Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter explores the areas in which China and the European Union (EU) meet to cooperate or compete with each other in managing global financial affairs. It adopts an approach that combines the core elements found in realist, liberalist, constructivist, and evolutionary approaches. The chapter focuses on the International Monetary Fund (IMF) at the global level as the primary institution for analysis. At the regional level, it focuses on such major regional institutions as the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Asian Development Bank, and the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM). The CMIM is viewed by some observers as a mini-IMF in Asia. The chapter examines three policy areas in which China and the EU compete or cooperate with each other in the IMF: their monetary contributions, their personnel contributions, and their policy contributions. It argues that despite the rise of China, the country’s ability to contribute to global financial governance has been relatively limited and uneven up to this day. This is due mainly to the structure of the global financial system, which favors the dominance of the EU and the United States in it. Such embedded dominance has led China and likeminded countries, individually or collectively, to look for alternative structures, resulting in a financial world that is increasingly more pluralistic and polarized. China’s accumulation of huge amounts of sovereign reserves and its plan and ability to use them effectively to enhance its economic growth have helped facilitate the emergence of a new global financial order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Richard Ned Lebow, “You Can’t Keep a Bad Idea Down: Evolutionary Biology and International Relations,” International Politics Reviews, Vol. 1, September 2013, pp. 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. See also William R. Thompson (ed.), Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2001), p. 13, note 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and International Relations: On the Evolutionary Origins of War And ethnic Conflict (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tang Shiping, The Social Evolution of International Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel J. Levine, Recovering International Relations: The Promise of Sustainable Critique (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jianwei Wang Weiqing Song

Copyright information

© 2016 Gerald Chan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chan, G. (2016). International Financial Institutions. In: Wang, J., Song, W. (eds) China, the European Union, and the International Politics of Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514004_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics