Abstract
Developing a grounded theory of higher education for sustainability. The chapter starts with a commentary on some of the internal contradictions in the domains of sustainability education with respect to student independence and academic freedom. The chapter discusses the implications of each of the themes, or conceptual hypotheses, that have arisen in this research and in particular focuses on how these themes, or hypotheses, cannot be fully rationalised on their own but need to be seen as an integrated whole (similar in some ways to the idea of parts of the jigsaw puzzle fitting together to create a picture that individual parts cannot reveal). The chapter ends by anticipating and discussing some of the criticisms that this grounded theory will attract.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Association of University Leaders for a Sustainable Future (2015) Talloires Declaration. Retrieved 20 July 2015 from http://www.ulsf.org/talloires_declaration.html
Barnett, R. (1997) Higher Education: A Critical Business. Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press.
Bowers, C.A. (2010) Essays on Ecologically Sustainable Educational Reforms. Retrieved 15 January 2010 from http://cabowers.net/pdl/Book-Essays-Eco.pdf.
Cotton, D., Bailey, I., Warren, M., & Bissell, S. (2009). Revolutions and second-best solutions: education for sustainable development in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 34(7), 719–733.
Dawe, G., Jucker, R., & Martin S. (2005). Sustainable development in higher education: Current practice and future developments. A report for the Higher Education Academy. York, Higher Education Academy.
De Bono, E. (1999) Six Thinking Hats 2nd edition. New York: Back Bay Books.
Fish, S. (2008). Save the World on Your Own Time. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Glaser, B.G. (1998) Doing Grounded Theory — Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Harraway, J., Broughton-Ansin, F., Deaker, L., Jowett, T., & Shephard, K. (2012) Exploring the use of the Revised New Ecological Paradigm Scale (NEP) to monitor the development of students’ ecological worldviews. Journal of Environmental Education 43 (3), 177–191.
Hollweg, K., Taylor, J., Bybee, R., Marcinkowski, T., McBeth, W., & Zoido, P. (2011). Developing a Framework for Assessing Environmental Literacy. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education. Retrieved 6 August 2013 from http://www.naaee.net/framework.
Jensen, B.B., & Schnack, K. (2006). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research 12 (3), 471–486.
Krathwohl, D., Bloom, B., & Masia, B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Hand-Book II: The Affective Domain. New York: David McKay.
Kronlid, D., & Österbergh, R. (2011) Crossing boundaries: an analytical look at CEMUS educational model. In: Hald, M. (Ed.) Transcending Boundaries. Uppsala, Sweden: Centrum for miljöoch utvecklingsstudier (CEMUS) & SLU.
Lai, E. (2011) Critical Thinking: A Literature Review. Pearson Research Report. Retrieved 8 August 2013 from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/pai/ai/research/resources/Research_Reports.
Mann, S.J. (2008). Study, Power and the University. Maidenhead: SRHE and OUP.
Margolis, E., & Romero, M. (1998). The department is very male, very white, very old and very conservative: the functioning of the hidden curriculum in graduate sociology departments. Harvard Educational Review 68, 1–32.
Mason O’Connor, K., Lynch, K., & Owen, D. (2011) Student-community engagement and the development of graduate attributes. Education and Training 53 (2/3), 100–115.
McHoul, A., & Grace, W. (1993). A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power, and the Subject. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Mezirow, J. (2000) Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Newman, J.H. (1907) The Idea of a University: Defined and Illustrated. London: Longmans, Green.
Ralph, M., & Stubbs, W. (2013) Integrating environmental sustainability into universities. Higher Education. DOI:10.1007/s10734–013–9641–9.
Schwieler, E., & Ekecrantz, S. (2011) Normative values in teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning in higher education: a belief system approach. International Journal for Academic Development 16 (1), 59–70.
Shephard, K. (2008). Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9 (1), 87–98. http://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810842201
Shephard, K. (2010) Higher education’s role in ‘education for sustainability’. Australian Universities’ Review 52 (1), 13–22.
Shephard, K., & Furnari, M. (2013) Exploring what university teachers think about education for sustainability. Studies in Higher Education 38 (10), 1577–1590.
Shephard, K., Harraway, J., Lovelock, B., Skeaff, S., Slooten, E., Strack, M., Furnari, M., & Jowett, T. (2013) Is the environmental literacy of university students measurable? Environmental Education Research. (In press), but available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504622.2013.816268.
Thomas, I. (2010) Critical thinking, transformative learning, sustainable education, and problem-based learning in universities. Journal of Transformative Education 7 (3), 245–264.
Winter, J., & Cotton, D. (2012) Making the hidden curriculum visible: sustainability literacy in higher education. Environmental Education Research 18 (6), 783–796.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Kerry Shephard
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shephard, K. (2015). A Grounded Theory about ES/ESD in Higher Education. In: Higher Education for Sustainable Development. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137548412_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137548412_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56263-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54841-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)