A Mathematical Analysis of Badminton Scoring Systems
Although the sport of badminton originated about 2000 years ago, the Badminton Association of England published the first proper set of rules in 1893. The International Badminton Federation (IBF) was formed in 1934 and is now established as the game’s governing body. The rules remained almost unchanged until 2002, when the IBF introduced a series of experimental rule changes in order to make the game faster and more exciting. In 2006, some new rules were introduced for the Commonwealth Games in Melbourne, Australia, and this article evaluates these variations.
KeywordsMathematical Analysis Operational Research Society Table Tennis Posterior Predictive Distribution Setting Option
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barnett T, Brown A and Pollard G (2006). Reducing the likelihood of long tennis matches. J Sports Sci Med 5: 567–574.Google Scholar
- Barnett TJ and Clarke SR (2002). Using Microsoft® Excel to model a tennis match. In: Cohen G and Langtry T (eds). Proceedings of the Sixth Australian Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sport. Bond University: Queensland, pp 63–68.Google Scholar
- Bernardo JM and Smith AFM (1993). Bayesian Theory. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
- Clarke SR (1979). Tie point strategy in American and international squash and badminton. Res Quart 50: 729–734.Google Scholar
- Clarke SR and Norman JM (1979). Comparison of North American and international squash scoring systems—analytical results. Res Quart 50: 723–728.Google Scholar
- Miles RE (1984). Symmetric sequential analysis: The efficiencies of sports scoring systems (with particular reference to those of tennis). J R Stat Soc B 46: 93–108.Google Scholar
- Norman JM and Clarke SR (1978). What chance playing up to ten? Squash Player Int June: 50–51.Google Scholar
- Renick J (1976). Optional strategy at decision points. Res Quart 47: 562–568.Google Scholar
- Renick J (1977). Tie point strategy in badminton and international squash. Res Quart 48: 492–498.Google Scholar
- Schutz RW and Kinsey WK (1977). Comparison of North American and international squash scoring systems—a computer simulation. Res Quart 48: 248–251.Google Scholar
- Sève C and Poizat G (2005). Table tennis scoring systems and expert players’ exploration activity. Int J Sport Psychol 36: 320–336.Google Scholar
- Stewart I (1991). Game, Set and Math: Enigmas and Conundrums. Penguin: London.Google Scholar