Skip to main content
  • 134 Accesses

Abstract

Hobbes is committed to a voluntarist conception of obligation, according to which we undertake duties and obligations only voluntarily. Legal obligations are a species of obligation and thus created in the same manner: just as we acquire obligations generally by transferring a right, we acquire specifically legal obligations when we transfer our right to govern ourselves in the act of submission. This interpretation rejects a range of contemporary readings, including Hampton’s view that the laws of nature are hypothetical imperatives and not genuine obligations, Martinich’s view that the laws of nature obligate universally because of God’s irresistible power, and Lloyd’s view that the laws of nature embody Rawlsian natural duties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Michael Byron

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Byron, M. (2015). Obligation. In: Submission and Subjection in Leviathan: Good Subjects in the Hobbesian Commonwealth. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137535290_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics