Advertisement

Bridging the Gaps between European and Chinese Civil Societies

  • Mark Pixley
  • Karen Lim
Part of the The Nottingham China Policy Institute Series book series (NCP)

Abstract

The above quote is indicative of an increasing consensus among concerned China scholars that there is a dire need for innovative solutions to bridge the communication and collaboration gap between Europe and China. As Eberhard Sandschneider argues:

[A] lack of trust and mutual respect characterizes Western-Chinese relations to such an extent that it impairs core strategic interests on both sides. Despite hundreds of delegations and thousands of exchange students, both China and the West are far from reaching a level of mutual understanding necessary for enduring and sustaining bilateral relations.2

Keywords

Civil Society Social Entrepreneurship Interactive Session Sustainable Consumption Chinese Participant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Eberhard Sandschneider (2012) ‘A Two-Way Bridge to China’, in Helmut K. Anheier and Bernhard Lorentz (eds) Bridging the Trust Divide: Cultural Diplomacy and Fostering Understanding between China and the West, ‘Introductory Note’ (Essen: Stiftung Mercator in cooperation with the German Council on Foreign Relations) http://www.stiftung-mercator.de/fileadmin/user_upload/INHALTE_UPLOAD/Service/Publikationen/2012/Publikation_Br idging_the_trust_divide.pdf (accessed 8 June 2014) p. 39.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Jia Xijin (2008) Zhongguo gongmin canyu. Anli yu moshi (Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe), p. 1.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Xu Yiping (2004) Xunzhao jiayuan: guanyu shequ fazhan de siyu xiang (Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe), p. 189.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Song Qinghua (2012) Goutong yu xieshang. Cujin chengshi shequ jianshe gonggong canyu de liu zhong fangfa (Beijing, Zhongguo shehui chubanshe), p. 2.Google Scholar
  5. 16.
    M. Weisbord and S. Janoff (2007) Don t Just Do Something, Stand There! Ten Principles for Leading Meeting that Matter (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler) p. 9.Google Scholar
  6. 18.
    W. Isaacs (1999) Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together: A Pioneering Approach to Communicating in Business and in Life (New York: Currency) p. 41.Google Scholar
  7. 19.
    Peggy Holman, Tom Devane and Steven Cady (2007) The Change Handbook: The Definitive Resource on Today’s Best Methods for Engaging Whole Systems (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler).Google Scholar
  8. 20.
    Harrison Owen (1997) Open Space Technology: A User’s Guide (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler) 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  9. 21.
    Marvin Weisbord and Sandra Janoff (2000) Future Search: An Action Guide to Finding Common Ground in Organizations and Communities (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler).Google Scholar
  10. 22.
    R. B. Stanfield (2002) The Workshop Book: From Individual Creativity to Group Action (Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers); and Laura Spencer (1989) Winning through Participation: Meeting the Challenge of Corporate Change withGoogle Scholar
  11. 23.
    Juanita Brown with David Isaacs (2005) The World Cafe: Shaping Our Futures through Conversations that Matter (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mark Pixley and Karen Lim 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Pixley
  • Karen Lim

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations