Advertisement

Assessing the Impact of Social Grants on Inequality: A South African Case Study

  • Reinhard Schiel
  • Murray Leibbrandt
  • David Lam
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to investigate the role of social grants in reducing income inequality during the first 15 years of democracy in South Africa. Since the transition to democracy in 1994, the South African government has dramatically expanded this system of social grants. Building on an existing but racially biased social security system developed by the apartheid government, the social grant system was expanded to include all races and then, through the 1990s, additional social transfers were instituted.

Keywords

Income Inequality Labour Income Total Income Income Source Total Household Income 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azevedo J., Inchaust G., & Sanfelice V. (2013a). Deconstructing the Decline in Inequality in Latin America. World Bank Policy Research Papers 6715.Google Scholar
  2. Azevedo, J. P., Inchauste, G., Olivieri, S., Saavedra, J., & Winkler, H. (2013b). Is Labour Income Responsible for Poverty Reduction? World Bank Policy Research Papers 6414.Google Scholar
  3. Barros, R. P. D., Carvalho, M. D., Franco, S., & Mendonça, R. (2006). Uma análise das principais causas da queda recente na desigualdade de renda brasileira. http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/2699/1/TD_1203.pdf.
  4. Essama-Nssah, B. (2012). Identification of Sources of Variation in Poverty Outcomes. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, No. 5954.Google Scholar
  5. Ferreira, F., Leite, P., & Litchfield, J. (2008) The Rise and Fall of Brazilian Inequality: 1981–2004, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 12(S2), 199–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferreira, Francisco H.G. (2010) Distributions in Motion: Economic Growth, Inequality and Poverty Dynamics. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5424. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leibbrandt, M. V., Woolard, C. D., & Woolard, I. D. (1996). The contribution of income components to income inequality in South Africa: a decomposable Gini analysis (No. 125).Google Scholar
  8. Leibbrandt, M., Woolard, I., & De Villiers, L. (2009) National Income Dynamics Study Technical Paper No. 1. University of Cape Town; Methodology: Report on NIDS Wave 1.Google Scholar
  9. Lerman, R. I. & Yitzhaki, S. (1985). Income inequality effects by income source: a new approach and applications to the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 151–156.Google Scholar
  10. PSLSD, Project for Statistics on Living Standards and Development. 1994. South Africans Rich and Poor: Baseline Household Statistics. South African Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  11. Shorrocks, A. F. (1982). Inequality decomposition by factor components. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 193–211.Google Scholar
  12. Silber, J. (1989). Factor Components, Population Subgroups and the Computation of the Gini Index of Inequality. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stark, O., Taylor, J. E., & Yitzhaki, S. (1986). Remittances and inequality. The Economic Journal, 722–740.Google Scholar
  14. United Nations Children’s Fund (2008). Review of the Child Support Grant: Uses, Implementation and Obstacles. Community Agency for Social Enquiry.Google Scholar
  15. Wan, G. H. (2001). Changes in regional inequality in rural China: decomposing the Gini index by income sources. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45(3), 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wilson, F. (1995). Lessons from the Project for Statistics on Living Standards and Development: the South African story. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  17. Woolard. I. & Leibbrandt, M., (2010). The Evolution and Impact of Unconditional Cash Transfers in South Africa. A Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit Working Paper Number 51. Cape Town: SALDRU, University of Cape Town.136-161Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reinhard Schiel
  • Murray Leibbrandt
  • David Lam

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations