Skip to main content

Eugenic Nationalism, Biopolitics, and the Masculinization of Hysteria: Historical and Theoretical Reflections

  • Chapter
  • 318 Accesses

Part of the book series: Global Masculinities ((GLMAS))

Abstract

As R. W. Connell and James W. Messerschmidt have pointed out in their critical reevaluation of “hegemonic masculinity” as an analytical category, the term has tended to rely heavily, especially within psychoanalytic scholarship, on “the notion of masculinity as an assemblage of traits” or “trait terminology.” According to Connell and Messerschmidt, it is the “trait approach” that results in fixed conceptualizations of masculinity.1 Connell and Messerschmidt’s observation draws attention to the problem of essentializing approaches to masculinity. Yet at the same time, I would argue, trait terminology has a very special relevance for historians of gender and nation. In her review of theoretical approaches to the subject, Joane Nagel points out the importance of attending to how “the value of and adherence to… normative manly traits vary by time and place.”2 Similarly, George L. Mosse presents “normative masculinity” as an assemblage of manly traits that can be harnessed in the service of nation-states.3 Thus, methodologically speaking, the historical study of masculinity and the nation must necessarily involve examining which traits become manly at specific historical junctures, and how discourses on such manly traits become interwoven with discourses on nation building.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. W. Connell and James W. Messerschmidt, “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept,” Gender &; Society 19, no. 6 (2005): 847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Joane Nagel, “Masculinity and Nationalism: Gender and Sexuality in the Making of Nations,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 21, no. 2 (March 1998): 245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. George L. Mosse, The Image of Man: The Creation of Modern Masculinity (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See, for example, Mark S. Micale, Hysterical Men: The Hidden History of Male Nervous Illness (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Joanna Bourke, Dismembering the Male: Men’s Bodies, Britain and the Great War (London: Reaktion Books, 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andreas Killen, Berlin Electropolis: Shock, Nerves, and German Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Paul Lerner, Hysterical Men: War, Psychiatry, and the Politics of Trauma in Germany, 1890–1930 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michel Foucault, “The Means of Correct Training,” in The Foucault Reader, ed. Paul Rabinow (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984), 204.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Ben Barker-Benfield, “The Spermatic Economy: A Nineteenth Century View of Sexuality,” Feminist Studies 1, no. 1 (Summer 1972): 45–74;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lisa Jean Moore, Sperm Counts: Overcome by Man’s Most Precious Fluid (New York: New York University Press, 2007), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daniel J. Kevles, In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995), 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. H. Melville, “Eugenics and Military Service,” Eugenics Review 2, no. 1 (1910): 54.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anna Davin, “Imperialism and Motherhood,” in Tensions of Empire Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World, ed. Frederick Cooper and Ann Laura Stoler (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), 89.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paul Dubois, The Psychic Treatment of Nervous Disorders: The Psychoneuroses and Their Moral Treatment (New York: Funk &; Wagnalls, 1909), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas Lemke, “‘The Birth of Biopolitics’—Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-Liberal Governmentality,” Economy and Society 30, no. 2 (2001): 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wendy Kline, Building a Better Race: Gender, Sexuality, and Eugenics from the Turn of the Century to the Baby Boom (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001), 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ruth Miller, The Limits of Bodily Integrity: Abortion, Adultery, and Rape Legislation in Comparative Perspective (Farnham: Ashgate, 2007), 151–152. Emphasis mine.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Michael Stolberg, Experiencing Illness and the Sick Body in Early Modern Europe (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 170.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Janet Oppenheim, “Shattered Nerves”: Doctors, Patients, and Depression in Victorian England (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 8. For some of the difficulties encountered with the eighteenth-century somatic model of mental illness, see also Kevles’s discussion of the medical causes of insanity in twentieth-century legal circles, Kevles, In the Name of Eugenics, 49.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. George M. Beard, American Nervousness, Its Causes and Consequences (New York, Putnam, 1881).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Brian Dillon, Tormented Hope: Nine Hypochondriac Lives (London: Penguin, 2010), 87.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oppenheim, Shattered Nerves, 152. See also Andrew Scull, Hysteria: The Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 97.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Michel Foucault, “The Birth of the Asylum,” in The Foucault Reader, ed. Paul Rabinow (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984), 150.

    Google Scholar 

  24. In 1881, men had been admitted to a new outpatient clinic at the Salpêtrière asylum-turned hospital in Paris, followed by the famous proclamation of the Salpêtrière neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot that “hysteria in the male is not as rare as is thought.” Georges Didi-Huberman, The Invention of Hysteria: Charcot and the Photographic Iconography of the Salpêtrière, trans. Alisa Hartz (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003), 80.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. H. R. Rivers, “War-Neurosis and Military Training,” in Instinct and the Unconscious: A Contribution to a Biological Theory of the Psycho-Neuroses (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1920), 205–228. See also Dubois, Psychic Treatment, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  26. George L. Mosse, “Shell-Shock as a Social Disease,” Journal of Contemporary History 35, no. 1 (January 2000): 103–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Pablo Dominguez Andersen Simon Wendt

Copyright information

© 2015 Pablo Dominguez Andersen and Simon Wendt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loutfi, A. (2015). Eugenic Nationalism, Biopolitics, and the Masculinization of Hysteria: Historical and Theoretical Reflections. In: Andersen, P.D., Wendt, S. (eds) Masculinities and the Nation in the Modern World. Global Masculinities. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137536105_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics