Skip to main content

Educating Citizen Scholars: Interdisciplinary First-Year Seminars at the University of Guelph

  • Chapter
Universities, the Citizen Scholar and the Future of Higher Education

Part of the book series: Palgrave Critical University Studies ((PCU))

Abstract

Long ago, in another time and place, in another world really, Alvin Toffler published a prescient book entitled Future Shock (1970). Toffler outlined the trauma, disorientation and stress that would affect individuals and societies as a result of ‘too much change in too short a period of time’, in particular, the accelerated pace of technological change and the concomitant information overload.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bloom, Benjamin S. and David R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E.L. The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University, Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities. NY: Stoney Brook, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavote, Steven E., and Karen Kopera-Frye. ‘Subject-based first-year experience courses: Questions about program effectiveness.’ Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition 16, no. 2 (2004): 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, Arthur W., and Zelda F. Gamson. ‘Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education.’ AAHE Bulletin 3 (1987): 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkin, M. J., and R. P. Precians. ‘Award-winning university teachers’ concepts of teaching.’ Higher Education 24, no. 4 (1992): 483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Daniel B., and Elizabeth G. Marsh. ‘What type of first-year seminar is most effective? A comparison of thematic seminars and college transition/success seminars.’ Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition 21, no. 1 (2009): 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, David B., Janice Odom, and Arlene Malinowski. ‘Inquiry, critical thinking, and first-year programs.’ In Virginia S. Lee (ed.), Teaching and Learning Through Inquiry: A Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors. Stylus Pub Llc, 2004, 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, Mick. ‘Linking research and teaching exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning.’ In Ronald Barnett (ed.), Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching. Open University Press Berkshire, England, (2005), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, Kim J. ‘The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention.’ Active Learning in Higher Education 14, no. 3 (2013): 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyers, Albert D., and Monica Neset Joslin. ‘The first year seminar as a predictor of academic achievement and persistence.’ Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition 10, no. 1 (1998): 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessup-Anger, Jody E. ‘What’s the point?: An exploration of students’ motivation to learn in a first-year seminar.’ The Journal of General Education 60, no. 2 (2011): 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krometis, Leigh-Anne H., Elena P. Clark, Vincent Gonzalez, and Michelle E. Leslie. ‘The “death” of disciplines: development of a team-taught course to provide an interdisciplinary perspective for first-year students.’ College Teaching 59, no. 2 (2011): 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattuca, Lisa R., Lois J. Voigt, and Kimberly Q. Fath. ‘Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? Theoretical support and researchable questions.’ The Review of Higher Education 28, no. 1 (2004): 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machemer, Patricia L., and Pat Crawford. ‘Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom.’ Active Learning in Higher Education 8, no. 1 (2007): 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamrick, M. ‘The first-year seminar: An historical perspective.’ In B. F. Tobolowsky (ed.), The 2003 National Survey on First-Year Seminars: Continuing Innovations in the Collegiate Curriculum. Columbia, SC: Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 2005, 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, Craig. ‘Researching the first year experience: where to from here?’ Higher Education Research and Development 20, no. 2 (2001): 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Kirsten, and Robert Schweitzer. ‘Who succeeds at university? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students.’ Higher Education Research and Development 20, no. 1 (2001): 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Jacqueline and Alastair Summerlee, ‘The impact of problem-based learning in an interdisciplinary first-year program on student learning behaviour.’ Canadian Journal of Higher Education 37, no. 3 (2007): 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Stephen R., and Randy L. Swing. ‘Understanding how first-year seminars affect persistence.’ Research in Higher Education 47, no. 1 (2006): 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. A., A. Cater, G. K. Clambey, M. Garrison, R. A. Hanson, R. L. Harrold, W. M. Henderson, A. J. Keogh, and H. E. Lindgren. ‘Education for interdisciplinary, multicultural, and international understanding.’ In Frontiers in Education Conference, 1993. Twenty-Third Annual Conference. ‘Engineering Education: Renewing America’s Technology’, Proceedings, 1993, pp. 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I. ‘First-year experience as terrain of failure or platform for development? critical choices for higher education.’ In B. Leibowitz, A. Van der Merwe, and S. Van Schalkwyk (eds.), Focus on First-Year Success: Perspectives Emerging from South Africa and Beyond. Stellenbosch: African Sun Media, 2009, 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebleton, Michael J., Murray Jensen, and Gary Peter. ‘Enhancing student engagement in a multidisciplinary, first-year experience course.’ College Teaching Methods & Styles 6 (2010): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerlee, Alastair and Jacqueline Murray. ‘The impact of enquiry-based learning on academic performance and student engagement.’ Canadian Journal of Higher Education 40 (2010): 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobolowsky, B. F. The 2003 National Survey of First-Year Seminars: Continuing Innovations in the Collegiate Curriculum. The First-Year Experience Monograph Series No. 41. National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, Columbia, SC, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, Alvin. Future Shock. New York: Random House, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanca-Thibault, M., Shepherd & Staley, C. ‘Personal, professional, and political effects of teaching a first-year seminar: A faculty census.’ Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition 14 (2002): 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, Maryellen. ‘Focus on learning, transform teaching.’ Change 35, no. 5 (2003): 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youatt, June, and Kim A. Wilcox. ‘Intentional and integrated learning in a new cognitive age: A signature pedagogy for undergraduate education in the twenty-first century.’ Peer Review 10, no. 4 (2008): 24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Jacqueline Murray

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murray, J. (2016). Educating Citizen Scholars: Interdisciplinary First-Year Seminars at the University of Guelph. In: Arvanitakis, J., Hornsby, D.J. (eds) Universities, the Citizen Scholar and the Future of Higher Education. Palgrave Critical University Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137538697_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics