Abstract
The reshaping of the global system requires a fundamental rethinking of what middle powers need to do to navigate the fast-shifting global geometry of power. In a world that privileges scaling up, across the spectrum from big emerging countries to an overarching concert of powers with an extended scope of regulatory authority, and elaborate and well-resourced public-private transnational networks, secondary players could well be marginalized. However, the middle power model exhibits an impressive—albeit not unchallenged—capacity for revitalization, as in past eras of transition with a shift away from a unipolar locus of power.1 Moreover, there is strong evidence that this trajectory of relocation can move toward an extension as opposed to a contraction, beyond the model of traditional middle powers. What can be described as an extended “rising middle,” encompassing both established and nontraditional middle powers, if still structurally constrained in many ways, exhibits a capacity for innovation as both receptors and agents of change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Cooper, R. Higgott and K. Nossal (eds), Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order (Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press; and Melbourne, VIC: University of Melbourne Press, 1993)
Cooper (ed.), Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers at the Cold War (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1997).
Evan Potter, Branding Canada: Projecting Canada’s Soft Power through Public Diplomacy (Montreal, QC and Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2009), p. 104.
Jordon Michael Smith, “Reinventing Canada: Stephen Harper’s Conservative Revolution,” World Affairs (March/April 2012), at http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/article/reinventing-canada-stephen-harper’s-conservative-revolution.
South Korea’s President Lee, quoted in B. Hwang and Y. Jo, “Bridging the Global Gap: Korea’s Leadership Agenda for the G20,” Joint US—Korea Academic Studies, no. 21 (2010), at http://www.scribd.com/doc/81752422/Bridging-the-Global-Gap-Korea’s-Leadership-Agenda-for-the-G-20–by-Balbina-Hwang-and-Youngji-Jo.
Alexandroff and A. F. Cooper (eds), Rising States, Rising Institutions: Can the World Be Governed? (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2010).
Wilson and R. Purushothman, “Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050,” Global Economics Paper no. 99 (New York: Goldman Sachs, 2003).
Ikenberry, “The Future of the Liberal World Order,” Foreign Affairs (May/June 2011), pp. 56–68.
Chin, “Remaking the Architecture: Emerging Powers, Self-insuring and Regional Insulation,” International Affairs, vol. 86, no. 3 (2010), pp. 693–715.
Barma, E. Ratner, and Steven Weber, “A World without the West,” The National Interest, no. 90 (2007), pp. 23–30.
Zakaria, The Post-American World and the Rise of the Rest (London: Allen Lane, 2008).
Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton, 2002).
Cooper and J. Mo, “Middle Powers Can Punch above Their Weight,” Wall Street Journal (November 4, 2011).
Philip Iglauer, “MIKTA to Raise ‘Middle Power Voice’: Five Countries, including South Korea and Mexico, Band together to Increase their Clout in G20,” Korea Herald (April 20, 2014).
Cox, “Middle Powermanship: Japan and the Future of the World Order,” in R. W. Cox and T. Sinclair (eds), Approaches to World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 241–275.
Keohane, “Lilliputian’s Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics,” International Organizations, vol. 23, no. 2 (1969), p. 296.
Ibbitson and T. Perkins, “How Canada Made the G20 Happen,” The Globe and Mail (June 18, 2010).
English, R. Thakur and A. F. Cooper (eds), Reforming from the Top: A Leaders’ 20 Summit (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2005).
Sheldon Alberts, “G20 Sets Global Economic Agenda,” Canada.com (September 26, 2009).
Sheldon Alberts, “G20 Leaders Vow to Stabilize Economy,” Canada.com (September 26, 2009).
Andrew F. Cooper, “Civil Society Relationships with the G20: An Extension of the G8 Template or Distinctive Pattern of Engagement?,” Global Society, vol. 27, no. 2 (2013), pp. 179–200.
Wood, “A Break with the Past or a Natural Progression: Mexico and the Heiligendamm Process,” in A. F. Cooper and A. Antkiewicz (eds), Emerging Powers in Global Governance: Lessons from the Heiligendamm Process (Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier Press, 2008), pp. 193–212.
President Lula quoted in P Gillespie, “BICS Highlight Skewed Nature of Global Power,” Irish Times (March 31, 2012), at http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2012/0331/1224314156764.html.
Ingyu Oh, “The Globalization of K-Pop: Korea’s Place in the Global Music Industry,” Korea Observer, vol. 44, no. 3 (2013), pp. 389–409.
Allan Gotlieb, “Cultural Diplomacy: A Question of Self-interest,” in “Notes for an Address before the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada,” Winnipeg (November 12, 1979), Statements and Speeches no. 79/20 (Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada, Department of External Affairs, Information Division, 1979).
Joanna Elfving-Hwang, “South Korean Cultural Diplomacy and Brokering ‘K-Culture’ outside Asia,” Korean Histories, vol. 4, no. 1 (2013), at http://www.koreanhistories.org/files/Volume_4_l/ElfvingHwang%204.1.pdf
Quoted in Nicholas J. Cull, “‘Bulging Ideas’: Making Korea’s Public Diplomacy Work,” Issue Brief no. 37 (Seoul: ASAN Institute for Policy Studies, December 16, 2012), p. 1, at http://en.asaninst.org/contents/issue-brief-no-37-bulging-ideas-making-koreas-public-diplomacy-work/.
Jan Melissen, “Public Diplomacy,” in Andrew F. Cooper, Jorge Heine and Ramesh Thakur (eds), Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 441.
Rizal Sukma, “Soft Power and Public Diplomacy: The Case of Indonesia,” in Sook Jong Lee and Jan Melissen (eds), Public Diplomacy and Soft Power in East Asia (New York: Palgrave, 2011), pp. 91–116
Siswo Pramono, “Resources of Indonesian Soft Power Diplomacy,” The Jakarta Post (June 28, 2010).
Ian Hall and Frank Smith, “The Struggle for Soft Power in Asia: Public Diplomacy and Regional Competition,” Asian Security, vol. 9, no. 1 (2013), pp. 1–18.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Jan Melissen and Yul Sohn
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooper, A.F. (2015). Soft Power and the Recalibration of Middle Powers: South Korea as an East Asian Leader and Canada as the Exemplar of the Traditional Model. In: Melissen, J., Sohn, Y. (eds) Understanding Public Diplomacy in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137532299_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137532299_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57981-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53229-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)