Skip to main content

A Grounded Theory about ES/ESD in Higher Education

  • Chapter
Higher Education for Sustainable Development
  • 307 Accesses

Abstract

Developing a grounded theory of higher education for sustainability. The chapter starts with a commentary on some of the internal contradictions in the domains of sustainability education with respect to student independence and academic freedom. The chapter discusses the implications of each of the themes, or conceptual hypotheses, that have arisen in this research and in particular focuses on how these themes, or hypotheses, cannot be fully rationalised on their own but need to be seen as an integrated whole (similar in some ways to the idea of parts of the jigsaw puzzle fitting together to create a picture that individual parts cannot reveal). The chapter ends by anticipating and discussing some of the criticisms that this grounded theory will attract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Association of University Leaders for a Sustainable Future (2015) Talloires Declaration. Retrieved 20 July 2015 from http://www.ulsf.org/talloires_declaration.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1997) Higher Education: A Critical Business. Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C.A. (2010) Essays on Ecologically Sustainable Educational Reforms. Retrieved 15 January 2010 from http://cabowers.net/pdl/Book-Essays-Eco.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, D., Bailey, I., Warren, M., & Bissell, S. (2009). Revolutions and second-best solutions: education for sustainable development in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 34(7), 719–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawe, G., Jucker, R., & Martin S. (2005). Sustainable development in higher education: Current practice and future developments. A report for the Higher Education Academy. York, Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1999) Six Thinking Hats 2nd edition. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (2008). Save the World on Your Own Time. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G. (1998) Doing Grounded Theory — Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harraway, J., Broughton-Ansin, F., Deaker, L., Jowett, T., & Shephard, K. (2012) Exploring the use of the Revised New Ecological Paradigm Scale (NEP) to monitor the development of students’ ecological worldviews. Journal of Environmental Education 43 (3), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollweg, K., Taylor, J., Bybee, R., Marcinkowski, T., McBeth, W., & Zoido, P. (2011). Developing a Framework for Assessing Environmental Literacy. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education. Retrieved 6 August 2013 from http://www.naaee.net/framework.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, B.B., & Schnack, K. (2006). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research 12 (3), 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D., Bloom, B., & Masia, B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Hand-Book II: The Affective Domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronlid, D., & Österbergh, R. (2011) Crossing boundaries: an analytical look at CEMUS educational model. In: Hald, M. (Ed.) Transcending Boundaries. Uppsala, Sweden: Centrum for miljöoch utvecklingsstudier (CEMUS) & SLU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, E. (2011) Critical Thinking: A Literature Review. Pearson Research Report. Retrieved 8 August 2013 from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/pai/ai/research/resources/Research_Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S.J. (2008). Study, Power and the University. Maidenhead: SRHE and OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, E., & Romero, M. (1998). The department is very male, very white, very old and very conservative: the functioning of the hidden curriculum in graduate sociology departments. Harvard Educational Review 68, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason O’Connor, K., Lynch, K., & Owen, D. (2011) Student-community engagement and the development of graduate attributes. Education and Training 53 (2/3), 100–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHoul, A., & Grace, W. (1993). A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power, and the Subject. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (2000) Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J.H. (1907) The Idea of a University: Defined and Illustrated. London: Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, M., & Stubbs, W. (2013) Integrating environmental sustainability into universities. Higher Education. DOI:10.1007/s10734–013–9641–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwieler, E., & Ekecrantz, S. (2011) Normative values in teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning in higher education: a belief system approach. International Journal for Academic Development 16 (1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, K. (2008). Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9 (1), 87–98. http://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810842201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, K. (2010) Higher education’s role in ‘education for sustainability’. Australian Universities’ Review 52 (1), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, K., & Furnari, M. (2013) Exploring what university teachers think about education for sustainability. Studies in Higher Education 38 (10), 1577–1590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, K., Harraway, J., Lovelock, B., Skeaff, S., Slooten, E., Strack, M., Furnari, M., & Jowett, T. (2013) Is the environmental literacy of university students measurable? Environmental Education Research. (In press), but available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504622.2013.816268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, I. (2010) Critical thinking, transformative learning, sustainable education, and problem-based learning in universities. Journal of Transformative Education 7 (3), 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J., & Cotton, D. (2012) Making the hidden curriculum visible: sustainability literacy in higher education. Environmental Education Research 18 (6), 783–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Kerry Shephard

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shephard, K. (2015). A Grounded Theory about ES/ESD in Higher Education. In: Higher Education for Sustainable Development. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137548412_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics