Skip to main content

‘The People’s Bread’: A Social History of Joseph Chamberlain and the Tariff Reform Campaign

  • Chapter
Joseph Chamberlain
  • 319 Accesses

Abstract

As the election results of late January were declared, evening after evening, and the columns of small ‘M’s denoting elected members of the new 1906 Parliament that supported the Prime Minister, Henry Campbell-Bannerman, chased the opposing ‘O’s across the graph that topped each morning’s issue of The Times, the paper itself became increasingly confident about the causes of the Liberal landslide. On the morning of 17 January, the day before the Birmingham polls were called and Joseph Chamberlain’s own constituency result declared, The Times mused that for all the confidence Tariff Reform organisers had about the result, it would be, crucially, a limited one. ‘The further they go afield the more difficult does their task become of getting “the man in the street” to realize that the “big loaf versus little loaf” cry is a meaningless shibboleth’, the paper concluded.1 As more results came in and the sheer scale of the Liberal victory became apparent, the more the press was willing to venture into analysis. Two days before, on the 15th, the Manchester Guardian had already passed judgement on the results in Lancashire. ‘A candidate had only to be a Free Trader to get in’, it argued, ‘he had only to be a Protectionist to lose all chance.’2 By the 20th the Spectator felt able to declare that the fact ‘that the election was fought and won on the issue of free-trade is beyond dispute’.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. A.K. Russell, Liberal Landslide: The General Election of 1906 (Newton Abbot: David and Charles), 1973, pp. 65, 83.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Pugh, The Making of Modern British Politics: 1867–1945 (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002), p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Judd, Radical Joe: A Life of Joseph Chamberlain (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1993), p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.L. Crosby, Joseph Chamberlain: A Most Radical Imperialist (London: I.B. Taurus, 2011), p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.T. Marsh, Joseph Chamberlain: Entrepreneur in Politics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994), p. 563

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Lawrence, ‘The Culture of Elections in Modern Britain’, History, 96 (2011), pp. 461–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Trentmann, ‘National Identity and Consumer Politics: Free Trade and Tariff Reform’, in D. Winch and P. O’Brien (eds), The Political Economy of British Historical Experience 1688–1914 (Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 216–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Amery, The Life of Joseph Chamberlain, vol. 4 (London: Macmillan, 1951), p. 452.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.W. Boyd (ed.), Mr Chamberlain’s Speeches, vol. 2 (London: Constable and Company Ltd, 1914), Birmingham 4 November 1903, pp. 253–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Roberts, Political Movements in Urban England 1832–1914 (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), pp. 118–27.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Thompson, British Political Culture and the Idea of ‘Public Opinion’ 1867–1914 (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 243–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. In particular see A. Sykes, Tariff Reform in British Politics 1903–1913 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979), pp. 55–74

    Google Scholar 

  13. and G.R. Searle, The Quest for National Efficiency: A Study in British Politics and Politics Thought, 1899–1914 (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1971), pp. 142–70.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E.H.H. Green and D.M. Tanner (eds), The Strange Survival of Liberal England: Political Leaders, Moral Values and the Reception of Economic Debate (Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 1–36.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. See, for instance, A. Clark, ‘The Rhetoric of Chartist Domesticity: Gender, Language, and Class in the 1830s and 1840s’, Journal of British Studies, 31.1 (1992), pp. 62–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. O’Day and D. Englander, Mr Charles Booth’s Inquiry: Life and Labour of the People in London Reconsidered (London: Continuum, 1993), pp. 42–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B.S. Rowntree, Poverty: A Study of Town Life. (York: Policy Press Edition, 2000), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lady F. Bell, At the Works: A Study of a Manufacturing Town (London: Virago Edition, 1985), p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Jay, Joseph Chamberlain: A Political Study (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981), pp. 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Gazeley and A. Newell, ‘Poverty in Edwardian Britain’, Economic History Review, 64.1 (2011), p. 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Although the phrase itself was coined by Thomas Carlyle in 1839, the Condition of England question really came of age in the Edwardian era. See, for example, W. Booth, In Darkest England and the Way Out (London: McCorquodale and Co., 1890);

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Masterman (ed.), The Heart of Empire: A Discussion of the Problems of Modern City Life in England (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1901) and, for a more everyday use, ‘A National Emergency’, The British Medical Journal, 1.2570 (2 April 1910), pp. 831–2.

    Google Scholar 

  23. B. Doyle, ‘A Crisis of Urban Conservatism? Politics and Organisation in Edwardian Norwich’, Parliamentary History, 31.3 (Oct. 2012), p. 430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. I. Cawood, The Liberal Unionist Party: A History (London: I.B. Tauris, 2012), p. 230.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Brodie, The Politics of the Poor: The East End of London 1885–1914 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004), pp. 42–3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Otte and P. Readman (eds), By-Elections in British Politics, 1832–1914 (Oxford: Boydell Press, 2013), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Dennis, English Industrial Cities of the Nineteenth Century: A Social Geography (Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp. 186–99;

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Dunbabin, ‘Electoral Reforms and Their Outcome 1865–1914’, in T. Gourvish and A. O’Day (eds), Later Victorian Britain, 1867–1900 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1988), p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brodie, Politics of the Poor, p. 47; D. Englander, Landlord and Tenant in Urban Britain 1838–1918 (Oxford University Press, 1983), pp. 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Oliver Betts

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Betts, O. (2016). ‘The People’s Bread’: A Social History of Joseph Chamberlain and the Tariff Reform Campaign. In: Cawood, I., Upton, C. (eds) Joseph Chamberlain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137528858_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137528858_7

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-70803-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52885-8

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics