Skip to main content

Transferable Media Pluralism Policies from Europe

  • Chapter
Media Power and Plurality

Part of the book series: Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business ((GMPB))

  • 343 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter will first look briefly at press and broadcasting subsidies comparatively across Europe, identifying general patterns and trends, before considering the significance of digital convergence for the question of subsidies for press, broadcasting, and new online content providers. It then turns to some transferable lessons from Europe, the aim being to relate to the future development of UK policy in the era of converged digital media. Specific case studies of transferable policies will include, from France, mechanisms for supporting national content production, notably the levy on all distributors of broadcasting content (including new mobile and online media operators). It is argued that this could provide the mechanism for funding a revived Public Service Publisher, in the shape of a ‘Channel Four for the Digital Era’, commissioning digital content from independent producers, whether from broadcasting, press, or online sectors. In the digital and internet era, with its converged media markets, and less scope for traditional structural and behavioural regulation, public intervention should focus on supporting diverse, quality media content production and distribution in order to maintain media pluralism. Yet, this innovation should not come at the expense of existing support for established public service broadcasters (PSBs) whose adaptation into public service media (PSM) institutions will be crucially important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ACT, AER, ENPA, EPC and VPRT (2009) Joint Letter to Commissioner Kroes on the Revision of the Broadcasting Communication. Brussels: ACT, AER, ENPA, EPC and VPRT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. and Weeds, H. (2007) ‘Public service broadcasting in the digital world’ In: Seabright, P. and von Hagen, J. (eds) The Economic Regulation of Broadcasting Markets: Evolving Technology and Challenges for Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–149.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Assemblée Nationale et Sénat (2007) LOI no 2009-258 du 5 mars 2009 relative à la communication audiovisuelle et au nouveau service public de la television (Paris: OJRF no 0056 du 7 mars).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardoel, J. and Vochteloo, M. (2008)’ squeezing public broadcasting from the mainstream to the margin? EU State Aid Policy vis-à-vis Public Service Broadcasting’, Paper Presented at the RIPE Conference, Public Service Media in the 21st Century: Participation, Partnership and Media Development, Mainz, Germany: 8–11 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardoel, J. and Vochteloo, M. (2012) ‘Conditional access for public service broadcasting to new media platforms: EU state aid policy vis-à-vis public service broadcasting-The Dutch case’ In: Just, N. and Puppis, M. (eds) Trends in Communication Policy Research: New Theories, Methods and Subjects, Bristol, UK, and Chicago, USA: Intellect, pp. 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, P. (2009) ‘New forms of funding for PSB’, Speech to a Seminar Organized by the Federation of Entertainment Unions, 22 June 2009: https://www.bectu.org.uk/news/315, date accessed 2 December 2014

  • BBC (2007) BBC Response to a New Approach to Public Service Content in the Digital Media Age http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/pspnewapproach/responses/bbc.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • BECTU (2007) Ofcom: ‘A New Approach to Public Services Content in the Digital Media Age’. BECTU Comments http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/pspnewapproach/responses/bectu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brevini, B. (2013) Public Service Broadcasting Online: A Comparative European Policy Study of PSB 2.0. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom (CPBF) (2007) Response to Ofcom’s Document: A New Approach to Public Service Content in the Digital Media Age: The Potential Role of the Public Service Publisher http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/pspnewapproach/responses/cpb.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Channel Four Television Corporation (2007) Channel 4 Response to the Ofcom Consultation: A New Approach to Public Service Content in the Digital Media Age-The Potential Role of the Public Service Publisher: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/con-sult/condocs/pspnewapproach/responses/4.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalition for Media Reform (2011) Time for Media Reform: Proposals for a Free and Accountable Media. London: CMR: http://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/time-for-media-reform.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Crauford Smith, R., Tambini, D., and Morisi, D. (2012) Regulating Media Plurality and Media Power in the 21st Century. London: LSE Media Policy Project, Media Policy Brief 7: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media%40lse/documents/MPP/Policy-Brief-7-Media-Pluralism.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crauford Smith, R. and Tambini, D. (2012) ‘Measuring media plurality in the United Kingdom: Policy choices and regulatory challenges’, Journal of Media Law, 4(1), 35–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., Fenton, N., and Freedman, D. (2012) Misunderstanding the Internet. Abingdon, UK, and New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagnaud M. (2006) Les Artisans de l’Imaginaire: Comment La Télévision Fabrique la Culture de Masse. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie Jr., L. and Schudson, M. (2009) ‘The reconstruction of American journalism’, Columbia Journalism Review, 19 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009) Communication from the Commission on the Application of State Aid Rules to Public Service Broadcasting. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities, 2009/C 257/01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstein, D., Cox, D., Donoghue, David, B., Graham, D., and Metzger, G. (2004) Beyond the Charter: The BBC After 2006. London: The Broadcasting Policy Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstein, D. (2008) ‘How to fund public service content in the digital age’ In: T. Gardam, and D. Levy (eds) The Price of Plurality: Choice, Diversity and Broadcasting Institutions in the Digital Age. Oxford: Oxford University Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, pp. 86–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell Lowe, G. and Bardoel, J. (eds) (2007) From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media. Göteborg: Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, Des, D. (2008) The Politics of Media Policy. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. (2009) ‘The public service publisher-An obituary’, Journal of British Cinema and Television, 6(1), 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, T. (1998) Regulating the Media. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, T. and Humphreys, P. (2012) Audiovisual Regulation under Pressure: Comparative Cases from North America and Europe. Abingdon, UK, and New York, USA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D. and Mancini, P. (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, M. (2009) The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords (2010) Communications Committee First Report, The British Film and Television Industries. London: House of Lords: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200910/ldselect/ldcomuni/37/3702.htm, date accessed 24 November 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. (1996) Mass Media and Media Policy in Western Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. (2006) ‘Press subsidies in the context of the information society. Historical perspective, modalities, concept and justification’ In: I. Fernández Alonso, M. de Moragas, J. Joaquín Blasco Gil and N. Almiron (eds) Press Subsidies in Europe, Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya/INCOM/UAB, pp. 38–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iosifidis, P. (2010) Reinventing Public Service Communication: European Broadcasters and Beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R. W. and Nichols, J. (2010) The Life and Death of American Journalism: The Media Revolution that Will Begin the World Again. Philadelphia, PA: Nation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. and McChesney, R. W. (2009) ‘The death and life of great American newspapers’, The Nation, 18 March. http://www.thenation.com/print/article/death-and-life-great-american-newspapers

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R. with Linnebank, G. (2011) Public Support for the Media: A Six-Country Overview of Direct and Indirect Subsidies. Oxford: Oxford University Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers, K. (2009) Mind the Funding Gap: The Potential of Industry Levies for Continued Funding of Public Service Broadcasting. London: Institute of Public Policy Research, an IPPR report for BECTU and the NUJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom (2004) Ofcom Review of Public Service Broadcasting. Phase 2-Meeting the Digital Challenge. London: Ofcom. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/psb2/psb2/psb_phase2.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom (2005) Review of Public Service Television. Phase 3. Competition for Quality. London: Ofcom. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/psb3/psb3.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom (2007a) A New Approach to Public Service Content in the Digital Media Age. London: Ofcom. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/pspnewap-proach/newapproach.pdf. Viewed August 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom (2007b) Responses to A New Approach to Public Service Content in the Digital Media Age. The Potential Role of the Public Service Publisher. London: Ofcom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom (2009) Of com’s Second Public Service Broadcasting Review: Putting Viewers First. London: Ofcom. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consulta-tions/psb2_phase2/statement/psb2statement.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • PACT (2007) Response to Ofcom’s Discussion Paper on PSP. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/pspnewapproach/responses/pact.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbridger, Alan, A. (2009) Why Journalism Matters. London: Media Standards Trust, Speech: http://mediastandardstrust.org/wp-content/uploads/down-loads/2010/08/Why-Journalism-Matters-Alan-Rusbridger.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Satellite and Cable Broadcasters’ Group (SCBG) (2007) Ofcom Consultation: Public Service Publisher. Submission by the Satellite and Cable Broadcasters’ Group http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/pspnewapproach/responses/scbg.pdf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Peter Humphreys

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Humphreys, P. (2015). Transferable Media Pluralism Policies from Europe. In: Barnett, S., Townend, J. (eds) Media Power and Plurality. Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137522849_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics