Skip to main content

Public Decisions in Private Networks: The Implication of Networking Upward, Downward, and Outward Relations for Decision Making in China

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Governing China in the 21st Century ((GC21))

Abstract

Decision making is an important function of governments. The pursuit of effective decision making is as old as the history of governments. Yet, its process and dynamics continue evolving. Some earlier writings suggested that such terms as the “black box,” the “bounded rationality” (Simon 1947), or as Stone (1997) termed, the “paradox,” are often associated with decision making in general and government decisions in particular. A more recent interesting angle, with increasing prevalence, is the role of networks in policy decision making and management (O’Toole 1997: 45–52; Provan and Milward 2001: 414– 423; Romzek, LeRoux, and Blackmar 2012: 442–453; Agranoff and McGuire 2003). Networks are “structures of interdependence involving multiple organizations or parts thereof, where one unit is not merely the formal subordinate of the others in some larger hierarchical arrange” (O’Toole 1997: 45–52, p. 45). In that same article, O’Toole suggested several descriptive tasks that require sustained efforts, and one of the tasks is “exploring the array of networks in a broadly comparative perspective” (1997: 48). In Provan and Lemaire’s recent work (2012: 638–648), this task, however, is still identified as one of the obvious areas where research is very much needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agranoff, Robert. 2006. “Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers.” Public Administration Review 66 Special Issue (S1): 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, Robert and Michael McGuire. 2003. Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baidu. 2013. “Understanding the Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party.” Accessed January 10, 2014. http://news.baidu.com/z/sanzhongquanhui/zhuanti.html.

  • Belefski, Mary. 2006. “Collaboration at the US Environmental Protection Agency: An Interview with Two Senior Managers.” Public Administration Review 66 (Special Issue): 143–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, Barbara C. and John M. Bryson. 2010. “Integrative Leadership and the Creation and Maintenance of Cross-Sector Collaborations.” Leadership Quarterly 21 (2): 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deborah A. Stone. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai. 1967. “Mixed-Scanning: The ‘Third’ Approach to Decision Making.” Public Administration Review 27 (5): 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Daniel M. and Michael S. McPherson. 2006. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, Christopher. 1991. “A Public Management for all Seasons?” Public Administration 69: 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing, Yijia and Bin Chen. 2012. “Is Competitive Contracting really Competitive? Exploring Government-Nonprofit Collaboration in China.” International Public Management Journal 15 (4): 405–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, Robyn, Myrna P. Mandell, and Robert Agranoff, eds. 2013. Network Theory in the Public Sector: Building New Theoretical Frameworks. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Susan V. and Michael F. Martin. 2013. Understanding China’s Political System. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. “The Science of “Muddling through.”. Public Administration Review 19 (2): 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, Michael. 2006. “Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It.” Public Administration Review 66: 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, Kenneth J. and Laurence J. O’Toole. 2003. “Public Management and Educational Performance: The Impact of Managerial Networking.” Public Administration Review 63 (6): 689–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Mark H. 1997. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, Paul C. 2005. “Comparing Public and Private Sector Decision-Making Practices.” Journal ofPublic Administration Research and Theory: J-PART 16: 289–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, Rosemary, Yujin Choi, and Catherine M. Gerard. 2012. “The Skill Set of the Successful Collaborator.” Public Administration Review 72 (s1): S70–S83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr. 1997. “Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 57 (1): 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, Laurence J. and Kenneth J. Meier. 2004. “Desperately Seeking Selznick: Cooptation and the Dark Side of Public Management in Networks.” Public Administration Review 64 (6): 681–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, Laurence J., Kenneth J. Meier, and Yi Lu. 2006. “All that Glitters is Not Gold: Disaggregating Networks and the Impact on Performance.” In Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management, edited by G. A. Boyne, Kenneth J. Meier, Laurence J. O’Toole Jr., and R. M. Walker. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, Keith G. and Robin H. Lemaire. 2012. “Core Concepts and Key Ideas for Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks: Using Research to Inform Scholarship and Practice.” Public Administration Review 72 (5): 638–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, Keith G. and Brinton H. Milward. 2001. “Do Networks really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks.” Public Administration Review 61 (4): 414–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romzek, Barbara S., Kelly LeRoux, and Jeannette M. Blackmar. 2012. “A Preliminary Theory of Informal Accountability among Network Organizational Actors.” Public Administration Review 72 (3): 442–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, James D. 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Richard M., Rhys Andrews, George A. Boyne, Kenneth J. Meier, and Laurence J. O’Toole Jr. 2010. “Wakeup Call: Strategic Management, Network Alarms, and Performance.” Public Administration Review 70 (5): 731–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Shaoguang and Peng Fan. 2013. The Chinese Model of Consensus Decision-Making: A Case Study of Healthcare Reform. Beijing, China: China Renmin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Edward P. and Anne M. Khademian. 2008. “Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings.” Public Administration Review 68 (2): 334–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Yijia Jing

Copyright information

© 2015 Yijia Jing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lu, E.Y. (2015). Public Decisions in Private Networks: The Implication of Networking Upward, Downward, and Outward Relations for Decision Making in China. In: Jing, Y. (eds) The Road to Collaborative Governance in China. Governing China in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137542182_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics