Abstract
This chapter discusses the ‘learning by design’ concept of the Pedagogy of Multiliteracies in a Brazilian project. It first contextualizes the arrival of the literacies/multiliteracies/new learning ideas in Brazilian schools and academia. This came at an opportune moment, after the ‘years of lead’ of the dictatorship. In the Brazilian context, Paulo Freire’s ideas had in the 1960s brought new insights and new breath to education in Brazil. These were — in terms of a nationwide public education program — somewhat invisible in the 1960s but rescued in the late 1980s and beginning of the 1990s. Much discussion about the suitability of particular literacy approaches has gained academic focus since then. The Multiliteracies/new learning proposals have found resonance in Brazil, in view of their affinity with debates that had been disseminated by Freire a few decades before. The Multiliteracies/new literacies founding theories have enabled a reconfiguration of those studies in the face of a new socio-historic movement in Brazil and abroad.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brockmeier, J. (1996). Explaining the interpretive mind. Human Development, 39, 287, 295.
Bruner, J. (1997). Realidade mental, mundos possíveis. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Ed. Artes Médicas.
Castells, M. (1999). A Sociedade em Rede. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
Cazden, C., Lin, A., Luke, A. & Freebody, P. (2004). The Singapore Classroom Coding System. Technical Report. Singapore: Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice.
Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (Eds) (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge.
Elias, J. (1994). Paulo Freire: Pedagogue of Liberation. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated Language and Learning. New York, London, England: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2013). The Anti-Education Era. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
Gee, J. P. & Hayes, E.R. (2011). Language and Learning in the Digital Age. London and New York: Routledge.
Goodman, N. (1981). Twisted tales; or, story, study and symphony. In W. J. T. Mitchel (Org.), On Narrative (pp. 99–116). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Goody, J. & Watt I. (1963). The consequences of literacy. Contemporary Studies in Society and History, 5:304–45. Republished in J. Goody, (ed.) (1968). Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge University Press.
Irwin, J. (2012). Paulo Freire’s Philosophy of Education: Origins, Developments, Impacts and Legacies. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2008). New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education. Cambridge, MA, New York, NY, Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Kress, G. (2003). Reading as Semiosis: Interpreting the World and Ordering the World. In Literacy in the New Media Age. London and New York: Routledge.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London and New York: Routledge.
Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2003). New Literacies: Changing Knowledge and Classroom Learning. England and New York: Open University Press.
Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2008). Knowledge and Learning in New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education. Cambridge, UK, New York and Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2011). Literacies: Social, Cultural and Historical Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang.
Luke, A. (2004). Two takes on the Critical. In B. Norton and K. Toohey (Eds), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning (p. 21–29). Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Luke, A., Freebody, P., Cazden, C. & Lin, A. (2004). Singapore Pedagogy Coding Scheme. Technical Report. Singapore: Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice.
Luke, A., Woods, A. & Weir, K. (2013). Curriculum, Syllabus Design and Equity: A Primer and Model. New York and London: Routledge.
Muspratt, S., Luke, A. & Freebody, P. (1997) Constructing Critical Literacies. Teaching and Learning Textual Practice. St Leonards, UK: Hampton Press.
New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
New London Group (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. Designing social futures. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds), Multiliteracies. Literacy Learning and the Design of Socialf Futures. London and New York: Routledge.
Olson, D. R. (1994). The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. G. (Eds) (1991). Literacy and Orality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and Narrative, Volume 3. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Street, Brian V. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5, 2, 77–91.
van Leeuwen, T. (2011). Multimodality. In J. Simpson (ed.) The Routledge Handbook in Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Walkyria Monte Mór
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mór, W.M. (2015). Learning by Design: Reconstructing Knowledge Processes in Teaching and Learning Practices. In: Cope, B., Kalantzis, M. (eds) A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55253-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53972-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)