Skip to main content

Price Discovery Process Before and After the Introduction of the “arrowhead” Trading System at the Tokyo Stock Exchange

  • Chapter
Reform and Price Discovery at the Tokyo Stock Exchange: From 1990 to 2012

Abstract

In Chapter 6 we investigate the impact of the introduction of the arrowhead trading system introduced on January 4, 2010 at the Tokyo Stock Exchange (Tokyo Stock Exchange, 2014).

As we study the analyses based on our two hypotheses, we find a twofold pattern in these changes, depending on the market size of stocks. That is, among large-cap stocks, trading costs dramatically decreased, most likely as a result of order slicing by institutional investors and HFTs. But among small-cap stocks, that change was not so large.

When we look at asset pricing using the Fama and MacBeth test, we find that information asymmetry became a significant variable among large-cap stocks, whereas and the liquidity and/or trading cost effects are more pronounced among small-cap stocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkas, N., De Bondt, E., Declerck, F., and Oppens, H. V. (2007), “PIN Anomaly around M&A Announcements”, Journal of Financial Markets, 10, 169–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amihud, Y. (2002), “Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects,” Journal of Financial Markets, 5, 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, J and DeMarzo, P. (2011), Corporate Finance (second edition) New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. (1989), “Noise,” Journal of Finance, 43, 540–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budish, E., Cramton, P., and Shim, J. (2013), “The high-frequency trading arms race: frequent batch auctions as a market design response,” Chicago Booth Paper No. 14–03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, J., Wahal, S., and Xiang, J. (2014), “High frequency quoting, trading, and effciency of prices,” JPX Working paper, Japan Exchange Group. http://www.jpx.co.jp/general-information/ research-study/wp.html (accessed March 25, 2014 ).

  • Duarte, J., Han, X., Harford, J., and Young, L. (2008), “Information asymmetry, information dissemination and the effect of regulation FD on the cost of capital,” Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, J. and Young, L. (2009), “Why is PIN priced?” Journal of Financial Economics, 91, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., Hvidkjaer, S., and O’Hara, M. (2002), “Is information risk a determinant of asset returns?” Journal of Finance, 57, 2185–2222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., Kiefer, N. M., O’Hara, M., and Paperman, J. B. (1996), “Liquidity, information, and infrequently traded stocks,” Journal of Finance, 51, 1405–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D. and O’Hara, M. (2004), “Information and the cost of capital,” Journal of Finance, 59, 1553–1583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, A., Holden, C. W., Jain, P., and Jennings, R. (2003), “Determinants of order choice on the New York Stock Exchange,” Unpublished paper, Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama,E. F. and MacBeth, J. D. (1973), “Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests,” Journal of Political Economy, 81, 607–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosaka, G. (2014), “Analysis of high-frequency trading at Tokyo Stock Exchange,” JPX Working paper, Japan Exchange Group. Available at http://www.jpx.co.jp/general-information/research-study/wp.html (accessed March 25, 2015 ).

  • Kissel, R. (2014), The Science of Algorithmic Trading and Portfolio Management. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, K., Suda, K., and Takehara, H. (2012), “Impact of quarterly disclosure on information asymmetry: evidence from Tokyo Stock Exchange firms,” Paper presented at the 2012 Econometric Society European Meeting, Malaga, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, K. and Takehara, H. (2009), “Information-based trade, the PIN variable, and portfolio style differences: evidence from Tokyo Stock Exchange firms,” Pacifi c-Basin Finance Journal, 17, 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, K. and Takehara, H. (2010), “Expected return, liquidity risk, and contrarian strategy: evidence from Tokyo Stock Exchange firms,” Managerial Finance, 36 (8), 655–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesmond, D. A., Ogden, J. P., and Trzcinka, C. A. (1999), “A new estimate of transaction costs,” Review of Financial Studies, 12, 1113–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odders-White, E. R. and Ready, M. J. (2003), “Credit ratings and stock liquidity,” Unpublished paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokyo Stock Exchange (2012) Guide to TSE Trading Methodology: arrowhead. Tokyo: Tokyo Stock Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokyo Stock Exchange (2014), What is arrowhead? (in Japanese). Available at http://www.tse.or.jp/rules/stock/arrowhead/info.html (accessed July 15, 2014 ).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Keiichi Kubota & Hitoshi Takehara

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kubota, K., Takehara, H. (2015). Price Discovery Process Before and After the Introduction of the “arrowhead” Trading System at the Tokyo Stock Exchange. In: Reform and Price Discovery at the Tokyo Stock Exchange: From 1990 to 2012. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137540393_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics