Skip to main content

Taylor’s Metaphysics, Merleau-Ponty and the Natural Environment

  • Chapter
Charles Taylor’s Ecological Conversations
  • 140 Accesses

Abstract

Taylor has stated that he concurs with aspects of Deep Ecology through his evaluative and interpretivist framework. I use his work on Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s direct coping and perception to explain this affinity with Deep Ecology. This involves exploring the meaning and value provided by nature which involves how we are open to a world which can be explored, learnt and then theorised about.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The Enlightenment emphasised a new age of science and technology to overcome myth and superstition - this epoch ushered in the view that humanity could control the natural environment. For environmental purposes, Taylor returns to the work of Hegel’s G. W. F. Hegel, Philosophy of Nature, edited and translated by A. V. Miller (foreword by J. N. Findlay) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Baird Callicott, ‘Humes Is/Ought Dichotomy and the Relation of Ecology to Leopold’s Land Ethic’, Environmental Ethics, 4(2) (1982): 163-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aldo Leopold, A Sand Country Almanac (New York: Sierra Club/Ballantine, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Baird Callicott, ‘Rolstrom on Intrinsic Value: A Deconstruction’, Environmental Ethics, 14(2) (1992):129-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charles Taylor, ‘Overcoming Epistomology’. In Philosophical Arguments (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995): 1. Charles Taylor, ‘The Validity of Transcendental Arguments’. In Philosophical Arguments, edited by Charles Taylor (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995): 23-25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor, ‘The Validity of Transcendental Arguments’, 25. And Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 79 (1978-79): 153.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Charles Taylor, ‘Overcoming Epistemology’. In Philosophical Arguments (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Charles Taylor, ‘What Is Secularity’. In Transcending Boundaries in Philosophy and Theology: Reason, Meaning and Experience, edited by K. Vanhoozer and Martin Warner (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2007): 60.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John McDowell, Mind and World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994): 85.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hubert L. Dreyfus, ‘Taylor’s Anti-Realism’. In Charles Taylor, edited by R. Abbey (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004): 66. Dreyfus was quoting a private communication with Taylor on anti-epistemology.

    Google Scholar 

  11. John Rundell, ‘Charles Taylor’s Search for Transcendence: Mystery, Suffering, Violence’. In Secularisations and Their Debates, Perspectives on the Return of Religion in the Contemporary West, edited by M. Sharpe and D. Nickelsen (Dordrecht: Springer, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Charles Taylor, Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975): 19.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Charles Taylor, ‘Heidegger, Language, and Ecology’. In Heidegger: A Critical Reader, edited by H. L. Dreyfus and H. Hall (Oxford: Blackwells, 1992): 247-269.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Charles Taylor, ‘Recovering the Sacred’, Inquiry 54(2) (2011): 117-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kenneth Baynes, ‘Self, Narrative and Self-Constitution: Revisiting Taylor’s “Self-Interpreting Animals’”, The Philosophical Forum, 41(4) (2010): 441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bryan G. Norton, ‘Epistemology and Environmental Values’, The Monist, 75(2) (1992): 224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Callicott’s response to this line of thinking see ‘Was Aldo Leopold a Pragmatist? Rescuing Leopold from the Imagination of Bryan Norton’ (with William Grove-Fanning, Jennifer Rowland, Daniel Baskind, Robert Heath French, and Kerry Walker) Environmental Values 18 (2009): 453-486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jim Cheney, ‘Beyond Subjectivism and Objectivism’, TheMonist, 75(2) (1992): 233.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Glen Lehman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lehman, G. (2015). Taylor’s Metaphysics, Merleau-Ponty and the Natural Environment. In: Charles Taylor’s Ecological Conversations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137524782_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics