Be Banned? The Legality and Desirability of Bans of the Full Veil in Europe and Australia.” Alternative Law Journal 36(1): 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Branch, Attorney-General’s Department (Cth). 2010. “Australian Human Rights Framework.” Last modified April 2010. http://www.ag.gov.au/Consultations/Documents/Publicsubmissionsonthedraftbaselinestudy/AustraliasHumanRights Framework.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irving, Helen. 1999. To Constitute a Nation: A Cultural History of Australia’s Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Cornelia, Anne Hewitt, and Melati Lum. 2010. “Do Burqas Bite? National and International Perspectives on Bans of Religious Dress.” Paper presented at the South Australian Chapter of the Australian Association of Constitutional Law and the Research Unit for the Study of Society, Law and Religion at the University of Adelaide: Joint Seminar, Adelaide Law School, July 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritzer, Herbert M. 2011. “The (Nearly) Forgotten Early Empirical Legal Research.” In The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, edited by Peter Cane and Herbert M. Kritzer, 875–900. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Nauze, J. A. 1972. The Making of the Australian Constitution. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Jane. 2012. “Father to Take on Canberra Again over Chaplains.” The Age, July 7. http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/father-to-take-canberra-on-again -over-chaplains-20120706–21mop.html.

  • Maclean, Mavis. 2011. “Families.” In The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, edited by Peter Cane and Herbert M. Kritzer, 285–307. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclean, Mavis, and John Eekelaar. 2004. “The Obligations and Expectations of Couples within Families: Three Modes of Interaction.” Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 26: 117–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, Jon. 2006. American Gospel: God, the Founding Fathers, and the Making of a Nation. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezrani, Leanne. 2012. “Academic Says Chaplaincy Rescue Bill Flawed.” Lawyers Weekly, June 28. http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/academic-says-chaplaincy-rescue-bill-is-flawed.

  • Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. 2009. God Is Back: How the Global Rise of Faith Is Changing the World. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naffine, Ngaire. 2008. “Law’s Sacred and Secular Subjects.” In Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context, edited by Peter Cane, Carolyn Evans, and Zoë Robinson, 268–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2009a. “How Religion Constrains Law and the Idea of Choice.” Adelaide Law Review 30: 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2009b. Law’s Meaning of Life: Philosophy, Religion, Darwin and the Legal Person. Portland: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2011. “The Need for Multi-Method Approaches in Empirical Legal Research.” In The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, edited by Peter Cane and Herbert M. Kritzer, 951–75. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannam, Clifford. 1963. “Travelling Section 116 with a U.S. Road Map.” Melbourne University Law Review 4: 41–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. 2004. Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church. Strathfield: St Pauls Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quick, John, and Robert Randolph Garran. 1901. The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth. Sydney: Australian Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, Darby Kathleen, editor. 2006. Theology that Matters: Ecology, Economy, and God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, Sophie. 2010. “The Niqab in the Courtroom.” Law Society Journal 48(9): 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Bernadette, and Vic Pfitzner, editors. 2010. Issues at the Borders of Life. Adelaide: ATF Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, Amanda. 2012. “Using Representative Government to Bypass Representative Government.” Public Law Review 23: 161–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Benjamin B. 2012. “The Commonwealth and the Chaplains: Executive Power after Williams v Commonwealth.” Public Law Review 23: 153–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, Parliament of Australia. 2013. “Inquiry into the Exposure Draft of the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill 2012.” Last modified February 21, 2013. http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed_inquiries/2010–13/antidiscrimination2012/report/index.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, Gregory C., Michael Heise, and Andrew P. Morriss. 2004. “Searching for the Soul of Judicial Decisionmaking: An Empirical Study of Religious Freedom Decisions.” Ohio State Law Journal 65: 491–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Steven D. 2010. The Disenchantment of Secular Discourse. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Mark. 2010. “Court of Appeal Decision Impacts All Christian Schools.” CSA Blogs: Comment, Opinion and Features, August 17. http://csa.edu.au/blogs/staff/378-court-of-appeal-decision-impacts-all-christian-schools.

  • Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Parliament of Australia. 2009. “Inquiry into the Effectiveness of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 in Eliminating Discrimination and Promoting Gender Equality.” Last modified December 2009. http://www.aph.gov.au/binaries/senate/committee/legcon_ctte/sex_discrim/report/report.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, Mark C., and Elizabeth Mertz. 2010. “A New Legal Empiricism? Assessing ELS and NLR.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6: 555–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydney Morning Herald. 2010. “Gay Foster Care Ban Divides Uniting Church.” December 17. http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/gay-foster-care-ban-divides-uniting-church-20101227–19881.html.

  • Thornhill, John. 1992. Making Australia: Exploring Our National Conversation. Newtown: Millennium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnour, Elizabeth. 2010. “Religious Body Exemptions under Anti-Discrimination Legislation.” Moore’s Legal, August. http://www.mooreslegal.com.au/uploadedFiles/Newsletters/NotForProfit/nl/NFP_Briefing_August_2010.pdf.

  • Twining, William. 2009. General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Twomey, Anne. 2012. “Bringing Down the House? Keeping School Chaplains Means a Surrender to the Executive.” Conversation, June 27. http://theconversation.edu.au/bringing-down-the-house-keeping-school-chaplains-means-a-surrender-to-the-executive-7926.

  • Williams, Rowan. 2008. “Civil and Religious Law in England: A Religious Perspective.” Paper presented at the Foundation Lecture in the Temple Festival Series at the Royal Courts of Justice, London, February 7. Accessed July 22, 2013. http://rowanwilliams.archbishopofcanterbury.org/articles.php/1137/archbishops-lecture-civil-and-religious-law-in-england-a-religious-perspective.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Augusto, and Lael Daniel Weinberger. 2012. “Secularization by Law? The Establishment Clauses and Religion in the Public Square in Australia and the United States.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 10: 208–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Paul Babie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia

    Timothy Stanley (Senior Lecturer) (Senior Lecturer)

Copyright information

© 2015 Timothy Stanley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Babie, P. (2015). The Place of Religion in Australian Sociolegal Interaction. In: Stanley, T. (eds) Religion after Secularization in Australia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137551382_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation