Abstract
Hobbes is committed to a voluntarist conception of obligation, according to which we undertake duties and obligations only voluntarily. Legal obligations are a species of obligation and thus created in the same manner: just as we acquire obligations generally by transferring a right, we acquire specifically legal obligations when we transfer our right to govern ourselves in the act of submission. This interpretation rejects a range of contemporary readings, including Hampton’s view that the laws of nature are hypothetical imperatives and not genuine obligations, Martinich’s view that the laws of nature obligate universally because of God’s irresistible power, and Lloyd’s view that the laws of nature embody Rawlsian natural duties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Michael Byron
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Byron, M. (2015). Obligation. In: Submission and Subjection in Leviathan: Good Subjects in the Hobbesian Commonwealth. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137535290_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137535290_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50694-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53529-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)