Skip to main content

“A Truly Angelic Society”: Eugenic Humanity without Humans

  • Chapter
Breeding and Eugenics in the American Literary Imagination

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine ((PLSM))

  • 143 Accesses

Abstract

In a letter to the secretary of the American Eugenics Society dated September 22, 1927, the distinguished economist Edward A. Ross argued that “interest in eugenics is almost a perfect index of one’s breadth of outlook and unselfish concern for the future of our race. There is no doubt that a truly angelic society could be built up on earth with a people as gifted and well-dispositioned as the best five per cent among us. Of such is the Kingdom of Heaven.”1 Edward A Ross was neither solitary nor extravagant in his unconditional endorsement of eugenics in the 1920s and in the praise he accorded to the new science of human betterment. His comment was rather typical of the time and captures the enthusiasm of numerous American intellectuals who fell under the sway of eugenics prior to World War II. From the end of the nineteenth century through the first four decades of the twentieth century, eugenics managed to attract outstanding men of American science, politics and culture. The list of followers of eugenics is long and includes top academics engaged in cutting-edge research: biologists, zoologists, economists, physicians and sociologists. Eugenics also sparked the imagination of influential politicians, such as President Theodore Roosevelt, Congressman Albert Johnson, Senator David Reed and governor of Pennsylvania Gifford Pinchot as well as prominent lawyers such as Madison Grant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E. A. Ross (1936) Seventy Years of It: An Autobiography (New York: Appleton-Century), 233.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. A. Hasian, Jr. (1996) The Rhetoric of Eugenics in Anglo-American Thought (Athens: The University of Georgia Press), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See for example D. J. Kevles (1995) In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. K. Pickens (1968), Eugenics and the Progressives (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Black (2003), War against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race (New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press);

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Currell and C. Codgell (ed.) (2006), Popular Eugenics: National Efficiency and American Mass Culture in the 1930s (Athens: Ohio University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. S. Pernick (1996), The Black Stork: Eugenics and the Death of “Defective” Babies in American Medicine and Motion Pictures since 1915 (Oxford: Oxford University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. M. Stern (2005), Eugenic Nation: Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding in Modern America (Berkeley: University of California Press);

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Bruins (2006), Better for All the World: The Secret History of Forced Sterilization and America’s Quest for Racial Purity (New York: Alfred A. Knopf);

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. A. Lombardo (ed.) (2011), From the Indiana Experiment to the Human Genome Era (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Galton cited in M. F. Guyer (1916) Being Well-Born: An Introduction to Eugenics (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company), 293.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Galton, “Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope and Aims,” Paper read before the Sociological Society at a Meeting in the School of Economics and Political Science (London University), on May 16, 1904, in F. Galton (2004), Essays in Eugenics (Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific Honolulu), 35.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Grant (1918) The Passing of the Great Race or the Racial Basis of European History (New York: Scribner’s Sons), xx.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Stoddard (1922) The Revolt against Civilization: The Menace of the Under Man (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons), 30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. E. Wiggam (1923) The New Decalogue of Science (Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company), 36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. B. Davenport (1912), “The Geography of Man in Relation to Eugenics,” in W. E. Castle and J. M. Coulter (eds.), Heredity and Eugenics: A Course of Lectures (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press), 309.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. B. Davenport (1912), “The Inheritance of Physical and Mental Traits of Man and Their Application to Eugenics,” in Castle and Coulter, Heredity and Eugenics, 269.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. B. Davenport (1912) “The Family-History Book” Eugenics Record Office Bulletin, 7 (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Eugenics Record Office).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cited in H. H. Newman (1921) Readings in Evolution, Genetics, and Eugenics (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press), 475.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. L. Dugdale (1877) The Jukes: A Study in Crime, Pauperism, Disease and Heredity (New York: Putnam’s Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. H. Estabrook (1916) The Jukes in 1915 (Washington DC: Carnegie Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. H. Goddard (1913) The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of FeebleMindedness (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. F. Osborn (1926) Evolution and Religion: Polemics of the Fundamentalist Controversy of 1922 to 1926 (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Pearl (1919), “Sterilization of Degenerates and Criminals,” Eugenical Review, XI (April), 1–6. At this point, one should note Pearl’s restraint when sketching his list of undesirables, despite the impression to the contrary. When contrasted with a similar list composed by the British proponent of eugenics Reid Rentoul, Pearl’s list in the preface to his highly influential Race Culture; or, Race Suicide is rather modest. R. Rentoul (1906) Race Culture; or, Race Suicide (A Plea for the Unborn) (Newcastle-upon-Tyne: The Walter Scott Publishing Co.), vi.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Black War against the Weak, 78. On Goddard’s IQ testing, see also L. Zenderland (1998), Measuring Minds: Henry Herbert Goddard and the Origins of American Intelligence Testing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. Huntington and L. B. Whitney (1927), The Builders of America (New York: William Morrow and Company), 3. Huntington and Whitney were using Goddard’s terminology developed in his book The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-Mindedness (1877). Black, War against the Weak, 78.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goddard’s lead article in the Eugenics Record Office Bulletin, “Heredity of Feeble-Mindedness,” for example, gives a lengthy explanation of the research into feeblemindedness in children, totally disregarding explanation of the terminology used. H. H. Goddard (1910), “Heredity of Feeble-Mindedness,” Eugenics Record Office Bulletin, I, 3, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See Black War against the Weak, 80; and A. H. Estabrook (1916), “National Conference of Charities and Corrections,” Eugenical News, 1, 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. G. Conklin (1922) Glossary to Heredity and Environment in the Development of Men (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Haraway (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science (New York: Routledge), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. E. Wiggam (1926) The Fruit of the Family Tree (New York: Blue Ribbon Books), 82.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Grant (1918) The Passing of a Great Race or the Racial Basis of European History (New York: Scribner’s Sons), 87.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The first Fittest Family Contest was held at the Kansas Free Fair in Topeka. See L. Lovett (2007), Conceiving the Future: Pronatalism, Reproduction, and the Family in the United States, 1890–1938 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press); A. M. Stern (2002), “Making Better Babies: Public Health and Race Betterment in Indiana, 1920–1935,” American Journal of Public Health (May), 748;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. F. B. Sherbon (1929), “Popular Education,” Eugenics, II, 2 (February), 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ross (1914) The Old World and the New: The Significance of Past and Present Immigration to the American People (New York: The Century Co)., 286.

    Google Scholar 

  36. E. Huntington (1928), “The Next Revolution,” Eugenics, I, 1 (October), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  37. For a discussion of the shift from Social Darwinism to the new ethics, see R. Weikart (2004), From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  38. P. Popenoe and E. S. Gosney (1929), Sterilization for Human Betterment (New York: Macmillan), 98.

    Google Scholar 

  39. L. F. Whitney (1929), “Is Eugenics Racial Snobbery,” Eugenics, II, 2 (February), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  40. L. F. Whitney (1929) “Immigration from Another Angle,” Eugenics, II, 3 (March), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  41. W. E. Kellicott (1911) The Social Direction of Human Evolution: An Outline of the Science of Eugenics (New York: D. Appleton and Company), 120–130.

    Google Scholar 

  42. H. H. Goddard (1929), “Hereditary Mental Aptitudes in Man,” Eugenics, II, 4 (April), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  43. T. N. Carver (1929), “The Economic Test of Fitness,” Eugenics, II, 7 (July), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  44. For an excellent insight into the connection between eugenics and American organized religion, see C. Rosen (2004), Preaching Eugenics: Religious Leaders and the American Eugenics Movement (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. B. Regal (2002) Henry Fairfield Osborn: Race and the Search for the Origins of Man (Aldershot: Ashgate), 160.

    Google Scholar 

  46. H. F. Osborn (1926) Evolution and Religion: Polemics of the Fundamentalist Controversy of 1922 to 1926 (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  47. P. E. Osgood (1928), “The Refiner’s Fire,” Eugenics, I, 3 (December), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  48. H. Arendt (1998) The Human Condition (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press), 7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. C. G. Campbell (1936) “The German Policy” Eugenical News: Current Record of Race Hygiene, XXI, 2 (March–April), 25. See also “Eugenical Sterilization in Germany,” Eugenical News, XVII, 5 (September–October 1933), 89–90; “Race Culture in Germany,” Eugenical News, XVII, 5 (September–October 1933), 91; C. M. Goethe, “Patriotism and Racial Standards,” Paper delivered at the 24th Annual Meeting of the Eugenics Research Association, American Museum of Natural History, June 6, 1936, Frederick Osborn Papers, The American Philosophical Society. For a historical insight,

    Google Scholar 

  50. see Stefan Kühl (1994), The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism and German National Socialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Ewa Barbara Luczak

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luczak, E.B. (2015). “A Truly Angelic Society”: Eugenic Humanity without Humans. In: Breeding and Eugenics in the American Literary Imagination. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137545794_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics