Pedagogical Prompts: Designing Experiences to Promote Deep Learning

  • Nicola Yelland


This chapter focuses on the ways in which the Learning by Design theoretical framework acts as a pedagogical prompt for teachers so that they are able to create learning experiences that complement the range of pedagogies described as knowledge processes and support 21st century skills and deep learning. The chapter discusses a learning module about the topic of “Living Things” that is an essential component of the National Curriculum for Science in Australia. The learning module was designed to support learning about living things in the early years (Kindergarten (4–5 years of age) to Year 3 (8–9 years of age)) and includes activities that could be achieved at a variety of levels as well as across the knowledge processes of experiencing, conceptualizing, analyzing and applying.


National Curriculum Hermit Crab Knowledge Process Learning Module Living Thing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AUSVELS Science Content-structure [accessed February 18, 2015].
  2. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Fullan, M. (2012). Great to Excellent: Launching the Next Stage of Ontario’s Education Agenda. Toronto, Canada: OISE.Google Scholar
  4. Fullan, M. (2013). Stratosphere: Integrating Technology, Pedagogy and Change Knowledge. Toronto, Canada: Pearson.Google Scholar
  5. Fullan, M. & Langworthy, M. (2014). A Rich Seam: How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. London: Pearson. Scholar
  6. Kalantzis, M. & Cope, W.W. (2004). Designs for learning. E-Learning, 1(1), 38–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalantzis, M. & Cope, W.W. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 200–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kalantzis, M. & Cope, W.W. (2012). New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education. (Second Edition. ed.). Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Partnerships for the 21st Century. (2008). 21st Century Skills, Education & Competitiveness: A Resource and Policy Guide. Washington, DC: The Partnership for 21st Century Skills.Google Scholar
  10. Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Yelland, N. J. (2007). Shift to the Future: Rethinking Learning with New Technologies in Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Yelland, N.J. & Gilbert, C.L. (2013). iPlay, iLearn, iGrow. Research report presented to IBM.,%20iLearn%20%26%20iGrow.pdf [accessed February 18, 2015].
  13. Yelland, N.J. & Gilbert, C.L. (2013). SmartStart: Creating new contexts for learning in the 21st century. Research report presented to IBM. [accessed February 18, 2015].
  14. Yelland, N. J., Butler, D., & Diezmann, C. (2014) Early Mathematical Explorations (2nd ed.). Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Yelland, N., Cope, W., & Kalantzis, M. (2008). Learning by design: Creating pedagogical frameworks for knowledge building in the 21st century (Special Invited Issue). Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yelland, N.J., Lee, L., O’Rourke, M., & Harrison, C. (2008). Rethinking Early Childhood Education. Milton Keynes, UK: OUP.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Nicola Yelland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Yelland

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations