Skip to main content

Abstract

Increasing globalisation and lowering ocean freight help each nation focus on producing commodities of its specialty. With high quality but low paid labour, Asian nations have manufactured delicate industrial products and sold them to the EU and the US. North America has large arable lands that are suitable for planting agriculture (e.g., grains) with large farming machinery. The harvest grains can then be exported to the Asian nations. The major grains trade in the cross Pacific Ocean route could include soya bean, corn and wheat. The rapid increase of dry bulker freight between 2002 and 2008 forced the grain importers and shippers to ship their grain cargo by dry containers. It is estimated the containerisation ratio was around 80% in 2008. The grain containers could be used to control the freight cost for grain importers, and the grain cargoes can be transported on a door-to-door basis. It increases the importers’ competitiveness because of its door-to-door service ability, its low ocean freight and small parcel size, reducing grain silo storage time and avoiding high inventory cost occurred by lengthy in-transit time. In short, the total logistics cost of imported grain cargoes can be reduced by using the container shipping service. Historical data reveal that only around 50% of containers exported from Asia to North America can find backhaul cargoes because many empty containers were trapped in North America in the 1990s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Buckley, J. J. (1985) “Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’este, G. M. (1992) “Carrier selection in a RO/RO ferry trade Part 2: conceptual framework for the decision process”, Maritime policy and Management, 19(2), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, P. T, Harper, D. V. and Needham, P. M. (1996) “The determinants of shipper perceptions of modes”, Transportation Journal, 36(2), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2007) “Most important agricultural imports and exports (in value terms)”, http://www.fao.org/statistics/yearbook/vol_1_1/pdf/c10.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, J. M. and Chiu, Y. J. (2004) Research Methodology, Chiendu Press, Hsinju City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, K. K. and Hervik, A. (2004) “A game theoretic ‘mode-choice’ model for freight transportation”, The Annals of Regional Science, 38(3), 469–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M. (2000) “Diversify Your Wheat Markets: How to Establish Identity Preserved Channels Using Containers”, Wheat Markets in Asia, Washington Wheat Commission, Idaho Wheat Commission, and U.S. Department of Agriculture Conference presentation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meixell, M. J. and Norbis, M. (2008) “A review of the transportation mode choice and carrier selection literature”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(2), 183–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E. L. and Gray, R. (1998) “The transport selection criteria of Norwegian exporters”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 28(2), 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process-Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinghal, N. and Fowkes, T. (2002) “Freight mode choice and adaptive stated preferences”, Transportation Research, Part E, 38(5), 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soon, B. N. (2005) “The Competitive Position of U.S. Corn and Soybean in Asian Markets: A Customer’s Perspective” Presentation at 2005 Commodity Classic, Austin, Texas, 26 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Train, K. and Wilson, W. W. (2007) “Spatially generated transportation demands”, Railroad Economics Research in Transportation Economics, 20, 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaur, S. H., Tzeng, G. H. and Wang, K. C. (1997) “Evaluating tourist risks from fuzzy perspectives,” Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4), 796–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2007) Grain Transportation Report, 27 December 2007, http://www.ams.usda.gov/tmdtsb/grain/2007/12-27-07.pdf (accessed on 31 December 2007).

  • Vachal, K. and Reichert, H. (2001) “U.S. Containerised Grain and Oilseed Exports”, Industry Profile: Phase I. USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannieuwenhuyse, B., Gelders, L. and Pintelon, L. (2003) “An online decision support system for transportation mode choice”, Logistics Information Management, 16(2), 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965) “Fuzzy sets”, Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1972) “A rationale for fuzzy control”, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 94(G), 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (2008) “Is there a need for fuzzy logic?” Information Sciences, 178(13), 2751–2779.231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Ted T. C. Lirn and Jung-De Wang

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lirn, T.T.C., Wang, JD. (2016). The Determinants of Containerised Grain Shipping. In: Pawar, K.S., Rogers, H., Potter, A., Naim, M. (eds) Developments in Logistics and Supply Chain Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137541253_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics